[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt
I agree with Bill McQuillan's remarks. If the server knows at the time it
receives the message that there is going to be a delay then it can include
the new clause in its usual Received: header. Otherwise it'll have to add
a new header. Would it be OK to edit the previously-added header?
The examples all have syntax errors. Received: sub-fields have a
I think held-for would be a better (more descriptive) keyword than state.
f.anthony.n.finch <dot@xxxxxxxx> http://dotat.at/
East Sole, Lundy, Fastnet: Southeasterly 4 or 5, veering southwesterly 5 or 6
later, occasionally 7 later except Lundy. Moderate, becoming moderate or
rough. Rain or showers. Moderate or good.