[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Returning Details about Spam Evaluation when Rejecting Spam

To: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Returning Details about Spam Evaluation when Rejecting Spam
From: Hector Santos <hsantos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 07:30:04 -0500
Cc: IETF SMTP <ietf-smtp@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <4B13875F.8040405@xxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-smtp/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-smtp.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Organization: Santronics Software, Inc.
References: <4B0E88D0.1090209@xxxxxxxxx> <17165130911260954r1cbb8856h4063e105d1eeaf0c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <fpMEJLDRgV6tRRoq8NZbVw.md5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <> <4B123390.70504@xxxxxxx> <896A12B0-6DC4-4829-8DF3-286AE6B92F43@xxxxxxxxxxx> <4B13875F.8040405@xxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-ietf-smtp@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326)


Alessandro Vesely wrote:

Yeah, complicated settings only work for geeks. Perhaps that's why SPF,DKIM, or other anti-spam techniques' adoptions are snailing.



IMV, SPF adoption rate has peaked - most companies support it.

> In addition, postmasters are a category of stranded people...

They get what they pay for. :)

--
Sincerely

Hector Santos
http://www.santronics.com

Follow-Ups:
- Stranded postmasters (was: Returning Details about Spam Evaluation when Rejecting Spam
  - From: Alessandro Vesely

References:
- Returning Details about Spam Evaluation when Rejecting Spam
  - From: =?utf-8?b?0JTQuNC70Y/QvSDQn9Cw0LvQsNGD0LfQvtCy?=
- Re: Returning Details about Spam Evaluation when Rejecting Spam
  - From: Nate Leon
- Re: Returning Details about Spam Evaluation when Rejecting Spam
  - From: Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: Returning Details about Spam Evaluation when Rejecting Spam
  - From: John C Klensin
- Re: Returning Details about Spam Evaluation when Rejecting Spam
  - From: Alessandro Vesely
- Re: Returning Details about Spam Evaluation when Rejecting Spam
  - From: Steve Atkins
- Re: Returning Details about Spam Evaluation when Rejecting Spam
  - From: Alessandro Vesely

Prev by Date: Re: Returning Details about Spam Evaluation when Rejecting Spam
Next by Date: Re: Returning Details about Spam Evaluation when Rejecting Spam
Previous by thread: Re: Returning Details about Spam Evaluation when Rejecting Spam
Next by thread: Stranded postmasters (was: Returning Details about Spam Evaluation when Rejecting Spam
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread