[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bogus SPF deployment survey
- To: ietf-smtp@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: bogus SPF deployment survey
- From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 20:42:29 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tana.it; s=test; t=1335552149; bh=S2gXohTm7VSLWoan6TPEou6YMhcFB09uqBD1N4/Mtoo=; l=301; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=lbKuFbWs1MjVk8y8VphW5HjCEJ4WnBiIcSeCR+XgmpBC35LYNfEOAV9S5nM2nZPOg E3ZFYo62KiHp9FE94CGDsHJcWJnibz2FyNRihos0mDbHyFpQKhP3mUuNCL+zxxnIXI mlyjSOXFFPmFEULhlxsO3zQ2DE84A+8yR40o9eMQ=
- In-reply-to: <>
- List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-smtp/mail-archive/>
- List-id: <ietf-smtp.imc.org>
- List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
- References: <>
- Sender: owner-ietf-smtp@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1
On Fri 27/Apr/2012 20:18:08 +0200 John Levine wrote:
>
> Please save your time and everyone else's by *not* responding to his
> message
You did :-)
How much time are we talking about here? Thinking on an evolutionary
scale, it doesn't seem to be comparable to the time the experiment took.