[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp

To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp
From: Pete Resnick <presnick@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 12:12:58 -0500
Cc: "ietf-smtp@xxxxxxx" <ietf-smtp@xxxxxxx>
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qualcomm.com; i=presnick@xxxxxxxxxxxx; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1319562842; x=1351098842; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc: subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:x-originating-ip; z=Message-ID:=20<4EA6EE1A.5010804@xxxxxxxxxxxx>|Date:=20Tu e,=2025=20Oct=202011=2012:12:58=20-0500|From:=20Pete=20Re snick=20<presnick@xxxxxxxxxxxx>|User-Agent:=20Mozilla/5.0 =20(Macintosh=3B=20U=3B=20Intel=20Mac=20OS=20X=2010.6=3B =20en-US=3B=20rv:1.9.1.9)=20Gecko/20100630=20Eudora/3.0.4 |MIME-Version:=201.0|To:=20"Murray=20S.=20Kucherawy"=20<m sk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>|CC:=20"ietf-smtp@xxxxxxx"=20<ietf-smtp@ imc.org>|Subject:=20Re:=20draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp |References:=20<F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C14BF C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>|In-Reply-To:=20<F5833273385 BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C14BFC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx m>|Content-Type:=20text/plain=3B=20charset=3D"ISO-8859-1" =3B=20format=3Dflowed|Content-Transfer-Encoding:=207bit |X-Originating-IP:=20[172.30.48.1]; bh=gbU3/FQ5IeoZ26ck2SVSfw15kupvDk2hbYbsP0Qyww4=; b=RyXykc4IxV/XNJk3H7P0ud33M0138wF1I2MXJzodMW8zBI8AvMUqLdPP YH5P7iiPG5xCeIGfmz31gp3sa3RraQT4Zgkj8HD29xTvG0UjXsw7Og8r9 pI2zp1gYyF2EsFebnlSwF20Pq7EBf7AWOzMCpW0Avr3e9hgpW4G0wkmY9 0=;
In-reply-to: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C14BFC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-smtp/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-smtp.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C14BFC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-ietf-smtp@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100630 Eudora/3.0.4

(a) This shouldn't be labeled as a BCP. It's an A/S Standards Trackdraft if ever there was one.

(b) Given this and the extension, is it worth spinning up a Greylisting WG?

pr

On 10/23/11 3:40 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:

Maybe a new thread Subject: would help here...

Given the interest, I've started putting together a BCP.  It's now posted as draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp; comments welcome (and thanks to those of you that already did).  It is only an outline right now, and I'll fill it in as people make suggestions about topics it should cover and/or start providing text to include.

It doesn't touch the SMTP extension people are discussing.  Someone else can champion that one if so inclined.  That shouldn't go in a BCP because it doesn't even exist yet.  This document will only describe current and historic practices.

Maybe we can get it on the docket for Taipei.  I'll send out some friendly pings.

-MSK


--
Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Incorporated - Direct phone: (858)651-4478, Fax: (858)651-1102

Follow-Ups:
- Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp
  - From: Dave CROCKER
- RE: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp
  - From: Murray S. Kucherawy

References:
- draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp
  - From: Murray S. Kucherawy

Prev by Date: Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING
Next by Date: Re: I-D SMTP Extension for Greylisting
Previous by thread: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp
Next by thread: RE: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread