Archive of ietf-smtp, by thread

• [Fwd: Protocol Action: 'Internet Message Format' to Draft Standard], Tony Hansen
• Re: 2822upd approved, Tony Hansen
• Pipelining the DATA Command, Robert A. Rosenberg
  • Re: Pipelining the DATA Command, Glenn Anderson
  • Re: Pipelining the DATA Command, ned+ietf-smtp
• Improved straw man for retry scenarios, John Levine
  • Re: Improved straw man for retry scenarios, Frank Ellermann
  • Re: Improved straw man for retry scenarios, Hector Santos
    • Re: Improved straw man for retry scenarios, Glenn Anderson
      • Re: Improved straw man for retry scenarios, Hector Santos
      • Re: Improved straw man for retry scenarios, Glenn Anderson
      • Re: Improved straw man for retry scenarios, Hector Santos
      • Re: Improved straw man for retry scenarios, Glenn Anderson
      • Re: Improved straw man for retry scenarios, Hector Santos
      • Re: Improved straw man for retry scenarios, Glenn Anderson
      • Re: Improved straw man for retry scenarios, Hector Santos
      • Re: Improved straw man for retry scenarios, Glenn Anderson
      • Re: Improved straw man for retry scenarios, Hector Santos
      • Re: Improved straw man for retry scenarios, Glenn Anderson
      • Re: Improved straw man for retry scenarios, Hector Santos
      • Re: Improved straw man for retry scenarios, Glenn Anderson
      • Re: Improved straw man for retry scenarios, Hector Santos
      • DATA 554 responses - To Retry or Not., Hector Santos
      • Re: DATA 554 responses - To Retry or Not., ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: DATA 554 responses - To Retry or Not., Hector Santos
      • Re: DATA 554 responses - To Retry or Not., Glenn Anderson
      • Re: DATA 554 responses - To Retry or Not., Hector Santos
      • Re: DATA 554 responses - To Retry or Not., Paul Smith
      • Re: DATA 554 responses - To Retry or Not., Hector Santos
      • Re: DATA 554 responses - To Retry or Not., Paul Smith
      • Re: DATA 554 responses - To Retry or Not., ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: DATA 554 responses - To Retry or Not., Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: DATA 554 responses - To Retry or Not., Tony Finch
      • Re: DATA 554 responses - To Retry or Not., Glenn Anderson
      • Re: DATA 554 responses - To Retry or Not., Paul Smith
      • Re: DATA 554 responses - To Retry or Not., Hector Santos
      • Re: DATA 554 responses - To Retry or Not., Paul Smith
      • retries redux? was Re: DATA 554 responses - To Retry or Not., Tony Finch
      • Re: DATA 554 responses - To Retry or Not., Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: Improved straw man for retry scenarios, Hector Santos
• Forwarding in the face of spam, Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: Forwarding in the face of spam, Keith Moore
• retry question, Tony Finch
  • Message not available
    • Re: retry question, SM
      • Re: retry question, Tony Finch
      • Re: retry question, Hector Santos
      • Re: retry question, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: retry question, Hector Santos
      • Re: retry question, Robert A. Rosenberg
      • Message not available
      • Re: retry question, SM
      • Re: retry question, Hector Santos
      • Re: retry question, SM
      • Re: retry question, Hector Santos
      • Re: retry question, Robert A. Rosenberg
      • Re: retry question, SM
      • Re: retry question, Arnt Gulbrandsen
      • Re: retry question, Hector Santos
  • Re: retry question, ned+ietf-smtp
    • Re: retry question, Hector Santos
      • Re: retry question, Hector Santos
    • Re: retry question, Tony Finch
      • Re: retry question, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: retry question, Tony Finch
      • Re: retry question, Hector Santos
      • Re: retry question, Tony Finch
      • 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question), John C Klensin
      • Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question), John Levine
      • Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question), Richard Kay
      • Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question), John R Levine
      • Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question), ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question), Tony Finch
      • Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question), John R Levine
      • Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question), Tony Finch
      • Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question), Jeff Macdonald
      • Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question), John R Levine
      • Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question), ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question), Alex van den Bogaerdt
      • Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question), Robert A. Rosenberg
      • Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question), ned+ietf-smtp
      • Message not available
      • Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question), SM
      • Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question), Hector Santos
      • Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures, Tony Finch
      • Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures, Hector Santos
      • Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures, Richard Kay
      • Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures, Hector Santos
      • Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question), ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question), Paul Smith
      • Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question), Hector Santos
      • Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question), Alex van den Bogaerdt
      • Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question), Paul Smith
      • Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question), SM
      • Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question), Hector Santos
      • Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question), SM
      • Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures, Hector Santos
      • retry question (was: 2821bis/ter and procedures), SM
      • Re: retry question, Hector Santos
      • Re: retry question, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: retry question, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: retry question, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: retry question, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: retry question, John C Klensin
      • Re: retry question, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: retry question, SM
      • Re: retry question, Hector Santos
      • Re: retry question, John Leslie
      • Re: retry question, SM
      • Re: retry question, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: retry question, Hector Santos
      • Re: retry question, SM
      • SendMail follows a NO RETRY 5yz logic as defined by specs., Hector Santos
      • Re: SendMail follows a NO RETRY 5yz logic as defined by specs., Frank Ellermann
      • Re: SendMail follows a NO RETRY 5yz logic as defined by specs., Frank Ellermann
      • Re: SendMail follows a NO RETRY 5yz logic as defined by specs., Hector Santos
      • Re: SendMail follows a NO RETRY 5yz logic as defined by specs., Frank Ellermann
      • Re: SendMail follows a NO RETRY 5yz logic as defined by specs., Philip Guenther
      • Re: SendMail follows a NO RETRY 5yz logic as defined by specs., SM
      • Re: SendMail follows a NO RETRY 5yz logic as defined by specs., Philip Guenther
      • Re: retry question, Tony Finch
      • Re: retry question, Paul Smith
      • Re: retry question, Tony Finch
      • Re: retry question, SM
      • Re: retry question, ned+ietf-smtp
      • 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis), Hector Santos
      • Re: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis), Bill McQuillan
      • Re: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis), Hector Santos
      • Re: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis), John C Klensin
      • Re: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis), Hector Santos
      • Re: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis), ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis), Hector Santos
      • Re: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis), Glenn Anderson
      • 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) (was: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis)), Frank Ellermann
      • Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) (was: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis)), ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) (was: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis)), Hector Santos
      • Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) (was: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis)), ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) (was: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis)), Dave Crocker
      • Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) (was: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis)), Glenn Anderson
      • Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) (was: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis)), Hector Santos
      • Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) (was: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis)), Paul Smith
      • Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) (was: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis)), John C Klensin
      • Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) (was: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis)), Hector Santos
      • Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), Frank Ellermann
      • Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), Hector Santos
      • Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), Paul Smith
      • Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), Hector Santos
      • Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), John Leslie
      • Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), Hector Santos
      • Signalling to retry RCPTs separately, John Leslie
      • Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), Paul Smith
      • Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), Hector Santos
      • Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), John C Klensin
      • Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), Hector Santos
      • Message not available
      • Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), Bart Schaefer
      • Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), John C Klensin
      • Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), Tony Finch
      • Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), Frank Ellermann
      • Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), Tony Finch
      • Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), Frank Ellermann
      • Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), Bart Schaefer
      • Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), Tony Hansen
      • Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), Hector Santos
      • Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), John C Klensin
      • DATA reply codes - which ones?, Hector Santos
      • Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), John C Klensin
      • Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), Hector Santos
      • Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), John C Klensin
      • Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), Tony Finch
      • Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), Hector Santos
      • Retry Strategies, Hector Santos
      • Re: Retry Strategies, Paul Smith
      • Re: Retry Strategies, John C Klensin
      • Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), SM
      • Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) (was: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis)), SM
      • Re: retry question, SM
      • Re: retry question (was: 2821bis/ter and procedures), ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question), Alex van den Bogaerdt
      • Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question), Alex van den Bogaerdt
      • Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures, Paul Smith
      • Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures, Tony Finch
      • Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures, Hector Santos
      • Re: retry question, Tony Finch
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Retry question, Pete Resnick
    • Message not available
      • Re: Retry question, Bill McQuillan
      • Re: Retry question, Pete Resnick
      • Re: Retry question, Hector Santos
      • Re: Retry question, Pete Resnick
      • Re: Retry question, Hector Santos
    • Re: Retry question, Tony Finch
• mini BOF on mail standard maintenance, Tony Hansen
• FWD: ID Tracker State Update Notice: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, John C Klensin
• Unsticking rfc2821bis, John C Klensin
  • Re: Unsticking rfc2821bis, Tony Hansen
  • Re: Unsticking rfc2821bis, Dave Crocker
    • Who standardizes the standardization process? (was: Re: Unsticking rfc2821bis), Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: Unsticking rfc2821bis, Frank Ellermann
    • Re: Unsticking rfc2821bis, John C Klensin
      • Re: Unsticking rfc2821bis, Dave Crocker
      • Re: Unsticking rfc2821bis, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: Unsticking rfc2821bis, Lisa Dusseault
      • Re: Unsticking rfc2821bis, Dave Crocker
      • Re: Unsticking rfc2821bis, SM
      • Re: Unsticking rfc2821bis, Lisa Dusseault
      • Re: Unsticking rfc2821bis, Dave Crocker
      • Re: Unsticking rfc2821bis, SM
      • Re: Unsticking rfc2821bis, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: Unsticking rfc2821bis, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: Unsticking rfc2821bis, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: Unsticking rfc2821bis, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: Unsticking rfc2821bis, SM
  • Re: Unsticking rfc2821bis, SM
  • Approved (was: Unsticking rfc2821bis), Frank Ellermann
    • Re: Approved (was: Unsticking rfc2821bis), John C Klensin
• rfc2821bis-11 posted -- contents and status report, John C Klensin
  • Re: rfc2821bis-11 posted -- contents and status report, Tony Hansen
    • Re: rfc2821bis-11 posted -- contents and status report, John C Klensin
  • Re: rfc2821bis-11 posted -- contents and status report, SM
    • Re: rfc2821bis-11 posted -- contents and status report, John C Klensin
• Auto-Submitted and Autosubmitted, =?utf-8?b?0JTQuNC70Y/QvSDQn9Cw0LvQsNGD0LfQvtCy?=
  • Re: Auto-Submitted and Autosubmitted, ned+ietf-smtp
    • Re: Auto-Submitted and Autosubmitted, Pete Resnick
      • Re: Auto-Submitted and Autosubmitted, Frank Ellermann
• Re: I-D Action:draft-hathcock-minger-05.txt, Frank Ellermann
• Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008, IESG Secretary
  • Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008, Tony Hansen
    • Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008, Jim Fenton
    • Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008, Dave Crocker
      • Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008, Keld Jørn Simonsen
      • Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008, Tony Finch
    • IESG response fixes for 2821bis, Tony Hansen
      • Re: IESG response fixes for 2821bis, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: IESG response fixes for 2821bis, John C Klensin
      • Re: IESG response fixes for 2821bis, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: IESG response fixes for 2821bis, Tony Hansen
      • Re: IESG response fixes for 2821bis, Magnus Westerlund
      • Re: IESG response fixes for 2821bis, Tony Hansen
      • Re: IESG response fixes for 2821bis, SM
    • Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008, SM
      • borderline offtopic about examples, Arnt Gulbrandsen
      • Re: borderline offtopic about examples, John C Klensin
      • Re: borderline offtopic about examples, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: borderline offtopic about examples, Arnt Gulbrandsen
      • Re: borderline offtopic about examples, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: borderline offtopic about examples, SM
      • Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008, Steve Atkins
    • Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008, Arnt Gulbrandsen
      • Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008, Alexey Melnikov
      • More new text for 2821bis (was: Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008), John C Klensin
      • Re: More new text for 2821bis, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: More new text for 2821bis, Keith Moore
      • Re: More new text for 2821bis, John C Klensin
      • Re: More new text for 2821bis, Keith Moore
      • Re: More new text for 2821bis, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: More new text for 2821bis, John C Klensin
      • Re: More new text for 2821bis, SM
      • Re: More new text for 2821bis (was: Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008), Pete Resnick
      • Re: More new text for 2821bis (was: Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008), John Leslie
      • Re: More new text for 2821bis (was: Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008), John C Klensin
      • Re: More new text for 2821bis (was: Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008), ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: More new text for 2821bis (was: Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008), SM
      • Re: More new text for 2821bis (was: Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008), John C Klensin
      • Re: More new text for 2821bis (was: Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008), SM
      • Re: More new text for 2821bis (was: Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008), John C Klensin
      • Re: More new text for 2821bis (was: Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008), Chris Newman
    • Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008, Hector Santos
    • Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008, Alessandro Vesely
    • Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008, Keith Moore
    • Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008, John Leslie
      • Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008, Francesco Gennai
      • Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008, Francesco Gennai
    • Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008, Cyrus Daboo
    • Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008, Chris Newman
• draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10: ABNF discuss, Magnus Westerlund
  • Re: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10: ABNF discuss, Frank Ellermann
  • Standardized tag (was: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10: ABNF discuss), SM
    • Re: Standardized tag (was: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10: ABNF discuss), John Leslie
      • Re: Standardized tag (was: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10: ABNF discuss), John C Klensin
      • Re: Standardized tag (was: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10: ABNF discuss), SM
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10: ABNF discuss, Magnus Westerlund
    • Re: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10: ABNF discuss, John C Klensin
      • Re: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10: ABNF discuss, Magnus Westerlund
      • Re: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10: ABNF discuss, John C Klensin
• An interesting proposal for SMTP, 'Stephane Bortzmeyer'
• name and filename parameters, Francesco Gennai
  • Re: name and filename parameters, Keith Moore
  • Re: name and filename parameters, ned+ietf-smtp
    • Re: name and filename parameters, Francesco Gennai
• Handling of Missing Required Fields, Hector Santos
  • Re: Handling of Missing Required Fields, SM
  • Re: Handling of Missing Required Fields, Pete Resnick
    • Re: Handling of Missing Required Fields, Arnt Gulbrandsen
      • Re: Handling of Missing Required Fields, Pete Resnick
      • Re: Handling of Missing Required Fields, Hector Santos
• IESG approval status of rfc2821bis, John C Klensin
  • Re: IESG approval status of rfc2821bis, Dave Crocker
    • Re: IESG approval status of rfc2821bis, Keith Moore
  • Re: IESG approval status of rfc2821bis, Keith Moore
  • Re: IESG approval status of rfc2821bis, Arnt Gulbrandsen
  • Re: IESG approval status of rfc2821bis, Frank Ellermann
    • New 2606bis draft (was: IESG approval status of rfc2821bis), Frank Ellermann
  • Re: IESG approval status of rfc2821bis, SM
  • Re: IESG approval status of rfc2821bis, John Leslie
    • Re: IESG approval status of rfc2821bis, John C Klensin
    • Re: IESG approval status of rfc2821bis, Pete Resnick
      • Re: IESG approval status of rfc2821bis, Keith Moore
      • Re: IESG approval status of rfc2821bis, Pete Resnick
      • Re: IESG approval status of rfc2821bis, Lisa Dusseault
      • Re: IESG approval status of rfc2821bis, John C Klensin
      • Re: IESG approval status of rfc2821bis, Keith Moore
      • Re: IESG approval status of rfc2821bis, Lisa Dusseault
• Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, Hector Santos
  • Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, John C Klensin
    • Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, SM
      • Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, John Levine
      • Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, Tony Finch
      • Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, Arnt Gulbrandsen
      • Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, Tony Finch
      • Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, John Levine
      • Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, Hector Santos
      • Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, Arnt Gulbrandsen
      • Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, John Levine
      • Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, Robert A. Rosenberg
      • Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, John C Klensin
      • Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, Hector Santos
      • Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, ned+ietf-smtp
  • Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, Robert A. Rosenberg
    • Message not available
      • Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, Bill McQuillan
    • Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, Paul Smith
      • Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, Tony Finch
      • Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, Paul Smith
      • Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, Tony Finch
      • Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, ned+ietf-smtp
• Existing email address meta-syntax standards, especially GSTN, Dave Crocker
  • Re: Existing email address meta-syntax standards, especially GSTN, Douglas Otis
    • Re: Existing email address meta-syntax standards, especially GSTN, Douglas Otis
      • Re: Existing email address meta-syntax standards, especially GSTN, John Levine
      • Re: Existing email address meta-syntax standards, especially GSTN, Douglas Otis
• Lose the time stamp in BATV, John R Levine
  • Re: Lose the time stamp in BATV, Carl S. Gutekunst
  • Re: Lose the time stamp in BATV, Paul Smith
  • Re: Lose the time stamp in BATV, Peter J. Holzer
    • Mailing Lists v. BATV, John Leslie
      • Re: Mailing Lists v. BATV, Peter J. Holzer
• SMTP metadata transfer, Paul Smith
  • Re: SMTP metadata transfer, Tony Finch
    • Re: SMTP metadata transfer, Alexey Melnikov
      • Re: SMTP metadata transfer, Tony Finch
      • Re: SMTP metadata transfer, Alexey Melnikov
      • Re: SMTP metadata transfer, Paul Smith
• Specification "NOTE" paragraphs and normative language, Dave Crocker
  • Re: Specification "NOTE" paragraphs and normative language, Bill McQuillan
    • Re: Specification "NOTE" paragraphs and normative language, Tony Hansen
  • Re: Specification "NOTE" paragraphs and normative language, Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: Specification "NOTE" paragraphs and normative language, SM
  • Re: Specification "NOTE" paragraphs and normative language, John C Klensin
    • Re: Specification "NOTE" paragraphs and normative language, Dave Crocker
      • Re: Specification "NOTE" paragraphs and normative language, John C Klensin
• BATV pseudo-Last Call, Dave Crocker
  • RE: BATV pseudo-Last Call, Dan Wing
    • Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, John Levine
      • Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, John R Levine
      • Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, John R Levine
      • Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, Dave Crocker
      • Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, Jeff Macdonald
      • Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, Peter J. Holzer
      • Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, SM
      • Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, John Levine
      • Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, Tony Finch
      • Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, Hector Santos
      • Re: BATV doesn't fix forwarding, Alessandro Vesely
      • smarthosts, Tony Finch
      • Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, mouss
      • Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, John Levine
      • Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, Dave Crocker
      • Re: public key BATV isn't useful, John Levine
      • Re: public key BATV isn't useful, Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: public key BATV isn't useful, Paul Smith
      • Re: private key BATV is useful, John R Levine
      • Re: private key BATV is useful, Paul Smith
      • Re: private key BATV is useful, mouss
      • Re: private key BATV is useful, John R Levine
      • Re: private key BATV is useful, mouss
      • Re: public key BATV isn't useful, Tony Hansen
      • Re: public key BATV isn't useful, Paul Smith
      • Re: public key BATV isn't useful, Dave Crocker
      • Re: public key BATV isn't useful, Paul Smith
      • Re: public key BATV isn't useful, Paul Smith
      • Re: public key BATV isn't useful, Douglas Otis
      • Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, John Levine
      • Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, Dave Crocker
      • Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, Dave Crocker
      • Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, John Levine
      • Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, Tony Hansen
      • Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, SM
      • Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, Paul Smith
      • Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, mouss
      • Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, Paul Smith
      • Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, John Leslie
      • Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, John Levine
      • Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, John Levine
      • Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, Philip Guenther
      • Re: vacation programs, was BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, John R Levine
      • Re: vacation programs, was BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, Philip Guenther
      • Re: vacation programs, was BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: vacation programs, was BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, mouss
      • Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, Robert A. Rosenberg
      • Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, Philip Guenther
      • Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, Dave Crocker
      • Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, Robert A. Rosenberg
      • Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, Tony Hansen
      • Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, Tony Hansen
      • Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, Tony Finch
      • Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, Tony Finch
      • Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, Tony Finch
      • Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, Carl S. Gutekunst
      • Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, Douglas Otis
      • Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, Tony Finch
      • Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, Douglas Otis
      • Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: remote signing, was BATV pseudo-Last Call, John Levine
      • Re: remote signing, was BATV pseudo-Last Call, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: remote signing, was BATV pseudo-Last Call, John R Levine
      • Re: remote signing, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: remote signing, was BATV pseudo-Last Call, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: remote signing, was BATV pseudo-Last Call, John R Levine
      • Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, Peter J. Holzer
      • BATV smtp extension, Dave Crocker
  • Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, Steve Atkins
  • Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, Frank Ellermann
• Preferred Originator, Santoshkumar K S
• Additional parameters to SMTP commands, Santoshkumar K S
  • Re: Additional parameters to SMTP commands, John C Klensin
  • Re: Additional parameters to SMTP commands, Sabahattin Gucukoglu
• MX lookup error handling change, Tony Finch
  • Re: MX lookup error handling change, Hector Santos
  • Re: MX lookup error handling change, Robert A. Rosenberg
    • Re: MX lookup error handling change, Tony Finch
      • Re: MX lookup error handling change, Sabahattin Gucukoglu
  • Re: MX lookup error handling change, SM
    • Re: MX lookup error handling change, Tony Finch
• Forwarding in SMTP, Santoshkumar K S
• Queued Mail or Unreturnable Mail?, Sabahattin Gucukoglu
  • Re: Queued Mail or Unreturnable Mail?, John Leslie
    • Re: Queued Mail or Unreturnable Mail?, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: Queued Mail or Unreturnable Mail?, Douglas Otis
    • Re: Queued Mail or Unreturnable Mail?, Robert A. Rosenberg
      • Re: Queued Mail or Unreturnable Mail?, John Leslie
      • Re: Queued Mail or Unreturnable Mail?, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: Queued Mail or Unreturnable Mail?, Douglas Otis
      • Re: Queued Mail or Unreturnable Mail?, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: Queued Mail or Unreturnable Mail?, Douglas Otis
      • Re: Queued Mail or Unreturnable Mail?, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: SPF instead of MX? was:Queued Mail or Unreturnable Mail?, Douglas Otis
  • Re: Queued Mail or Unreturnable Mail?, Hector Santos
    • Re: Queued Mail or Unreturnable Mail?, Sabahattin Gucukoglu
      • Re: Queued Mail or Unreturnable Mail?, Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: Queued Mail or Unreturnable Mail?, Sabahattin Gucukoglu
      • Re: Queued Mail or Unreturnable Mail?, Douglas Otis
      • Re: Queued Mail or Unreturnable Mail?, Hector Santos
      • Re: Queued Mail or Unreturnable Mail?, Hector Santos
• Interesting Thread regarding unexpected MX lookups., Hector Santos
• RFC2821bis-10 S5.1 Revision: "Unusable" MXs, Sabahattin Gucukoglu
  • Re: RFC2821bis-10 S5.1 Revision: "Unusable" MXs, Robert A. Rosenberg
• Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Tony Hansen
  • Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Arnt Gulbrandsen
    • Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, SM
      • Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Arnt Gulbrandsen
      • Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, SM
      • Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Arnt Gulbrandsen

The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections to this Web page, please send them to phoffman@imc.org.