Archive of ietf-smtp, by thread

• Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, (continued)
  • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Hector Santos
  • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Dave CROCKER
  • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Tim Kehres
  • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Dave CROCKER
  • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Tim Kehres
  • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Dave CROCKER
  • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Keith Moore
  • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Keith Moore
  • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Arnt Gulbrandsen
  • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Keith Moore
  • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, John C Klensin
  • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Laura Atkins
  • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Keith Moore
  • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, John Levine
  • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Keith Moore
  • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, John R Levine
  • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Keith Moore
  • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, John R Levine
  • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Keith Moore
  • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, John C Klensin
  • RE: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, MH Michael Hammer (5304)
  • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Hector Santos
  • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Laura Atkins
  • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Keith Moore
  • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Al Iverson
  • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Hector Santos
  • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Keith Moore
  • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Hector Santos
  • Secured User Communications, Hector Santos
  • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Hector Santos
  • Re: slight update to draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Hector Santos
• [Fwd: [apps-discuss] Call for adoption of draft-kucherawy-mta-malformed-00.txt as an APPSAWG document], Alexey Melnikov
• FW: Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft, Murray S. Kucherawy
• BINARYMIME clarification, Peter Bowen
  • Re: BINARYMIME clarification, ned+ietf-smtp
• FYA: The Internet on the Today Show... in 1994..., Dave CROCKER
• mailing list footer addition to MIME email, Dave CROCKER
  • Re: mailing list footer addition to MIME email, Steve Atkins
    • Re: mailing list footer addition to MIME email, Paul Smith
  • Re: mailing list footer addition to MIME email, SM
  • Re: mailing list footer addition to MIME email, John Levine
• Text of the 'first email ever sent', Dave CROCKER
  • Re: Text of the 'first email ever sent', Dave CROCKER
  • Re: Text of the 'first email ever sent', Steve Atkins
    • is it still email (was Re: Text of the 'first email ever sent'), Dave CROCKER
  • Re: Text of the 'first email ever sent', John C Klensin
• A few ipv6 questions, John R Levine
  • Re: A few ipv6 questions, SM
    • Re: A few ipv6 questions, John C Klensin
      • Re: A few ipv6 questions, SM
      • Re: A few ipv6 questions, Tony Hansen
    • Re: A few ipv6 questions, John R Levine
      • Re: A few ipv6 questions, Tony Hansen
    • Re: A few ipv6 questions, ned+ietf-smtp
      • RE: A few ipv6 questions, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • RE: A few ipv6 questions, ned+ietf-smtp
      • RE: A few ipv6 questions, John R Levine
      • RE: A few ipv6 questions, John C Klensin
      • RE: A few ipv6 questions, John R Levine
      • Re: A few ipv6 questions, Patrik Fältström
      • Re: A few ipv6 questions, John R Levine
      • Re: A few ipv6 questions, Hector Santos
      • Re: A few ipv6 questions, Douglas Otis
  • Re: A few ipv6 questions, Patrik Fältström
    • Re: A few ipv6 questions, John C Klensin
• ABNF in RFC5321, Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: ABNF in RFC5321, Sabahattin Gucukoglu
  • Re: ABNF in RFC5321, John C Klensin
    • Re: ABNF in RFC5321, Tony Finch
  • Message not available
    • Re: ABNF in RFC5321, SM
      • Re: ABNF in RFC5321, Tony Hansen
      • Re: ABNF in RFC5321, Tony Finch
      • Re: ABNF in RFC5321, Tony Hansen
• Fwd: NomCom 2010-2011: Call for More Nominations, Tony Hansen
• draft-macdonald-antispam-registry and Subject code 8, Jeff Macdonald
• 01 version of draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Jeff Macdonald
• Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, Dave CROCKER
  • Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, Hector Santos
  • Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, Steve Atkins
  • Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, John C Klensin
    • Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, Tony Hansen
      • Draft to Full, versus cycling at Draft, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: Draft to Full, versus cycling at Draft, John C Klensin
      • Re: Draft to Full, versus cycling at Draft, Tony Hansen
      • Re: Draft to Full, versus cycling at Draft, Hector Santos
      • Re: Draft to Full, versus cycling at Draft, Jeff Macdonald
      • Re: Draft to Full, versus cycling at Draft, SM
      • Re: Draft to Full, versus cycling at Draft, John C Klensin
      • Re: Draft to Full, versus cycling at Draft, SM
      • Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, SM
      • Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, Tony Finch
      • Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, Hector Santos
    • RE: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, Steve Atkins
      • Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, Steve Atkins
      • Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, Jeff Macdonald
      • Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, Steve Atkins
      • Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, Jeff Macdonald
      • Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, Hector Santos
      • Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, John C Klensin
      • RE: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, ned+ietf-smtp
      • RE: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, Tony Finch
      • RE: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, ned+ietf-smtp
      • RE: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, John C Klensin
      • Re: NDNs considered harmful, John Levine
      • RE: NDNs considered harmful, Rosenwald, Jordan
      • Re: NDNs considered harmful, Paul Smith
      • Re: NDNs considered harmful, Hector Santos
      • Re: NDNs considered harmful, Rich Kulawiec
      • Re: NDNs considered harmful, Hector Santos
      • Re: NDNs considered harmful, Rich Kulawiec
      • Re: NDNs considered harmful, Hector Santos
      • Call Back Verification (was: NDNs considered harmful), Peter J. Holzer
      • Re: NDNs considered harmful, Peter J. Holzer
      • Re: NDNs considered harmful, Hector Santos
      • RE: NDNs considered harmful, John R Levine
      • Re: NDNs considered harmful, Derek J. Balling
      • Re: NDNs considered harmful, Hector Santos
      • Re: NDNs considered harmful, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: NDNs considered harmful, Hector Santos
      • Re: NDNs considered harmful, Paul Smith
      • Re: NDNs considered harmful, John R Levine
      • Re: NDNs considered harmful, Paul Smith
      • Re: NDNs considered harmful, Derek J. Balling
      • Re: NDNs considered harmful, Paul Smith
      • Re: NDNs considered harmful, Hector Santos
      • Re: NDNs considered harmful, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: NDNs considered harmful, Hector Santos
      • Re: NDNs considered harmful, Hector Santos
  • Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, John Levine
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, John C Klensin
    • Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, David MacQuigg
      • Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, Hector Santos
• Processing after the end of DATA, Dave CROCKER
  • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Steve Atkins
    • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Tony Hansen
      • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, John C Klensin
      • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Tony Hansen
      • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Hector Santos
      • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Carl S. Gutekunst
      • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Hector Santos
      • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Carl S. Gutekunst
      • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Carl S. Gutekunst
      • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, SM
      • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Nathaniel Borenstein
      • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, David MacQuigg
      • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Carl S. Gutekunst
      • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, David MacQuigg
      • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, John Levine
      • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, David MacQuigg
      • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, =?utf-8?b?0JTQuNC70Y/QvSDQn9Cw0LvQsNGD0LfQvtCy?=
      • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, John Levine
      • Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, Carl S. Gutekunst
      • Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, Nathaniel Borenstein
      • Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, Steve Atkins
      • Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, Tony Finch
      • Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, Douglas Otis
      • Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, John R Levine
      • Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, Carl S. Gutekunst
      • Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, John Levine
      • Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, Carl S. Gutekunst
      • Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, Ray Bellis
      • Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, Carl S. Gutekunst
      • Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, Ray Bellis
      • Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, Hector Santos
      • Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, Carl S. Gutekunst
      • Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, Hector Santos
      • Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, Hector Santos
      • Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, Hector Santos
      • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, David MacQuigg
      • Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, =?utf-8?b?0JTQuNC70Y/QvSDQn9Cw0LvQsNGD0LfQvtCy?=
      • Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, David MacQuigg
      • Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, =?utf-8?b?0JTQuNC70Y/QvSDQn9Cw0LvQsNGD0LfQvtCy?=
      • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Arnt Gulbrandsen
      • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Robert A. Rosenberg
      • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Hector Santos
      • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, J.D. Falk
    • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, John Levine
      • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Hector Santos
      • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Carl S. Gutekunst
      • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Tony Finch
      • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, John C Klensin
      • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Tony Finch
      • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Arnt Gulbrandsen
      • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Tony Finch
      • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Arnt Gulbrandsen
      • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Tony Finch
      • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Steve Atkins
      • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Tony Finch
      • Re: mail proxies, Processing after the end of DATA, John Levine
      • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Hector Santos
      • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Paul Smith
      • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Hector Santos
      • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Arnt Gulbrandsen
      • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Arnt Gulbrandsen
      • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Hector Santos
      • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Tony Finch
      • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Hector Santos
      • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, John C Klensin
  • RE: Processing after the end of DATA, Rosenwald, Jordan
    • RE: Processing after the end of DATA, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, SM
      • Re: Processing after the end of DATA, ned+ietf-smtp
• Yahoo Mail Filtering, Hector Santos
  • Re: Yahoo Mail Filtering, =?utf-8?b?0JTQuNC70Y/QvSDQn9Cw0LvQsNGD0LfQvtCy?=
  • Re: Yahoo Mail Filtering, J.D. Falk
    • Re: Yahoo Mail Filtering, Hector Santos
      • Re: Yahoo Mail Filtering, J.D. Falk
      • Re: Yahoo Mail Filtering, Hector Santos
      • Re: Yahoo Mail Filtering, Hector Santos
      • Re: Yahoo Mail Filtering, Laura Atkins
      • Re: Yahoo Mail Filtering, Hector Santos
• Historical moment: Marking a generational transition, Dave CROCKER
  • Re: Historical moment: Marking a generational transition, Ray Bellis
  • Re: Historical moment: Marking a generational transition, Sabahattin Gucukoglu
• Edited Mail and Resent Headers, Hector Santos
  • RE: Edited Mail and Resent Headers, Murray S. Kucherawy
    • Re: Edited Mail and Resent Headers, Arnt Gulbrandsen
    • Re: Edited Mail and Resent Headers, Hector Santos
      • Re: Edited Mail and Resent Headers, Peter J. Holzer
      • Re: Edited Mail and Resent Headers, Hector Santos
      • Re: Edited Mail and Resent Headers, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: Edited Mail and Resent Headers, Hector Santos
• Resent Headers and Online Mail Forums, Hector Santos
• Fwd: [ietf-dkim] ADSP discardable & discussion lists (was Re: Wrong Discussion - was Why mailing lists should strip DKIM signatures), Dave CROCKER
  • Re: Fwd: [ietf-dkim] ADSP discardable & discussion lists (was Re: Wrong Discussion - was Why mailing lists should strip DKIM signatures), Douglas Otis
• blacklisting backscatter, John Leslie
  • Re: blacklisting backscatter, Joerg Backschues
  • Re: blacklisting backscatter, Arnt Gulbrandsen
    • Re: blacklisting backscatter, John C Klensin
  • Re: blacklisting backscatter, Steve Atkins
  • Re: blacklisting backscatter, ned+ietf-smtp
  • Re: blacklisting backscatter, David MacQuigg
  • Re: blacklisting backscatter, Sabahattin Gucukoglu
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: blacklisting backscatter, Rosenwald, Jordan
• draft-macdonald-antispam-registry and interop, Jeff Macdonald
  • RE: draft-macdonald-antispam-registry and interop, Murray S. Kucherawy
    • Re: draft-macdonald-antispam-registry and interop, Jeff Macdonald
      • RE: draft-macdonald-antispam-registry and interop, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: draft-macdonald-antispam-registry and interop, Jeff Macdonald
• some changes for draft-macdonald-antispam-registry, Jeff Macdonald
• Content-Transfer-Encoding list registry, Mikel Lindsaar
  • Re: Content-Transfer-Encoding list registry, ned+ietf-smtp
• Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-macdonald-antispam-registry-00, Jeff Macdonald
  • Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-macdonald-antispam-registry-00, Hector Santos
    • Re: New Version Notification for draft-macdonald-antispam-registry-00, Jeff Macdonald
      • Re: New Version Notification for draft-macdonald-antispam-registry-00, Mark Martinec
      • RE: New Version Notification for draft-macdonald-antispam-registry-00, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: New Version Notification for draft-macdonald-antispam-registry-00, J.D. Falk
      • RE: New Version Notification for draft-macdonald-antispam-registry-00, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: New Version Notification for draft-macdonald-antispam-registry-00, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: New Version Notification for draft-macdonald-antispam-registry-00, Hector Santos
      • RE: New Version Notification for draft-macdonald-antispam-registry-00, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: New Version Notification for draft-macdonald-antispam-registry-00, Todd Herr
      • RE: New Version Notification for draft-macdonald-antispam-registry-00, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • RE: New Version Notification for draft-macdonald-antispam-registry-00, Rosenwald, Jordan
      • RE: New Version Notification for draft-macdonald-antispam-registry-00, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: New Version Notification for draft-macdonald-antispam-registry-00, Dennis Dayman
      • Re: New Version Notification for draft-macdonald-antispam-registry-00, Jeff Macdonald
      • RE: New Version Notification for draft-macdonald-antispam-registry-00, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: New Version Notification for draft-macdonald-antispam-registry-00, Hector Santos
      • Re: New Version Notification for draft-macdonald-antispam-registry-00, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: New Version Notification for draft-macdonald-antispam-registry-00, Jeff Macdonald
  • Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-macdonald-antispam-registry-00, =?utf-8?b?0JTQuNC70Y/QvSDQn9Cw0LvQsNGD0LfQvtCy?=
    • Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-macdonald-antispam-registry-00, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: New Version Notification for draft-macdonald-antispam-registry-00, Jeff Macdonald
      • Re: New Version Notification for draft-macdonald-antispam-registry-00, Dilyan Palauzov
      • Re: New Version Notification for draft-macdonald-antispam-registry-00, ned+ietf-smtp
  • Message not available
    • Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-macdonald-antispam-registry-00, SM
      • Re: New Version Notification for draft-macdonald-antispam-registry-00, Jeff Macdonald
• Re: [rt.ietf.org #24364] mail.ietf.org. is ietf.org., Remove MX Records For Less Spam, Sabahattin Gucukoglu
• TLS and expired certs, Hector Santos
• Multi-Line Greetings A Certainty?, Sabahattin Gucukoglu
  • Re: Multi-Line Greetings A Certainty?, John Levine
    • Re: Multi-Line Greetings A Certainty?, Sabahattin Gucukoglu
  • Re: Multi-Line Greetings A Certainty?, Hector Santos
    • Re: Multi-Line Greetings A Certainty?, Sabahattin Gucukoglu
      • Re: Multi-Line Greetings A Certainty?, Hector Santos
  • Re: Multi-Line Greetings A Certainty?, Hector Santos
  • Re: Multi-Line Greetings A Certainty?, Arnt Gulbrandsen
    • Re: Multi-Line Greetings A Certainty?, Hector Santos
• UUEncoding File Attachment, Hector Santos
  • Re: UUEncoding File Attachment, Carl S. Gutekunst
    • Re: UUEncoding File Attachment, Hector Santos
      • Re: UUEncoding File Attachment, Carl S. Gutekunst
      • Re: UUEncoding File Attachment, Hector Santos
  • Re: UUEncoding File Attachment, Russ Allbery
    • Re: UUEncoding File Attachment, Carl S. Gutekunst
      • Re: UUEncoding File Attachment, Russ Allbery
      • Re: UUEncoding File Attachment, Hector Santos
      • Re: UUEncoding File Attachment, Russ Allbery
      • Re: UUEncoding File Attachment, Hector Santos
      • Re: UUEncoding File Attachment, Russ Allbery
      • Re: UUEncoding File Attachment, Tim Kehres
• Re: draft-daboo-srv-email and 'creative use' of DNS SRV, Alfred Hönes
• draft-daboo-srv-email, Tony Finch
  • Re: draft-daboo-srv-email, John C Klensin
    • Re: draft-daboo-srv-email, Alexey Melnikov
      • Re: draft-daboo-srv-email, Tony Finch
      • Re: draft-daboo-srv-email, Arnt Gulbrandsen
      • Re: draft-daboo-srv-email, Tony Finch
      • Re: draft-daboo-srv-email, Arnt Gulbrandsen
      • Re: draft-daboo-srv-email, Tony Finch
      • Re: draft-daboo-srv-email, Tony Finch
      • Re: draft-daboo-srv-email, John C Klensin
      • Re: draft-daboo-srv-email, Cyrus Daboo
      • Re: draft-daboo-srv-email, Tony Finch
      • Re: draft-daboo-srv-email, Cyrus Daboo
      • Re: draft-daboo-srv-email, Tony Finch
      • Re: draft-daboo-srv-email, Hector Santos
      • Re: draft-daboo-srv-email, Cyrus Daboo
      • Re: draft-daboo-srv-email, Russ Allbery
      • Re: draft-daboo-srv-email, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: draft-daboo-srv-email, Tony Finch
      • Re: draft-daboo-srv-email, John C Klensin
      • Re: draft-daboo-srv-email, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: draft-daboo-srv-email, Tony Finch
  • Re: draft-daboo-srv-email, Cyrus Daboo
    • Re: draft-daboo-srv-email, Hector Santos
      • Re: draft-daboo-srv-email, Russ Allbery
      • Re: draft-daboo-srv-email, Hector Santos
      • Re: draft-daboo-srv-email, Russ Allbery
      • Re: draft-daboo-srv-email, Cyrus Daboo
      • Re: draft-daboo-srv-email, Hector Santos
      • Re: draft-daboo-srv-email, Willie Gillespie
      • Re: draft-daboo-srv-email, ned+ietf-smtp
• Eight-Bit Line-Oriented Binary Encoding in SMTP, Sabahattin Gucukoglu
  • Re: Eight-Bit Line-Oriented Binary Encoding in SMTP, Tony Finch
• DATA Pipelining, Sabahattin Gucukoglu
  • Re: DATA Pipelining, Steve Atkins
    • Re: DATA Pipelining, David MacQuigg
    • Re: DATA Pipelining, Sabahattin Gucukoglu
  • Re: DATA Pipelining, Tony Finch
    • Re: DATA Pipelining, Sabahattin Gucukoglu
      • Re: DATA Pipelining, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: DATA Pipelining, Tony Finch
• Returning Details about Spam Evaluation when Rejecting Spam, =?utf-8?b?0JTQuNC70Y/QvSDQn9Cw0LvQsNGD0LfQvtCy?=
  • Re: Returning Details about Spam Evaluation when Rejecting Spam, Hector Santos
  • Re: Returning Details about Spam Evaluation when Rejecting Spam, Nate Leon
    • Re: Returning Details about Spam Evaluation when Rejecting Spam, Arnt Gulbrandsen
      • Re: Returning Details about Spam Evaluation when Rejecting Spam, John C Klensin
      • Re: Returning Details about Spam Evaluation when Rejecting Spam, Arvel Hathcock
      • Re: Returning Details about Spam Evaluation when Rejecting Spam, John C Klensin
      • Re: Returning Details about Spam Evaluation when Rejecting Spam, Arvel Hathcock
      • Re: Returning Details about Spam Evaluation when Rejecting Spam, Hector Santos
      • Re: Returning Details about Spam Evaluation when Rejecting Spam, Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: Returning Details about Spam Evaluation when Rejecting Spam, Steve Atkins
      • Re: Returning Details about Spam Evaluation when Rejecting Spam, Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: Returning Details about Spam Evaluation when Rejecting Spam, Hector Santos
      • Stranded postmasters (was: Returning Details about Spam Evaluation when Rejecting Spam, Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: Stranded postmasters, Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: Stranded postmasters, Hector Santos
      • Re: Stranded postmasters, Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: Stranded postmasters, Hector Santos
      • Re: Stranded postmasters, Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: Stranded postmasters, Hector Santos
      • Re: Stranded postmasters, Douglas Otis
      • Re: Returning Details about Spam Evaluation when Rejecting Spam, =?utf-8?b?0JTQuNC70Y/QvSDQn9Cw0LvQsNGD0LfQvtCy?=
  • Re: Returning Details about Spam Evaluation when Rejecting Spam, Tony Finch
    • Re: Returning Details about Spam Evaluation when Rejecting Spam, Steve Atkins
      • Re: Returning Details about Spam Evaluation when Rejecting Spam, Tony Finch
      • Re: Returning Details about Spam Evaluation when Rejecting Spam, Steve Atkins
      • Last line of the SMTP reply, =?utf-8?b?0JTQuNC70Y/QvSDQn9Cw0LvQsNGD0LfQvtCy?=
    • Re: Returning Details about Spam Evaluation when Rejecting Spam, Hector Santos
• Looking for implementations of RFC 3848 (ESMTP and LMTP Transmission Types Registration), Alexey Melnikov
  • Re: [yam] Looking for implementations of RFC 3848 (ESMTP and LMTP Transmission Types Registration), ned+ietf-smtp
  • Re: Looking for implementations of RFC 3848 (ESMTP and LMTP Transmission Types Registration), Hector Santos
    • Re: Looking for implementations of RFC 3848 (ESMTP and LMTP Transmission Types Registration), Alexey Melnikov
  • Re: Looking for implementations of RFC 3848 (ESMTP and LMTP Transmission Types Registration), Tony Finch
    • Re: Looking for implementations of RFC 3848 (ESMTP and LMTP Transmission Types Registration), Mark Martinec
      • Re: [yam] Looking for implementations of RFC 3848 (ESMTP and LMTP Transmission Types Registration), Tony Finch
• domain ABNF, Hector Santos
  • Re: domain ABNF, Tony Finch
• Re: [yam] RFC 5321 (was: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5321 (1820), Alessandro Vesely
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [yam] RFC 5321 (was: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5321 (1820), John C Klensin
• Requesting comments on draft-cheney-safe-02.txt, Cheney, Edward A SSG RES USAR USARC
  • Re: Requesting comments on draft-cheney-safe-02.txt, J.D. Falk
    • Re: Requesting comments on draft-cheney-safe-02.txt, Cheney, Edward A SSG RES USAR USARC
      • Re: Requesting comments on draft-cheney-safe-02.txt, Hector Santos
      • Re: Requesting comments on draft-cheney-safe-02.txt, Cheney, Edward A SSG RES USAR USARC
      • Re: Requesting comments on draft-cheney-safe-02.txt, Hector Santos
      • Re: Requesting comments on draft-cheney-safe-02.txt, Hector Santos
      • Re: Requesting comments on draft-cheney-safe-02.txt, Cheney, Edward A SSG RES USAR USARC
      • Re: Requesting comments on draft-cheney-safe-02.txt, Hector Santos
      • Re: Requesting comments on draft-cheney-safe-02.txt, Cheney, Edward A SSG RES USAR USARC
      • Re: Requesting comments on draft-cheney-safe-02.txt, Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: Requesting comments on draft-cheney-safe-02.txt, Cheney, Edward A SSG RES USAR USARC
      • Re: Requesting comments on draft-cheney-safe-02.txt, Peter J. Holzer
      • Re: Requesting comments on draft-cheney-safe-02.txt, Cheney, Edward A SSG RES USAR USARC
      • Re: Requesting comments on draft-cheney-safe-02.txt, Peter J. Holzer
      • Re: Requesting comments on draft-cheney-safe-02.txt, Cheney, Edward A SSG RES USAR USARC
      • Re: Requesting comments on draft-cheney-safe-02.txt, Willie Gillespie
      • Re: Requesting comments on draft-cheney-safe-02.txt, Cheney, Edward A SSG RES USAR USARC
      • Re: Requesting comments on draft-cheney-safe-02.txt, Robert A. Rosenberg
      • Re: Requesting comments on draft-cheney-safe-02.txt, Rich Kulawiec
      • Re: Requesting comments on draft-cheney-safe-02.txt, John C Klensin
      • Re: Requesting comments on draft-cheney-safe-02.txt, Cheney, Edward A SSG RES USAR USARC
      • Re: Requesting comments on draft-cheney-safe-02.txt, Hector Santos
      • Re: Requesting comments on draft-cheney-safe-02.txt, Cheney, Edward A SSG RES USAR USARC
      • Re: Requesting comments on draft-cheney-safe-02.txt, Hector Santos
      • Re: Requesting comments on draft-cheney-safe-02.txt, Cheney, Edward A SSG RES USAR USARC
      • Re: Requesting comments on draft-cheney-safe-02.txt, Hector Santos
      • Re: Requesting comments on draft-cheney-safe-02.txt, Cheney, Edward A SSG RES USAR USARC
      • Re: Requesting comments on draft-cheney-safe-02.txt, J.D. Falk
      • Re: [AKO Warning - Message fails DKIM verification] Re: Requesting comments on draft-cheney-safe-02.txt, Cheney, Edward A SSG RES USAR USARC
      • Re: [AKO Warning - Message fails DKIM verification] Re: Requesting comments on draft-cheney-safe-02.txt, John Levine
      • Re: [AKO Warning - Message fails DKIM verification] Re: [AKO Warning - Message fails DKIM verification] Re: Requesting comments on draft-cheney-safe-02.txt, Cheney, Edward A SSG RES USAR USARC
      • Re: Requesting comments on draft-cheney-safe-02.txt, John R Levine
      • Re: Requesting comments on draft-cheney-safe-02.txt, John C Klensin
      • Re: Requesting comments on draft-cheney-safe-02.txt, Cheney, Edward A SSG RES USAR USARC
      • Re: Requesting comments on draft-cheney-safe-02.txt, Hector Santos
      • Re: Requesting comments on draft-cheney-safe-02.txt, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: [AKO Warning - Message fails DKIM verification] Re: [AKO Warning - Message fails DKIM verification] Re: Requesting comments on draft-cheney-safe-02.txt, Hector Santos
      • Re: [AKO Warning - Message fails DKIM verification] Re: [AKO Warning - Message fails DKIM verification] Re: Requesting comments on draft-cheney-safe-02.txt, Cheney, Edward A SSG RES USAR USARC
      • Re: [AKO Warning - Message fails DKIM verification] Re: [AKO Warning - Message fails DKIM verification] Re: Requesting comments on draft-cheney-safe-02.txt, Hector Santos
      • Re: Requesting comments on draft-cheney-safe-02.txt, Rich Kulawiec
  • Re: Requesting comments on draft-cheney-safe-02.txt, SM
    • Re: Requesting comments on draft-cheney-safe-02.txt, Cheney, Edward A SSG RES USAR USARC
      • Re: Requesting comments on draft-cheney-safe-02.txt, Steve Atkins
  • Re: Requesting comments on draft-cheney-safe-02.txt, Cheney, Edward A SSG RES USAR USARC
    • Re: Requesting comments on draft-cheney-safe-02.txt, Steve Atkins
      • Re: Requesting comments on draft-cheney-safe-02.txt, Cheney, Edward A SSG RES USAR USARC
  • Re: Requesting comments on draft-cheney-safe-02.txt, Willie Gillespie
    • Re: Requesting comments on draft-cheney-safe-02.txt, Cheney, Edward A SSG RES USAR USARC
      • Re: Requesting comments on draft-cheney-safe-02.txt, Rich Kulawiec
  • Re: Requesting comments on draft-cheney-safe-02.txt, Rich Kulawiec
• current email address for John Myers?, Tony Hansen
• [Fwd: RFC 5598 on Internet Mail Architecture], Dave CROCKER
• [Fwd: Document Action: 'Internet Mail Architecture' to Informational RFC], Dave CROCKER
  • Re: [Fwd: Document Action: 'Internet Mail Architecture' to Informational RFC], David MacQuigg
• Re: [Fwd: More information requested on publication status of draft-crocker-email-arch], SM
• Re: [Fwd: More information requested on publication status of draft-crocker-email-arch], Dave CROCKER
• Re: [Fwd: More information requested on publication status of draft-crocker-email-arch], Pete Resnick
  • Re: [Fwd: More information requested on publication status of draft-crocker-email-arch], David MacQuigg
• More information requested on publication status of draft-crocker-email-arch, Alexey Melnikov
• Comments on draft-moonesamy-smtp-vrfy-ddds-00, Ray . Bellis
  • Message not available
    • Re: Comments on draft-moonesamy-smtp-vrfy-ddds-00, SM
• Email System Model, David MacQuigg
  • Re: Email System Model, Alessandro Vesely
    • Re: Email System Model, David MacQuigg
      • Re: Email System Model, Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: Email System Model, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: Email System Model, Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: Email System Model, Hector Santos
      • Re: Email System Model, Hector Santos
      • Re: Email System Model, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: Email System Model, John Levine
      • Re: Email System Model, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: Email System Model, John R Levine
      • Re: Email System Model, Arnt Gulbrandsen
      • Re: Email System Model, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: Email System Model, Russ Allbery
      • Re: Email System Model, Douglas Otis
      • Abort data transfer?, David MacQuigg
      • Re: Abort data transfer?, Steve Atkins
      • Re: Abort data transfer?, Dave CROCKER
      • SMTP and DKIM/POLICY Rejection Handling, Hector Santos
      • Re: SMTP and DKIM/POLICY Rejection Handling, Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: SMTP and DKIM/POLICY Rejection Handling, Hector Santos
      • Re: SMTP and DKIM/POLICY Rejection Handling, Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: SMTP and DKIM/POLICY Rejection Handling, Hector Santos
      • Re: SMTP and DKIM/POLICY Rejection Handling [OFF LIST], David MacQuigg
      • Re: Abort data transfer?, SM
      • Re: Abort data transfer?, Hector Santos
      • Re: Abort data transfer?, David MacQuigg
      • Re: Abort data transfer?, Arnt Gulbrandsen
      • Re: Abort data transfer?, SM
      • Re: Abort data transfer?, Hector Santos
      • Re: Abort data transfer?, SM
      • Re: Abort data transfer?, Sabahattin Gucukoglu
      • Re: Abort data transfer?, David MacQuigg
      • Re: Abort data transfer?, Sabahattin Gucukoglu
      • Re: Abort data transfer?, Hector Santos
      • Re: Abort data transfer?, Paul Smith
      • Re: Abort data transfer?, David MacQuigg
      • Re: Abort data transfer?, John Levine
      • Re: Abort data transfer?, Arnt Gulbrandsen
      • Re: Abort data transfer?, John R Levine
      • Re: Abort data transfer?, Paul Smith
      • Re: Abort data transfer?, John R Levine
      • Re: Abort data transfer?, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: Abort data transfer?, John R Levine

The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections to this Web page, please send them to phoffman@imc.org.