[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
(a) This shouldn't be labeled as a BCP. It's an A/S Standards Track
draft if ever there was one.
(b) Given this and the extension, is it worth spinning up a Greylisting WG?
On 10/23/11 3:40 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
Maybe a new thread Subject: would help here...
Given the interest, I've started putting together a BCP. It's now posted as draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp; comments welcome (and thanks to those of you that already did). It is only an outline right now, and I'll fill it in as people make suggestions about topics it should cover and/or start providing text to include.
It doesn't touch the SMTP extension people are discussing. Someone else can champion that one if so inclined. That shouldn't go in a BCP because it doesn't even exist yet. This document will only describe current and historic practices.
Maybe we can get it on the docket for Taipei. I'll send out some friendly pings.
Qualcomm Incorporated - Direct phone: (858)651-4478, Fax: (858)651-1102