Archive of ietf-smtp, by thread

• Re: Received: and sending IP, (continued)
  • Re: Received: and sending IP, Hector
• Recipient is offline, Menachem Moystoviz
  • Re: Recipient is offline, Paul Smith
    • RE: Recipient is offline, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • RE: Recipient is offline, John C Klensin
      • Re: Recipient is offline, Menachem Moystoviz
    • Re: Recipient is offline, Mark Andrews
      • Re: Recipient is offline, John C Klensin
      • Re: Recipient is offline, Hector Santos
      • Re: Recipient is offline, Mark Andrews
      • Re: Recipient is offline, Hector Santos
      • Re: Recipient is offline, Arnt Gulbrandsen
      • Re: Recipient is offline, John C Klensin
      • Re: Recipient is offline, Tony Finch
      • Re: Recipient is offline, John C Klensin
      • Re: Recipient is offline, John Levine
      • RE: Recipient is offline, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • RE: Recipient is offline, John C Klensin
      • Re: Recipient is offline, Hector Santos
      • Re: Recipient is offline, John C Klensin
      • Re: Recipient is offline, Hector
      • Re: Recipient is offline, John C Klensin
      • Re: Recipient is offline, Hector
      • Re: Recipient is offline, Robert A. Rosenberg
      • Re: Recipient is offline, Tony Finch
      • Re: Recipient is offline, Carl S. Gutekunst
      • Re: Recipient is offline, Keith Moore
      • Re: Recipient is offline, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: Recipient is offline, Tony Finch
      • Re: Recipient is offline, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: Recipient is offline, John Levine
      • Re: Recipient is offline, Tony Finch
      • Re: Recipient is offline, Hector Santos
      • Re: Recipient is offline, John Levine
      • Re: Recipient is offline, Hector Santos
      • Re: Recipient is offline, Hector Santos
      • Re: Recipient is offline, Tony Finch
      • Re: Recipient is offline, Hector
      • Re: Recipient is offline, Tony Finch
      • Re: Recipient is offline, Hector Santos
      • Re: Recipient is offline, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: Recipient is offline, Hector Santos
      • Re: Recipient is offline, Hector
      • Re: Recipient is offline, Robert A. Rosenberg
      • Re: Recipient is offline, Tony Finch
      • Re: Recipient is offline, ned+ietf-smtp
      • RE: Recipient is offline, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: Recipient is offline, Tony Finch
      • Outbound Order and Priority [was Re: Recipient is offline], Hector
      • Re: Outbound Order and Priority [was Re: Recipient is offline], Hector
      • Message not available
      • Re: Recipient is offline, Tony Finch
      • Re: Recipient is offline, Hector Santos
      • Re: Recipient is offline, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: Recipient is offline, Hector Santos
      • Re: Recipient is offline, Robert A. Rosenberg
    • Re: Recipient is offline, Hector Santos
• I-D Outline for "Issues and Enhancements for modern SMTP environments", Hector Santos
• The purpose of QUIT, Hector Santos
  • Re: The purpose of QUIT, Robert A. Rosenberg
    • Re: The purpose of QUIT, John C Klensin
    • Re: The purpose of QUIT, Hector Santos
  • Re: The purpose of QUIT, Keith Moore
    • Re: The purpose of QUIT, Hector Santos
• FWIW Connection Sharing Stats, Hector Santos
  • RE: FWIW Connection Sharing Stats, Murray S. Kucherawy
    • Re: FWIW Connection Sharing Stats, Hector Santos
      • Re: FWIW Connection Sharing Stats, Hector Santos
      • Re: FWIW Connection Sharing Stats, Keith Moore
      • Re: FWIW Connection Sharing Stats, Keith Moore
      • Re: FWIW Connection Sharing Stats, Hector Santos
      • Re: FWIW Connection Sharing Stats, Hector Santos
      • RE: FWIW Connection Sharing Stats, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • RE: FWIW Connection Sharing Stats, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: FWIW Connection Sharing Stats, Hector Santos
      • Re: FWIW Connection Sharing Stats, Hector Santos
• Security problems with SRV records, Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: Security problems with SRV records, Arnt Gulbrandsen
    • Re: Security problems with SRV records, Hector Santos
    • Re: Security problems with SRV records, Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: Security problems with SRV records, Arnt Gulbrandsen
• Mail Data termination, Hector Santos
  • Re: Mail Data termination, Hector Santos
  • Re: Mail Data termination, Randall Gellens
    • Re: Mail Data termination, Keith Moore
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Keith Moore
      • RE: Mail Data termination, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Hector Santos
      • Re: Mail Data termination, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: Mail Data termination, John C Klensin
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Randall Gellens
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Dave Crocker
      • Re: Mail Data termination, SM
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Hector Santos
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Keith Moore
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Hector Santos
      • Re: Mail Data termination, John C Klensin
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Randall Gellens
      • Re: Mail Data termination, John C Klensin
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Hector Santos
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Steve Atkins
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Hector Santos
      • Re: Mail Data termination, SM
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Hector Santos
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Sabahattin Gucukoglu
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Hector Santos
      • RE: Mail Data termination, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • RE: Mail Data termination, Tony Finch
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Hector Santos
      • Re: Mail Data termination, John C Klensin
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Tony Finch
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Hector Santos
      • RE: Mail Data termination, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • RE: Mail Data termination, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • RE: Mail Data termination, John C Klensin
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Rolf E. Sonneveld
      • Re: Mail Data termination, John Levine
      • Re: Mail Data termination, John C Klensin
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Hector Santos
      • RE: Mail Data termination, Tony Finch
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Hector Santos
      • RE: Mail Data termination, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Hector Santos
      • RE: Mail Data termination, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • RE: Mail Data termination, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Hector Santos
      • Re: Mail Data termination, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Hector Santos
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Hector Santos
      • Re: Mail Data termination, George Schlossnagle
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Hector Santos
      • RE: Mail Data termination, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Hector Santos
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Arnt Gulbrandsen
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Hector Santos
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Paul Smith
      • Re: Mail Data termination, John C Klensin
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Hector Santos
      • Re: Mail Data termination, John C Klensin
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Paul Smith
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Hector Santos
      • Re: Mail Data termination, John C Klensin
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Paul Smith
      • productivity? (was: Re: Mail Data termination), Dave CROCKER
      • Re: productivity? (was: Re: Mail Data termination), John C Klensin
      • Re: productivity?, Hector Santos
      • Re: productivity? (was: Re: Mail Data termination), Steve Atkins
      • Re: productivity?, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: productivity?, Hector Santos
      • Re: productivity?, Hector Santos
      • Re: productivity?, Peter J. Holzer
      • Re: productivity?, Hector Santos
      • RE: productivity?, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: productivity?, Peter J. Holzer
      • Re: productivity?, Hector Santos
      • RE: productivity?, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: productivity?, Hector Santos
      • Re: productivity?, Paul Smith
      • Re: productivity?, Hector Santos
      • Improving Timeouts, Hector Santos
      • Re: productivity?, Carl S. Gutekunst
      • Re: productivity?, Hector Santos
      • Re: productivity?, Carl S. Gutekunst
      • Re: productivity?, Hector Santos
      • Re: productivity?, Peter J. Holzer
      • Re: productivity?, Hector Santos
      • Re: productivity?, Hector Santos
      • RE: productivity?, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: productivity? (was: Re: Mail Data termination), Sabahattin Gucukoglu
      • Re: productivity?, Hector Santos
      • Re: productivity?, John C Klensin
      • Re: productivity?, Hector Santos
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: Mail Data termination, John C Klensin
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Paul Smith
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Bill McQuillan
      • Re: Mail Data termination, John C Klensin
      • RE: Mail Data termination, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Peter J. Holzer
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Hector Santos
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Peter J. Holzer
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Peter J. Holzer
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Hector Santos
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Hector Santos
      • RE: Mail Data termination, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Hector Santos
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Paul Smith
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Hector Santos
      • RE: Mail Data termination, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • RE: Mail Data termination, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Arnt Gulbrandsen
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Hector Santos
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Arnt Gulbrandsen
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Hector Santos
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Hector Santos
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Hector Santos
      • Connection Caching and Little's Law, Hector Santos
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Hector Santos
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Sabahattin Gucukoglu
      • RE: Mail Data termination, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Hector Santos
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Randall Gellens
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Hector Santos
      • Re: Mail Data termination, John C Klensin
      • RE: Mail Data termination, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Hector Santos
      • Re: Mail Data termination, SM
    • Re: Mail Data termination, Hector Santos
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Keith Moore
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Hector Santos
    • Re: Mail Data termination, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Randall Gellens
  • Re: Mail Data termination, Paul Smith
    • Re: Mail Data termination, Hector Santos
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Keith Moore
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Hector Santos
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Keith Moore
      • Re: Mail Data termination, Hector Santos
  • Re: Mail Data termination, Arnt Gulbrandsen
  • Re: Mail Data termination, Tony Finch
• Comments on: draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-02, Bill McQuillan
  • More comments on: draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-02, Alessandro Vesely
    • Re: More comments on: draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-02, Alexey Melnikov
      • Re: More comments on: draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-02, Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: More comments on: draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-02, ken carlberg
      • RE: More comments on: draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-02, Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: Comments on: draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-02, Alexey Melnikov
    • Re: Comments on: draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-02, Bill McQuillan
      • Re: Comments on: draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-02, ken carlberg
      • Re: Comments on: draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-02, Alexey Melnikov
      • Re: Comments on: draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-02, Bill McQuillan
      • Re: Comments on: draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-02, Alexey Melnikov
  • Re: Comments on: draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-02, Robert A. Rosenberg
• RFC5321 SMTP Cleanup - Retries Strategy, Hector Santos
• Logging port numbers, John Levine
  • RE: Logging port numbers, Murray S. Kucherawy
    • Re: Logging port numbers, John Levine
      • Re: Logging port numbers, Steve Atkins
      • Re: Logging port numbers, Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: Logging port numbers, John Levine
    • Re: Logging port numbers, Keith Moore
      • RE: Logging port numbers, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: Logging port numbers, Keith Moore
  • Re: Logging port numbers, Hector Santos
  • Re: Logging port numbers, John C Klensin
  • Re: Logging port numbers, Richard Clayton
    • Re: Logging port numbers, John Levine
      • Re: Logging port numbers, Keith Moore
      • Re: Logging port numbers, John Levine
      • Re: Logging port numbers, J.D. Falk
    • Re: Logging port numbers, Tony Finch
  • Re: Logging port numbers, Mark Martinec
    • Re: Logging port numbers, John Levine
• RSET command - possible security loophole, Hector Santos
  • Re: RSET command - possible security loophole, John C Klensin
    • RE: RSET command - possible security loophole, Murray S. Kucherawy
    • Re: RSET command - possible security loophole, Hector Santos
      • Re: RSET command - possible security loophole, John C Klensin
      • Re: RSET command - possible security loophole, Hector Santos
    • Re: RSET command - possible security loophole, Keith Moore
      • Re: RSET command - possible security loophole, John C Klensin
      • RE: RSET command - possible security loophole, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • RE: RSET command - possible security loophole, ned+ietf-smtp
      • RE: RSET command - possible security loophole, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: RSET command - possible security loophole, Hector Santos
      • RE: RSET command - possible security loophole, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: RSET command - possible security loophole, Peter Bowen
      • Re: RSET command - possible security loophole, Hector Santos
      • Re: RSET command - possible security loophole, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: RSET command - possible security loophole, John C Klensin
      • Re: RSET command - possible security loophole, Hector Santos
      • Re: RSET command - possible security loophole, John C Klensin
      • Re: RSET command - possible security loophole, Peter J. Holzer
      • Re: RSET command - possible security loophole, Peter Bowen
      • Re: RSET command - possible security loophole, John C Klensin
      • Re: RSET command - possible security loophole, Hector Santos
      • Re: RSET command - possible security loophole, Hector Santos
      • Re: RSET command - possible security loophole, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: RSET command - possible security loophole, John C Klensin
      • Re: UNAUTH, John Levine
      • Re: UNAUTH, Steve Atkins
      • Re: UNAUTH, John Levine
      • Re: UNAUTH, Steve Atkins
      • Re: UNAUTH, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: UNAUTH, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: UNAUTH, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: UNAUTH, John R Levine
      • Re: RSET command - possible security loophole, Hector Santos
      • Re: RSET command - possible security loophole, SM
      • Re: RSET command - possible security loophole, Hector Santos
  • Re: RSET command - possible security loophole, Derek J. Balling
    • Re: RSET command - possible security loophole, Hector Santos
  • Re: RSET command - possible security loophole, John Levine
    • Re: RSET command - possible security loophole, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: RSET command - possible security loophole, Dave Crocker
    • Re: RSET command - possible security loophole, Tony Finch
  • Re: RSET command - possible security loophole, Glenn Anderson
    • Re: RSET command - possible security loophole, Hector Santos
      • Re: RSET command - possible security loophole, John C Klensin
      • Re: RSET command - possible security loophole, Hector Santos
  • Re: RSET command - possible security loophole, SM
• Leading Dots, Hector Santos
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Leading Dots, Hector Santos
    • Re: Leading Dots - Disregard, Hector Santos
• test (please discard this message), Alessandro Vesely
• LOGIN mechanism, Peter Bowen
  • Re: LOGIN mechanism, Hector Santos
  • Re: LOGIN mechanism, Tony Finch
    • Re: LOGIN mechanism, Hector Santos
      • Re: LOGIN mechanism, Hector Santos
• abnf for <atext> in RFC 5321?, Dave CROCKER
  • Re: abnf for <atext> in RFC 5321?, A. Rothman
    • Re: abnf for <atext> in RFC 5321?, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: abnf for <atext> in RFC 5321?, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: abnf for <atext> in RFC 5321?, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: abnf for <atext> in RFC 5321?, Dave CROCKER
      • RE: abnf for <atext> in RFC 5321?, Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: abnf for <atext> in RFC 5321?, John Levine
  • Re: abnf for <atext> in RFC 5321?, SM
    • Re: abnf for <atext> in RFC 5321?, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: abnf for <atext> in RFC 5321?, Steve Atkins
      • Re: abnf for <atext> in RFC 5321?, John Levine
      • Re: abnf for <atext> in RFC 5321?, John C Klensin
      • Re: abnf for <atext> in RFC 5321?, SM
• RFC 5321 VRFY and quoting syntax, A. Rothman
  • Re: RFC 5321 VRFY and quoting syntax, Hector Santos
    • Re: RFC 5321 VRFY and quoting syntax, A. Rothman
  • RE: RFC 5321 VRFY and quoting syntax, Murray S. Kucherawy
    • Re: RFC 5321 VRFY and quoting syntax, Hector Santos
      • RE: RFC 5321 VRFY and quoting syntax, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: RFC 5321 VRFY and quoting syntax, Hector Santos
      • Re: RFC 5321 VRFY and quoting syntax, A. Rothman
      • Re: RFC 5321 VRFY and quoting syntax, Hector Santos
    • Re: RFC 5321 VRFY and quoting syntax, A. Rothman
      • RE: RFC 5321 VRFY and quoting syntax, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: RFC 5321 VRFY and quoting syntax, A. Rothman
  • Re: RFC 5321 VRFY and quoting syntax, Ned Freed
• slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Jeff Macdonald
  • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Hector Santos
    • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, SM
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Hector Santos
  • RE: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Murray S. Kucherawy
    • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Jeff Macdonald
      • RE: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Jeff Macdonald
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Hector Santos
      • RE: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Jeff Macdonald
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Hector Santos
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Jeff Macdonald
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Hector Santos
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Hector Santos
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Keith Moore
      • RE: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Laura Atkins
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Steve Atkins
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Derek Diget
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Keith Moore
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Steve Atkins
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Keith Moore
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Jeff Macdonald
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Hector Santos
      • RE: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Hector Santos
      • RE: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Hector Santos
      • RE: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Hector Santos
      • RE: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Hector Santos
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Jeff Macdonald
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Rolf E. Sonneveld
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Keith Moore
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Jeff Macdonald
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Keith Moore
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Jeff Macdonald
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Keith Moore
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Keith Moore
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Jeff Macdonald
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Keith Moore
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Hector Santos
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, John Levine
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Hector Santos
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Tim Kehres
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Tim Kehres
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Keith Moore
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Keith Moore
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Arnt Gulbrandsen
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Keith Moore
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, John C Klensin
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Laura Atkins
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Keith Moore
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, John Levine
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Keith Moore
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, John R Levine
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Keith Moore
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, John R Levine
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Keith Moore
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, John C Klensin
      • RE: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, MH Michael Hammer (5304)
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Hector Santos
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Laura Atkins
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Keith Moore
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Al Iverson
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Hector Santos
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Keith Moore
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Hector Santos
      • Secured User Communications, Hector Santos
      • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Hector Santos
  • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Hector Santos
• [Fwd: [apps-discuss] Call for adoption of draft-kucherawy-mta-malformed-00.txt as an APPSAWG document], Alexey Melnikov
• FW: Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft, Murray S. Kucherawy
• BINARYMIME clarification, Peter Bowen
  • Re: BINARYMIME clarification, ned+ietf-smtp
• FYA: The Internet on the Today Show... in 1994..., Dave CROCKER
• mailing list footer addition to MIME email, Dave CROCKER
  • Re: mailing list footer addition to MIME email, Steve Atkins
    • Re: mailing list footer addition to MIME email, Paul Smith
  • Re: mailing list footer addition to MIME email, SM
  • Re: mailing list footer addition to MIME email, John Levine
• Text of the 'first email ever sent', Dave CROCKER
  • Re: Text of the 'first email ever sent', Dave CROCKER
  • Re: Text of the 'first email ever sent', Steve Atkins
    • is it still email (was Re: Text of the 'first email ever sent'), Dave CROCKER
  • Re: Text of the 'first email ever sent', John C Klensin
• A few ipv6 questions, John R Levine
  • Re: A few ipv6 questions, SM
    • Re: A few ipv6 questions, John C Klensin
      • Re: A few ipv6 questions, SM
      • Re: A few ipv6 questions, Tony Hansen
    • Re: A few ipv6 questions, John R Levine
      • Re: A few ipv6 questions, Tony Hansen
    • Re: A few ipv6 questions, ned+ietf-smtp
      • RE: A few ipv6 questions, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • RE: A few ipv6 questions, ned+ietf-smtp
      • RE: A few ipv6 questions, John R Levine
      • RE: A few ipv6 questions, John C Klensin
      • RE: A few ipv6 questions, John R Levine
      • Re: A few ipv6 questions, Patrik Fältström
      • Re: A few ipv6 questions, John R Levine
      • Re: A few ipv6 questions, Hector Santos
      • Re: A few ipv6 questions, Douglas Otis
  • Re: A few ipv6 questions, Patrik Fältström
    • Re: A few ipv6 questions, John C Klensin
• ABNF in RFC5321, Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: ABNF in RFC5321, Sabahattin Gucukoglu
  • Re: ABNF in RFC5321, John C Klensin
    • Re: ABNF in RFC5321, Tony Finch
  • Message not available
    • Re: ABNF in RFC5321, SM
      • Re: ABNF in RFC5321, Tony Hansen
      • Re: ABNF in RFC5321, Tony Finch
      • Re: ABNF in RFC5321, Tony Hansen
• Fwd: NomCom 2010-2011: Call for More Nominations, Tony Hansen
• draft-macdonald-antispam-registry and Subject code 8, Jeff Macdonald
• 01 version of draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Jeff Macdonald
• Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, Dave CROCKER
  • Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, Hector Santos
  • Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, Steve Atkins
  • Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, John C Klensin
    • Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, Tony Hansen
      • Draft to Full, versus cycling at Draft, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: Draft to Full, versus cycling at Draft, John C Klensin
      • Re: Draft to Full, versus cycling at Draft, Tony Hansen
      • Re: Draft to Full, versus cycling at Draft, Hector Santos
      • Re: Draft to Full, versus cycling at Draft, Jeff Macdonald
      • Re: Draft to Full, versus cycling at Draft, SM
      • Re: Draft to Full, versus cycling at Draft, John C Klensin
      • Re: Draft to Full, versus cycling at Draft, SM
      • Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, SM
      • Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, Tony Finch
      • Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, Hector Santos
    • RE: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, Steve Atkins
      • Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, Steve Atkins
      • Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, Jeff Macdonald
      • Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, Steve Atkins
      • Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, Jeff Macdonald
      • Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, Hector Santos
      • Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, John C Klensin
      • RE: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, ned+ietf-smtp
      • RE: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, Tony Finch
      • RE: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, ned+ietf-smtp
      • RE: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, John C Klensin
      • Re: NDNs considered harmful, John Levine
      • RE: NDNs considered harmful, Rosenwald, Jordan
      • Re: NDNs considered harmful, Paul Smith
      • Re: NDNs considered harmful, Hector Santos
      • Re: NDNs considered harmful, Rich Kulawiec
      • Re: NDNs considered harmful, Hector Santos
      • Re: NDNs considered harmful, Rich Kulawiec
      • Re: NDNs considered harmful, Hector Santos
      • Call Back Verification (was: NDNs considered harmful), Peter J. Holzer

The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections to this Web page, please send them to phoffman@imc.org.