Archive of ietf-smtp, by thread

• Proprietary or non-standard SMTP AUTH mechanisms, Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: Proprietary or non-standard SMTP AUTH mechanisms, Alexey Melnikov
    • Re: Proprietary or non-standard SMTP AUTH mechanisms, John C Klensin
      • Re: Proprietary or non-standard SMTP AUTH mechanisms, Alexey Melnikov
  • Re: Proprietary or non-standard SMTP AUTH mechanisms, Hector Santos
    • RE: Proprietary or non-standard SMTP AUTH mechanisms, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: Proprietary or non-standard SMTP AUTH mechanisms, Hector Santos
• FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-greylisting-00.txt, Murray S. Kucherawy
• Mail, not to be confused with spam..., Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: Mail, not to be confused with spam..., SM
    • Re: Mail, not to be confused with spam..., Paul Smith
  • RE: Mail, not to be confused with spam..., Murray S. Kucherawy
    • Re: Mail, not to be confused with spam..., Rolf E. Sonneveld
  • Re: Mail, not to be confused with spam..., Hector Santos
  • Re: Mail, not to be confused with spam..., Arnt Gulbrandsen
  • Re: Mail, not to be confused with spam..., Frank Ellermann
    • Re: Mail, not to be confused with spam..., John Levine
      • Re: Mail, not to be confused with spam..., Tony Finch
      • Re: Mail, not to be confused with spam..., Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: Mail, not to be confused with spam..., Hector Santos
      • Re: Mail, not to be confused with spam..., Dave CROCKER
      • Re: Mail, not to be confused with spam..., Douglas Otis
    • Re: Mail, not to be confused with spam..., Douglas Otis
      • Re: Mail, not to be confused with spam..., Rich Kulawiec
      • Re: Mail, not to be confused with spam..., Douglas Otis
• FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Hector Santos
  • Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Hector Santos
    • Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Bill McQuillan
      • Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Tony Finch
      • RE: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Hector Santos
      • Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Tony Finch
      • RE: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Bill McQuillan
      • Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Bill McQuillan
      • RE: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Hector
      • Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Bill McQuillan
      • RE: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • RE: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, John Levine
      • RE: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, John Levine
      • RE: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Dave CROCKER
      • RE: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Dave CROCKER
      • RE: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Rolf E. Sonneveld
      • Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Robert A. Rosenberg
      • RE: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Message not available
      • RE: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Robert A. Rosenberg
      • Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Carl S. Gutekunst
      • RE: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • RE: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Carl S. Gutekunst
      • Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Hector Santos
      • Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, John Levine
      • Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, John Levine
      • RE: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Tony Finch
      • Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Hector Santos
      • RE: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Tony Finch
      • Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Dave CROCKER
• Re: [apps-discuss] Feedback on draft-moonesamy-smtp-ipv6-00, Frank Ellermann
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [apps-discuss] Feedback on draft-moonesamy-smtp-ipv6-00, Murray S. Kucherawy
• Any interest in rigorous definition for SSL certificate verification in SMTP?, Carl S. Gutekunst
  • Re: Any interest in rigorous definition for SSL certificate verification in SMTP?, Arnt Gulbrandsen
  • Re: Any interest in rigorous definition for SSL certificate verification in SMTP?, Dave CROCKER
    • Re: Any interest in rigorous definition for SSL certificate verification in SMTP?, SM
      • Re: Any interest in rigorous definition for SSL certificate verification in SMTP?, Carl S. Gutekunst
    • Re: Any interest in rigorous definition for SSL certificate verification in SMTP?, Carl S. Gutekunst
      • Re: Any interest in rigorous definition for SSL certificate verification in SMTP?, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: Any interest in rigorous definition for SSL certificate verification in SMTP?, Carl S. Gutekunst
      • Re: Any interest in rigorous definition for SSL certificate verification in SMTP?, Alexey Melnikov
      • Re: Any interest in rigorous definition for SSL certificate verification in SMTP?, Carl S. Gutekunst
      • SMTP TLS and CN Domain Matching, Hector Santos
      • Re: Any interest in rigorous definition for SSL certificate verification in SMTP?, Robert A. Rosenberg
      • Re: Any interest in rigorous definition for SSL certificate verification in SMTP?, Carl S. Gutekunst
      • Re: Any interest in rigorous definition for SSL certificate verification in SMTP?, Alexey Melnikov
      • Re: Any interest in rigorous definition for SSL certificate verification in SMTP?, Alexey Melnikov
      • Re: Any interest in rigorous definition for SSL certificate verification in SMTP?, Tony Finch
      • Re: Any interest in rigorous definition for SSL certificate verification in SMTP?, Alexey Melnikov
  • Re: Any interest in rigorous definition for SSL certificate verification in SMTP?, Tony Finch
    • Re: Any interest in rigorous definition for SSL certificate verification in SMTP?, Carl S. Gutekunst
      • Re: Any interest in rigorous definition for SSL certificate verification in SMTP?, Tony Finch
    • Re: Any interest in rigorous definition for SSL certificate verification in SMTP?, Mark Andrews
  • Re: Any interest in rigorous definition for SSL certificate verification in SMTP?, Hector Santos
• Re: SMTP traffic control, Robert A. Rosenberg
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: SMTP traffic control, John C Klensin
• draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Steve Atkins
  • Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Hector Santos
    • Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Paul Smith
  • Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Peter J. Holzer
    • Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Hector Santos
      • Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Peter J. Holzer
    • Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Robert A. Rosenberg
      • Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Hector Santos
  • Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Peter J. Holzer
  • Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Peter J. Holzer
    • Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Steve Atkins
  • Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Tony Finch
    • Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Steve Atkins
      • Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Tony Finch
      • Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Steve Atkins
      • RE: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Douglas Otis
      • Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Mark Andrews
      • Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Douglas Otis
      • Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Steve Atkins
      • SMTP Kerberos support, Hector Santos
      • Re: SMTP Kerberos support, Douglas Otis
      • Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Steve Atkins
      • Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Tony Finch
      • Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, John C Klensin
      • Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Steve Atkins
      • Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, John Levine
      • Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Tim Kehres
      • Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, John C Klensin
      • Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Douglas Otis
      • Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, John C Klensin
      • Re: smtp-traffic-control, Douglas Otis
      • Re: smtp-traffic-control, Keith Moore
      • Re: smtp-traffic-control, Russ Allbery
      • SMTP Kerberos Considerations, Hector Santos
      • Re: SMTP Kerberos Considerations, Russ Allbery
      • Re: SMTP Kerberos Considerations, Paul Smith
      • Re: SMTP Kerberos Considerations, Russ Allbery
      • Re: SMTP Kerberos Considerations, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: SMTP Kerberos Considerations, Keith Moore
      • Re: SMTP Kerberos Considerations, Russ Allbery
      • Re: SMTP Kerberos Considerations, Robert A. Rosenberg
      • Re: SMTP Kerberos Considerations, Hector Santos
      • Re: SMTP Kerberos Considerations, Robert A. Rosenberg
      • SMTP and Kerberos (was: Re: smtp-traffic-control), John C Klensin
      • Re: SMTP and Kerberos, Douglas Otis
      • Re: SMTP and Kerberos, Hector Santos
      • Re: SMTP and Kerberos, Douglas Otis
      • Re: SMTP and Kerberos, Hector Santos
      • Re: SMTP and Kerberos, Douglas Otis
      • Re: SMTP and Kerberos, Douglas Otis
      • Re: SMTP and Kerberos, Russ Allbery
      • Re: retrying very often (was: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control), Claus Assmann
  • Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Alessandro Vesely
• new draft: draft-santos-smtpgrey-01, Hector
  • Re: new draft: draft-santos-smtpgrey-01, Tim Kehres
    • Re: new draft: draft-santos-smtpgrey-01, John C Klensin
      • Re: new draft: draft-santos-smtpgrey-01, Tim Kehres
      • Putting it all together, Hector Santos
      • Re: Putting it all together, Paul Smith
      • Re: Putting it all together, Hector Santos
      • Re: Putting it all together, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: Putting it all together, Hector Santos
      • Re: new draft: draft-santos-smtpgrey-01, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: new draft: draft-santos-smtpgrey-01, Keith Moore
      • Re: new draft: draft-santos-smtpgrey-01, Tony Finch
      • Re: new draft: draft-santos-smtpgrey-01, Hector Santos
      • Re: new draft: draft-santos-smtpgrey-01, Tony Finch
      • Re: new draft: draft-santos-smtpgrey-01, Hector Santos
      • Re: new draft: draft-santos-smtpgrey-01, Peter J. Holzer
      • Re: new draft: draft-santos-smtpgrey-01, Paul Smith
      • Re: new draft: draft-santos-smtpgrey-01, Hector Santos
      • Re: new draft: draft-santos-smtpgrey-01, Hector
      • RE: new draft: draft-santos-smtpgrey-01, Murray S. Kucherawy
    • Re: new draft: draft-santos-smtpgrey-01, Hector
• Received header field for special processing, such as "held for moderation"., Dave CROCKER
  • Re: Received header field for special processing, such as "held for moderation"., Carl S. Gutekunst
    • Re: Received header field for special processing, such as "held for moderation"., Dave CROCKER
      • Re: Received header field for special processing, such as "held for moderation"., Rolf E. Sonneveld
      • Re: Received header field for special processing, such as "held for moderation"., Dave CROCKER
      • Re: Received header field for special processing, such as "held for moderation"., John C Klensin
  • RE: Received header field for special processing, such as "held for moderation"., Murray S. Kucherawy
    • Re: Received header field for special processing, such as "held for moderation"., Paul Smith
      • Re: Received header field for special processing, such as "held for moderation"., Dave CROCKER
      • RE: Received header field for special processing, such as "held for moderation"., Murray S. Kucherawy
    • Re: Received header field for special processing, such as "held for moderation"., Hector
  • Re: Received header field for special processing, such as "held for moderation"., Frank Ellermann
  • Re: Received header field for special processing, such as "held for moderation"., SM
  • Re: Received header field for special processing, such as "held for moderation"., Keith Moore
  • Re: Received header field for special processing, such as "held for moderation"., Hector
• I-D SMTP Extension for Greylisting, Hector
  • Re: I-D SMTP Extension for Greylisting, Hector
    • Re: retry=delay (was: I-D SMTP Extension for Greylisting), Claus Assmann
      • Re: retry=delay, Hector
    • Re: I-D SMTP Extension for Greylisting, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: I-D SMTP Extension for Greylisting, Hector
      • Re: I-D SMTP Extension for Greylisting, Frank Ellermann
      • retry=min/max syntax, Hector
      • Re: I-D SMTP Extension for Greylisting, Hector
      • Re: I-D SMTP Extension for Greylisting, Frank Ellermann
      • retry=min-max [was Re: I-D SMTP Extension for Greylisting], Hector
  • Re: retry= (was: I-D SMTP Extension for Greylisting), Claus Assmann
    • Re: retry=, Hector
      • Re: retry=, Hector
      • Re: retry=, Frank Ellermann
• draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Pete Resnick
    • RE: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Murray S. Kucherawy
    • Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Keith Moore
      • Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Pete Resnick
      • Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Pete Resnick
      • Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Pete Resnick
      • Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Keith Moore
      • Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Hector
      • Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Dave CROCKER
      • 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Hector Santos
      • Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, John C Klensin
      • Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Hector Santos
      • Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, SM
      • Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Hector Santos
      • RE: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Carl S. Gutekunst
      • RE: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, John C Klensin
      • Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Hector Santos
      • Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Carl S. Gutekunst
      • Per-session SMTP extensions (was: Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol), John C Klensin
      • Re: Per-session SMTP extensions, Carl S. Gutekunst
      • Re: Per-session SMTP extensions (was: Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol), Peter J. Holzer
      • Re: Per-session SMTP extensions (was: Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol), John C Klensin
      • Re: Per-session SMTP extensions (was: Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol), Robert A. Rosenberg
      • Re: Per-session SMTP extensions (was: Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol), Peter J. Holzer
      • Re: Per-session SMTP extensions, Hector Santos
      • Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Paul Smith
      • Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Hector Santos
      • Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, John C Klensin
      • Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Robert A. Rosenberg
      • Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, John C Klensin
      • Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Hector Santos
      • Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Paul Smith
      • Message not available
      • RE: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, SM
      • RE: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Proposal: SMTP Ext - Base protocol for structured responses, Hector Santos
      • Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Robert A. Rosenberg
      • Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Hector Santos
      • Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, John C Klensin
      • Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Hector Santos
      • Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Peter J. Holzer
      • Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Jeff Macdonald
      • Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Steve Atkins
      • Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Tim Kehres
      • RE: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, John C Klensin
      • RE: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Pete Resnick
      • Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Pete Resnick
• We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector
  • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Keith Moore
    • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Keith Moore
    • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Keith Moore
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Carl S. Gutekunst
      • RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Murray S. Kucherawy
    • RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Steve Atkins
      • RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Keith Moore
      • RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Keith Moore
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Paul Smith
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector
      • RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Steve Atkins
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Richard Kulawiec
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, John Levine
      • Greylisting retry hints, Hector
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, John Levine
      • RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Tim Kehres
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Arnt Gulbrandsen
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Keith Moore
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Keith Moore
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Paul Smith
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, John Levine
      • SMTP traffic control (was Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Steve Atkins
      • Re: SMTP traffic control (was Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector
      • Re: SMTP traffic control, Claus Assmann
      • Re: SMTP traffic control, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: SMTP traffic control, Keith Moore
      • RE: SMTP traffic control, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: SMTP traffic control, Douglas Otis
      • Re: SMTP traffic control, Claus Assmann
      • Re: SMTP traffic control, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: SMTP traffic control, SM
      • Re: SMTP traffic control, Robert A. Rosenberg
      • Re: SMTP traffic control, Hector
      • RE: SMTP traffic control, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • RE: SMTP traffic control, Rosenwald, Jordan
      • RE: SMTP traffic control, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • RE: SMTP traffic control, Rosenwald, Jordan
      • RE: SMTP traffic control, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • RE: SMTP traffic control, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: SMTP traffic control, Paul Smith
      • Re: SMTP traffic control, Hector
      • Re: SMTP traffic control, Paul Smith
      • Re: SMTP traffic control, Peter J. Holzer
      • Re: SMTP traffic control, Paul Smith
      • Re: SMTP traffic control, Russ Allbery
      • Re: SMTP traffic control, Robert A. Rosenberg
      • RE: SMTP traffic control, MH Michael Hammer (5304)
      • RE: SMTP traffic control, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: SMTP traffic control, Keith Moore
      • Re: SMTP traffic control, Carl S. Gutekunst
      • Re: SMTP traffic control, Carl S. Gutekunst
      • Re: SMTP traffic control, Hector
      • Re: SMTP traffic control, Carl S. Gutekunst
      • Re: SMTP traffic control, Hector
      • Re: SMTP traffic control, Keith Moore
      • RE: SMTP traffic control, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: SMTP traffic control, Paul Smith
      • Re: SMTP traffic control, Peter J. Holzer
      • Re: SMTP traffic control, Rosenwald, Jordan
      • Re: SMTP traffic control, Steve Atkins
      • Re: SMTP traffic control, Carl S. Gutekunst
      • Re: SMTP traffic control, Claus Assmann
      • Re: SMTP traffic control, Steve Atkins
      • Re: SMTP traffic control, Douglas Otis
      • Re: SMTP traffic control, Tim Kehres
      • Re: SMTP traffic control, Hector Santos
      • Re: SMTP traffic control, Carl S. Gutekunst
      • Re: SMTP traffic control, Hector Santos
      • Re: SMTP traffic control, Steve Atkins
      • Re: SMTP traffic control, Carl S. Gutekunst
      • Server Enforcement of Time Blocks (wait=), Hector Santos
      • Re: Server Enforcement of Time Blocks (wait=), Steve Atkins
      • Re: Server Enforcement of Time Blocks (wait=), Hector Santos
      • Re: Server Enforcement of Time Blocks (wait=), Peter J. Holzer
      • Re: Server Enforcement of Time Blocks (wait=), Hector Santos
      • Re: Server Enforcement of Time Blocks (wait=), Peter J. Holzer
      • Re: Server Enforcement of Time Blocks (wait=), Carl S. Gutekunst
      • Re: Server Enforcement of Time Blocks (wait=), Hector Santos
      • Re: Server Enforcement of Time Blocks (wait=), Carl S. Gutekunst
      • Re: Server Enforcement of Time Blocks (wait=), Hector Santos
      • RE: Server Enforcement of Time Blocks (wait=), Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: SMTP traffic control, Peter J. Holzer
      • Re: SMTP traffic control, Rosenwald, Jordan
      • Re: SMTP traffic control, Peter J. Holzer
      • Re: SMTP traffic control, Hector Santos
      • RE: SMTP traffic control, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: SMTP traffic control, Peter J. Holzer
      • Re: SMTP traffic control, SM
      • RE: SMTP traffic control, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: SMTP traffic control, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: SMTP traffic control, Arnt Gulbrandsen
      • Re: SMTP traffic control, John C Klensin
      • Re: SMTP traffic control, Keith Moore
      • Re: SMTP traffic control, Hector
      • Re: SMTP traffic control, Claus Assmann
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Paul Smith
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Richard Kulawiec
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Richard Kulawiec
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector Santos
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Richard Kulawiec
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Keith Moore
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Keith Moore
      • Message not available
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector
      • Message not available
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Paul Smith
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector
      • RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector
      • RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, John C Klensin
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Douglas Otis
      • Trusted agency (was: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING), SM
      • Re: Trusted agency (was: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING), John Leslie
      • Re: Trusted agency, Douglas Otis
      • Re: Trusted agency, SM
      • Re: Trusted agency, Douglas Otis
      • Re: Trusted agency, SM
      • Re: Trusted agency, Russ Allbery
      • Re: Trusted agency (was: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING), Richard Kulawiec
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Richard Kulawiec
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Valdis . Kletnieks
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, John Levine
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Steve Atkins
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Douglas Otis
      • Message not available
      • RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Robert A. Rosenberg
      • Mailing lists and GREY LISTING, =?utf-8?b?0JTQuNC70Y/QvSDQn9Cw0LvQsNGD0LfQvtCy?=
      • Re: Mailing lists and GREY LISTING, Dave CROCKER
    • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Richard Kulawiec
      • RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, John Levine
  • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Rosenwald, Jordan
  • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, John Levine
  • Message not available
    • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector
  • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector
    • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Keith Moore
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Keith Moore
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Keith Moore
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector
      • RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector
      • RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Paul Smith
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Keith Moore
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Richard Kulawiec
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Tim Kehres
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Rolf E. Sonneveld
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Keith Moore
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Keith Moore
      • RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Rosenwald, Jordan
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Keith Moore
      • RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Rosenwald, Jordan
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Derek J. Balling
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Keith Moore
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Douglas Otis
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector
      • RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Murray S. Kucherawy
    • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Rosenwald, Jordan
    • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector
      • RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Rosenwald, Jordan
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector
      • Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Tim Kehres
• How aggressively to reject Pipelining errors?, Carl S. Gutekunst
  • Re: How aggressively to reject Pipelining errors?, Tony Finch
  • Re: How aggressively to reject Pipelining errors?, Julien ÉLIE
    • Re: How aggressively to reject Pipelining errors?, Carl S. Gutekunst
  • Re: How aggressively to reject Pipelining errors?, Paul Smith
    • Re: How aggressively to reject Pipelining errors?, ned+ietf-smtp
• 400 defer, Hector
  • Re: 400 defer, SM
    • Re: 400 defer, John C Klensin
      • Re: 400 defer, Hector
      • Re: 400 defer, Carl S. Gutekunst
      • Re: 400 defer, Arnt Gulbrandsen
  • Re: 400 defer, Carl S. Gutekunst
  • Re: 400 defer, Keith Moore
• The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Arnt Gulbrandsen
  • Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Valdis . Kletnieks
    • RE: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Rosenwald, Jordan
      • RE: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Keith Moore
      • Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Keith Moore
      • RE: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Tony Finch
      • Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Dave CROCKER
    • RE: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Storz, Michael
      • Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Keith Moore
      • RE: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Storz, Michael
      • Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Keith Moore
      • Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Hector
      • Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Keith Moore
      • RE: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Rosenwald, Jordan
      • Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Keith Moore
      • Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Derek J. Balling
      • Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Keith Moore
      • Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Derek J. Balling
      • Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Douglas Otis
      • Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, John Levine
      • Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Rolf E. Sonneveld
      • Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Carl S. Gutekunst
      • Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Douglas Otis
      • RE: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Storz, Michael
      • Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Paul Smith
• Received: and sending IP, Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: Received: and sending IP, Frank Ellermann
    • RE: Received: and sending IP, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • RE: Received: and sending IP, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: Received: and sending IP, Rolf E. Sonneveld
      • Re: Received: and sending IP, ned+ietf-smtp
      • RE: Received: and sending IP, Murray S. Kucherawy
      • RE: Received: and sending IP, ned+ietf-smtp
      • Re: Received: and sending IP, Hector Santos

The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections to this Web page, please send them to phoffman@imc.org.