Archive of ietf-smtp/old-archive, by date

Go to thread index
Go to main page for ietf-smtp/old-archive

Page 4 of 5
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page] [Last Page]

Letter on use of C0 codespace, Greg Vaudreuil, Fri, 19 Jul 91 16:44:05 EDT
8 bit mail demonstration list, Robert Ullmann, Fri, 12 Jul 91 20:51:53 EDT
Review and future directions, Greg Vaudreuil, Fri, 12 Jul 91 14:27:48 EDT
RFC-ZZZZ revisions, John C Klensin, Wed, 10 Jul 91 13:17:37 EDT
Re: Minutes of the June 21 meeting, Erik M. van der Poel, Tue, 9 Jul 91 01:59:43 EDT
Minutes of the June 21 meeting, Greg Vaudreuil, Mon, 8 Jul 91 20:19:01 EDT
unsubscribe, Anders Johansson, Mon, 1 Jul 91 04:22:06 EDT
Logistics information for the next meetings., Greg Vaudreuil, Fri, 28 Jun 91 08:09:08 EDT
Copenhagen logistics, Greg Vaudreuil, Sat, 15 Jun 91 12:07:19 EDT
8 bit transport (RFC-ZZZZ) clarifications, John C Klensin, Thu, 13 Jun 91 13:15:19 EDT
Re: Sticking out neck: why specify conversions ?, Keith Moore, Mon, 10 Jun 91 15:51:09 EDT
Re: Sticking out neck: why specify conversions ?, Eliot, Mon, 10 Jun 91 13:46:29 EDT
Re: Sticking out neck: why specify conversions ?, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Mon, 10 Jun 91 05:04:27 EDT
Sticking out neck: why specify conversions ?, Paul Svensson, Mon, 10 Jun 91 03:45:34 EDT
Re: Eight bit SMTP and translations, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Sun, 9 Jun 91 17:38:48 EDT
8-bit mailboxes, hostnames, and header keywords, David Robinson, Wed, 5 Jun 91 12:39:27 EDT
Re: SMTP Protocol Document... Draft 2, Craig_Everhart, Wed, 5 Jun 91 10:34:36 EDT
Re: SMTP Protocol Document... Draft 2, Philippe-Andre Prindeville, Tue, 4 Jun 91 17:50:30 EDT
Re: SMTP/822 meeting June 21st., Philippe-Andre Prindeville, Tue, 4 Jun 91 16:52:12 EDT
Re: Eight bit SMTP and translations, Keith Moore, Mon, 3 Jun 91 19:10:24 EDT
June 21st meeting, Greg Vaudreuil, Mon, 3 Jun 91 12:28:09 EDT
Re: Eight bit SMTP and translations, Craig_Everhart, Mon, 3 Jun 91 10:11:29 EDT
Re: Eight bit SMTP and translations, Bob, Mon, 3 Jun 91 08:54:40 EDT
Re: Eight bit SMTP and translations, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Mon, 3 Jun 91 04:09:10 EDT
Re: Comments on 8 bit transport implementation., Neil Rickert, Sat, 1 Jun 91 00:57:18 EDT
Comments on 8 bit transport implementation., Neil Rickert, Fri, 31 May 91 13:24:46 EDT
8 bit routing., Neil Rickert, Fri, 31 May 91 12:41:06 EDT
8 bit SMTP and conversion., Neil Rickert, Fri, 31 May 91 12:32:28 EDT
PLEASE READ: 8-bit smtp and mail lists, Greg Vaudreuil, Fri, 31 May 91 11:25:23 EDT
Re: 8-bit smtp and mail lists, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Fri, 31 May 91 11:07:44 EDT
Re: 8-bit smtp and mail lists, Nathaniel Borenstein, Fri, 31 May 91 09:25:28 EDT
the format of notifications, Bob, Fri, 31 May 91 07:18:57 EDT
Re: Eight bit SMTP and translations, Keith Moore, Fri, 31 May 91 03:34:38 EDT
Re: 8-bit smtp and mail lists, Erik M. van der Poel, Fri, 31 May 91 00:10:23 EDT
8-bit smtp and mail lists, K.P.Donnelly, Thu, 30 May 91 21:09:45 EDT
Re: Guaranteed 8-bit path to conversion machine?, David Herron, Thu, 30 May 91 18:43:35 EDT
Guaranteed 8-bit path to conversion machine?, avi, Thu, 30 May 91 17:31:41 EDT
Re: Eight bit SMTP and translations, Neil Katin, Thu, 30 May 91 12:05:48 EDT
Re: returning msg to sender's UA for conversion, Greg Vaudreuil, Thu, 30 May 91 09:57:38 EDT
Re: Multi-octet SMTP support, Erik M. van der Poel, Thu, 30 May 91 00:47:04 EDT
returning msg to sender's UA for conversion, Keith Moore, Thu, 30 May 91 00:10:40 EDT
Re: Eight bit SMTP and translations, Erik M. van der Poel, Wed, 29 May 91 21:55:57 EDT
Re: Multi-octet SMTP support, Keith Moore, Wed, 29 May 91 14:24:19 EDT
Re: Eight bit SMTP and translations, Greg Vaudreuil, Wed, 29 May 91 14:03:22 EDT
Re: Eight bit SMTP and translations, Neil Katin, Wed, 29 May 91 13:08:54 EDT
Re: Eight bit SMTP and translations, Craig_Everhart, Wed, 29 May 91 10:43:08 EDT
Re: Port vs Syntax, Einar Stefferud, Wed, 29 May 91 10:19:14 EDT
Multi-octet SMTP support, rja7m, Wed, 29 May 91 09:10:00 EDT
[no subject], Robert.L.Sargent@stc06.ctd.ornl.gov, 615-481-2168, Wed, 29 May 91 07:10:51 EDT
Re: Eight bit SMTP and translations, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Wed, 29 May 91 06:07:57 EDT
Re: Port vs Syntax, Andr'e PIRARD, Wed, 29 May 91 05:49:28 EDT
Re: Eight bit SMTP and translations, Einar Stefferud, Wed, 29 May 91 03:20:52 EDT
Re: Eight bit SMTP and translations, Erik M. van der Poel, Tue, 28 May 91 22:53:51 EDT
Re: Eight bit SMTP and translations, Erik M. van der Poel, Tue, 28 May 91 22:37:43 EDT
Re: Eight bit SMTP and translations, Erik M. van der Poel, Tue, 28 May 91 22:24:28 EDT
Re: the De-facto 8 bit SMTP RFC draft, Mark Crispin, Tue, 28 May 91 21:16:17 EDT
Re: Architecture Document... Draft 1, Mark Crispin, Tue, 28 May 91 19:32:46 EDT
Re: Eight bit SMTP and translations, rja7m, Tue, 28 May 91 18:44:55 EDT
Re: Eight bit SMTP and translations, John M. Wobus, Tue, 28 May 91 16:58:10 EDT
Re: Eight bit SMTP and translations, Craig_Everhart, Tue, 28 May 91 14:19:28 EDT
Re: Port vs Syntax, Craig_Everhart, Tue, 28 May 91 14:19:20 EDT
Re: Eight bit SMTP and translations, Einar Stefferud, Tue, 28 May 91 14:07:54 EDT
Re: Eight bit SMTP and translations, Bob Smart, Tue, 28 May 91 00:05:01 EDT
Re: Eight bit SMTP and translations, Erik M. van der Poel, Mon, 27 May 91 23:08:42 EDT
Re: Eight bit SMTP and translations, Einar Stefferud, Mon, 27 May 91 19:15:27 EDT
Re: SVr4 mail and RFC-XXXX, Nathaniel Borenstein, Mon, 27 May 91 16:18:35 EDT
Re: Port vs Syntax, Einar Stefferud, Mon, 27 May 91 13:15:54 EDT
Eight bit SMTP and translations, John C Klensin, Mon, 27 May 91 11:30:56 EDT
Port vs Syntax, Andr'e PIRARD, Mon, 27 May 91 09:46:59 EDT
SVr4 mail and RFC-XXXX, t.l.hansen, Mon, 27 May 91 00:21:07 EDT
Re: Architecture Document... Draft 1, Bob, Sun, 26 May 91 19:44:02 EDT
Re: the De-facto 8 bit SMTP RFC draft, Ed Greshko, Sun, 26 May 91 14:00:11 EDT
Re: Architecture Document... Draft 1, Bob, Sun, 26 May 91 08:21:36 EDT
Re: the De-facto 8 bit SMTP RFC draft, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Sun, 26 May 91 06:38:31 EDT
Re: the De-facto 8 bit SMTP RFC draft, Einar Stefferud, Sat, 25 May 91 22:16:12 EDT
Re: SMTP Protocol Document... Draft 2, Einar Stefferud, Sat, 25 May 91 22:15:31 EDT
Re: Architecture Document... Draft 1, Einar Stefferud, Sat, 25 May 91 22:14:58 EDT
Re: the De-facto 8 bit SMTP RFC draft, Nathaniel Borenstein, Sat, 25 May 91 09:48:04 EDT
Re: the De-facto 8 bit SMTP RFC draft, John C Klensin, Fri, 24 May 91 22:44:23 EDT
re: the De-facto 8 bit SMTP RFC draft, Mark Crispin, Fri, 24 May 91 18:17:51 EDT
the De-facto 8 bit SMTP RFC draft, Robert Ullmann, Fri, 24 May 91 17:14:08 EDT
SMTP Protocol Document... Draft 2, Greg Vaudreuil, Thu, 23 May 91 15:34:57 EDT
Architecture Document... Draft 1, Greg Vaudreuil, Thu, 23 May 91 15:34:21 EDT
8 bit SMTP documents, Greg Vaudreuil, Thu, 23 May 91 15:34:14 EDT
Re: Re: 822/SMTP Meeting: Character Set Concerns, John C Klensin, Wed, 22 May 91 12:00:25 EDT
Re: 822/SMTP Meeting: Character Set Concerns, t.l.hansen, Wed, 22 May 91 10:41:31 EDT
Re: 822/SMTP Meeting: Character Set Concerns, rja7m, Wed, 22 May 91 09:52:37 EDT
Re: 822/SMTP Meeting: Character Set Concerns, Erik M. van der Poel, Wed, 22 May 91 06:27:08 EDT
Re: SMTP/822 meeting June 21st., Andr'e PIRARD, Wed, 22 May 91 04:58:29 EDT
822/SMTP Meeting: Character Set Concerns, rja7m, Tue, 21 May 91 16:01:12 EDT
Re: SMTP/822 meeting June 21st., Greg Vaudreuil, Tue, 21 May 91 13:17:01 EDT
Their own opinion :-), Andr'e PIRARD, Tue, 21 May 91 12:39:02 EDT
Re: SMTP/822 meeting June 21st., Einar Stefferud, Tue, 21 May 91 12:36:04 EDT
SMTP/822 meeting June 21st., Greg Vaudreuil, Tue, 21 May 91 08:33:08 EDT
Re: lines, SMTP, ..., Craig_Everhart, Mon, 13 May 91 10:43:54 EDT
Re: lines, SMTP, ..., Neil Rickert, Fri, 10 May 91 22:23:59 EDT
Re: lines, SMTP, ..., isaac, Fri, 10 May 91 17:29:20 EDT
Re: lines, SMTP, ..., David_Thompson%GN%7cg, Fri, 10 May 91 17:13:24 EDT
On encodings : random thoughts...., David Robinson, Fri, 10 May 91 12:37:52 EDT
Re: lines, SMTP, ..., jwn2, Fri, 10 May 91 11:33:08 EDT
Re: lines, SMTP, ..., Nathaniel Borenstein, Fri, 10 May 91 09:36:39 EDT
Re: lines, SMTP, ..., Einar Stefferud, Fri, 10 May 91 02:19:12 EDT
Re: lines, SMTP, ..., David_Thompson%GN%7cg, Tue, 7 May 91 10:05:45 EDT
Return Receipts -- POINT OF ORDER, The TallyMan, Thu, 2 May 91 09:48:26 EDT
Conversion and character set proposals worry me, Bob, Wed, 1 May 91 20:49:46 EDT
POINT OF ORDER AGAIN! (Re: Please: a solution to help the most people), Einar Stefferud, Wed, 1 May 91 19:06:14 EDT
Re: return receipts, Neil Rickert, Wed, 1 May 91 17:18:13 EDT
return receipts, tep, Wed, 1 May 91 16:24:32 EDT
return receipts, Mark Crispin, Wed, 1 May 91 14:27:58 EDT
Re: Please: a solution to help the most people, MMDF Mail Administrator, Wed, 1 May 91 13:02:04 EDT
re: Please don't dump version numbers., David Robinson, Wed, 1 May 91 10:42:20 EDT
NETF and EUNet decisions / draft 8-bit transport RFC, John C Klensin, Tue, 30 Apr 91 21:14:54 EDT
Re: Please: a solution to help the most people, Tim Kehres, Tue, 30 Apr 91 18:42:17 EDT
Re: 8 bit SMTP transport, draft RFC, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Tue, 30 Apr 91 16:49:32 EDT
8 bit SMTP transport, draft RFC, John C Klensin, Tue, 30 Apr 91 09:05:19 EDT
[no subject], Admin, Sat, 27 Apr 91 17:43:56 EDT
Re: What's the 'part' in 'multipart'?, Peter Vanderbilt, Sat, 27 Apr 91 17:19:11 EDT
Re: What's the 'part' in 'multipart'?, Einar Stefferud, Sat, 27 Apr 91 17:05:49 EDT
Re: What's the 'part' in 'multipart'?, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Sat, 27 Apr 91 06:29:43 EDT
Re: A new port should not use smtp, it should use RPC, Keith Moore, Fri, 26 Apr 91 23:22:45 EDT
Re: A new port should not use smtp, it should use RPC, Einar Stefferud, Fri, 26 Apr 91 14:16:28 EDT
Re: user@unqualified, Neil Rickert, N Illinois U, CS, Fri, 26 Apr 91 11:55:43 EDT
Re: A new port should not use smtp, it should use RPC, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Fri, 26 Apr 91 06:15:34 EDT
Re: When is extra directory information needed., Bob, Thu, 25 Apr 91 22:45:51 EDT
Re: user@unqualified, John C Klensin, Thu, 25 Apr 91 22:45:32 EDT
user@unqualified, Harold A. Miller, Thu, 25 Apr 91 21:26:12 EDT
Re: A new port should not use smtp, it should use RPC, Ittai Hershman, Thu, 25 Apr 91 19:18:02 EDT
INTERIM WORKING GROUP MEETINGS, Greg Vaudreuil, Thu, 25 Apr 91 18:26:34 EDT
Re: A new port should not use smtp, it should use RPC, Keith Moore, Thu, 25 Apr 91 17:33:30 EDT
Re: A new port should not use smtp, it should use RPC, bob, Thu, 25 Apr 91 16:36:01 EDT
Re: When is extra directory information needed., Einar Stefferud, Thu, 25 Apr 91 05:09:08 EDT
A new port should not use smtp, it should use RPC, Dan Oscarsson, Thu, 25 Apr 91 04:39:17 EDT
Re: When is extra directory information needed., Neil Rickert, Thu, 25 Apr 91 00:24:41 EDT
Re: When is extra directory information needed., Bob, Wed, 24 Apr 91 23:10:15 EDT
Re: When is extra directory information needed., Einar Stefferud, Wed, 24 Apr 91 22:59:08 EDT
Re: When is extra directory information needed., Eliot, Wed, 24 Apr 91 18:11:12 EDT
Re: When is extra directory information needed., Neil Rickert, N Illinois U, CS, Wed, 24 Apr 91 13:47:55 EDT
Re: When is extra directory information needed., John C Klensin, Wed, 24 Apr 91 13:19:20 EDT
Re: When is extra directory information needed., Neil Rickert, Wed, 24 Apr 91 09:52:11 EDT
When is extra directory information needed., Bob, Wed, 24 Apr 91 03:17:31 EDT
WHOOPS! Re: question about the new port, Einar Stefferud, Wed, 24 Apr 91 01:59:20 EDT
7-bit codes, Erik M. van der Poel, Wed, 24 Apr 91 01:35:33 EDT
Re: question about the new port, leo j mclaughlin iii, Tue, 23 Apr 91 19:09:52 EDT
Re: question about the new port, John C Klensin, Tue, 23 Apr 91 12:57:14 EDT
Re: question about the new port, jwn2, Tue, 23 Apr 91 12:09:34 EDT
Re: What one can tell from an unreachable connection, Steve Huston (PSI Products Group, x3099), Tue, 23 Apr 91 08:15:30 EDT
Re: question about the new port, Einar Stefferud, Tue, 23 Apr 91 01:35:44 EDT
Re: question about the new port, Einar Stefferud, Tue, 23 Apr 91 00:39:28 EDT
Video Conf idea Re: POINT OF ORDER, Einar Stefferud, Tue, 23 Apr 91 00:39:16 EDT
Re: question about the new port, Erik M. van der Poel, Mon, 22 Apr 91 21:43:47 EDT
Re: question about the new port, Eliot, Mon, 22 Apr 91 21:07:17 EDT
Re: question about the new port, John C Klensin, Mon, 22 Apr 91 19:12:09 EDT
Re: question about the new port, Neil Katin, Mon, 22 Apr 91 18:04:07 EDT
Re: What one can tell from an unreachable connection, John C Klensin, Mon, 22 Apr 91 16:58:40 EDT
Re: question about the new port, Einar Stefferud, Mon, 22 Apr 91 16:48:21 EDT
Re: POINT OF ORDER, Einar Stefferud, Mon, 22 Apr 91 16:20:39 EDT
Re: POINT OF ORDER, Phill Gross, Mon, 22 Apr 91 14:54:32 EDT
What one can tell from an unreachable connection, David Herron, Mon, 22 Apr 91 14:49:24 EDT
Re: Strawman proposal, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Mon, 22 Apr 91 14:20:20 EDT
Re: question about the new port, David Herron, Mon, 22 Apr 91 13:14:28 EDT
Re: question about the new port, David Herron, Mon, 22 Apr 91 10:06:14 -0700
Re: New port not needed!! And other matters., Keld J|rn Simonsen, Mon, 22 Apr 91 11:56:28 EDT
Re: Strawman proposal, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Mon, 22 Apr 91 11:13:50 EDT
Re: Strawman proposal, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Mon, 22 Apr 91 11:08:53 EDT
POINT OF ORDER, Greg Vaudreuil, Mon, 22 Apr 91 10:28:18 EDT
Re: Strawman proposal, Nathaniel Borenstein, Mon, 22 Apr 91 10:09:03 EDT
Re: Strawman proposal, Neil Rickert, Mon, 22 Apr 91 09:47:22 EDT
Re: New port not needed!! And other matters., Ned Freed, Postmaster, Mon, 22 Apr 91 05:47:15 EDT
Re: question about the new port, Erik M. van der Poel, Mon, 22 Apr 91 03:51:43 EDT
POINT OF ORDER: Re: Strawman proposal, Einar Stefferud, Mon, 22 Apr 91 03:26:28 EDT
Re: Strawman proposal, moore, Mon, 22 Apr 91 03:24:33 EDT
Re: Strawman proposal, Erik M. van der Poel, Mon, 22 Apr 91 02:30:49 EDT
Re: Strawman proposal, Valdis Kletnieks, Mon, 22 Apr 91 02:15:23 EDT
Re: question about the new port, Einar Stefferud, Mon, 22 Apr 91 01:16:43 EDT
Re: Strawman proposal, Erik M. van der Poel, Mon, 22 Apr 91 00:57:22 EDT
Re: Strawman proposal, Bob, Mon, 22 Apr 91 00:53:38 EDT
Re: Strawman proposal, Erik M. van der Poel, Mon, 22 Apr 91 00:38:54 EDT
Re: Strawman proposal, moore, Mon, 22 Apr 91 00:34:14 EDT
Re: question about the new port, Erik M. van der Poel, Mon, 22 Apr 91 00:12:14 EDT
Re: Strawman proposal, moore, Sun, 21 Apr 91 23:37:11 EDT
Re: Strawman proposal, Erik M. van der Poel, Sun, 21 Apr 91 23:02:16 EDT
Re: question about the new port, Eliot, Sun, 21 Apr 91 22:28:59 EDT
Re: Strawman proposal, Erik M. van der Poel, Sun, 21 Apr 91 21:39:34 EDT
Re: question about the new port, Bob, Sun, 21 Apr 91 19:14:39 EDT
Re: question about the new port, Risto Kankkunen, Sun, 21 Apr 91 19:02:17 EDT
Re: question about the new port, Mark Crispin, Sun, 21 Apr 91 17:41:43 EDT
re: New port not needed!! And other matters., Mark Crispin, Sun, 21 Apr 91 17:34:01 EDT
Re: question about the new port, Risto Kankkunen, Sun, 21 Apr 91 13:16:58 EDT
Strawman proposal, Bob, Sun, 21 Apr 91 05:19:19 EDT
New port not needed!! And other matters., Bob, Sun, 21 Apr 91 05:05:27 EDT
Re: smtp charter (revised), Erik M. van der Poel, Sun, 21 Apr 91 03:52:26 EDT
a model?, bob, Sat, 20 Apr 91 09:19:48 EDT
Re: smtp charter (revised), Einar Stefferud, Sat, 20 Apr 91 07:55:43 EDT
Re: question about the new port, Einar Stefferud, Sat, 20 Apr 91 07:55:30 EDT
On Firing Your Secretary (was Re: Please: a solution to help the most people ), Einar Stefferud, Sat, 20 Apr 91 07:16:37 EDT
Re: smtp charter (revised), Erik M. van der Poel, Sat, 20 Apr 91 04:19:57 EDT
Re: RFC-87gtwys (was: smtp charter (revised) ), Erik M. van der Poel, Sat, 20 Apr 91 02:56:37 EDT
Re: Please: a solution to help the most people, Neil Rickert, Fri, 19 Apr 91 23:38:18 EDT
Re: question about the new port, Mark Crispin, Fri, 19 Apr 91 23:18:32 EDT
Re: question about the new port, Bob, Fri, 19 Apr 91 22:53:21 EDT
question about the new port, Mark Crispin, Fri, 19 Apr 91 21:37:38 EDT
Please: a solution to help the most people, Bob, Fri, 19 Apr 91 19:08:47 EDT
Re: Amuricans and the eighth bit, hlam, Fri, 19 Apr 91 18:02:24 EDT
Re: RFC-87gtwys (was: smtp charter (revised) ), Dean D. Throop, Fri, 19 Apr 91 17:46:09 EDT
Re: smtp charter (revised), Andr'e PIRARD, Fri, 19 Apr 91 17:31:52 EDT
Re: smtp charter (revised), Einar Stefferud, Fri, 19 Apr 91 16:35:51 EDT
Re: RFC-87gtwys (was: smtp charter (revised) ), John C Klensin, Fri, 19 Apr 91 15:04:43 EDT
Re: smtp charter (revised), Mark Crispin, Fri, 19 Apr 91 15:00:35 EDT
DATA and CRLF.CRLF (was: smtp charter (revised) ), tep, Fri, 19 Apr 91 14:51:17 EDT
Re: RFC-87gtwys (was: smtp charter (revised) ), David Herron, Fri, 19 Apr 91 13:41:52 EDT
Re: smtp charter (revised), Keld J|rn Simonsen, Fri, 19 Apr 91 13:09:26 EDT
Re: smtp charter (revised), Paul A Vixie, Fri, 19 Apr 91 12:34:48 EDT
Re: smtp charter (revised), John C Klensin, Fri, 19 Apr 91 12:22:49 EDT
Re: smtp charter (revised), Risto Kankkunen, Fri, 19 Apr 91 11:54:31 EDT
Re: smtp charter (revised), David Herron, Fri, 19 Apr 91 10:45:36 EDT
Re: smtp charter (revised), Nathaniel Borenstein, Fri, 19 Apr 91 10:15:42 EDT
Re: RFC-87gtwys (was: smtp charter (revised) ), Dean D. Throop, Fri, 19 Apr 91 09:55:04 EDT
Re: smtp charter (revised), Ittai Hershman, Fri, 19 Apr 91 09:47:02 EDT
Re: IETF SMTP group is heading in the right direction. From: Bob <smart@mel.dit.csiro.au> Content-Length: 4249 X-Lines: 91 If you have an 8 bit message you will have to send it to 7 bit MTAs sometimes., Glenn Wright - Sun EHQ - Mktg, Fri, 19 Apr 91 09:42:07 EDT
IETF SMTP group is heading in the right direction., Bob, Fri, 19 Apr 91 08:19:58 EDT
Re: smtp charter (revised), Einar Stefferud, Fri, 19 Apr 91 05:16:18 EDT
Re: smtp charter (revised), Paul A Vixie, Fri, 19 Apr 91 03:29:32 EDT
Re: smtp charter (revised), Ned Freed, Postmaster, Thu, 18 Apr 91 21:00:32 EDT
New mail transport protocols, John C Klensin, Thu, 18 Apr 91 20:07:04 EDT
Re: smtp charter (revised), Mark Crispin, Thu, 18 Apr 91 18:43:12 EDT
Re: smtp charter (revised), Ned Freed, Postmaster, Thu, 18 Apr 91 18:36:15 EDT
Re: smtp charter (revised), Einar Stefferud, Thu, 18 Apr 91 16:37:00 EDT
Re: smtp charter (reviesd), Keld J|rn Simonsen, Thu, 18 Apr 91 16:14:00 EDT
Re: smtp charter (revised), John C Klensin, Thu, 18 Apr 91 15:19:21 EDT
Re: smtp charter (revised), Einar Stefferud, Thu, 18 Apr 91 13:57:51 EDT
Re: smtp charter (revised), Ittai Hershman, Thu, 18 Apr 91 12:23:37 EDT
Re: smtp charter (revised), John C Klensin, Thu, 18 Apr 91 11:41:38 EDT
Re: smtp charter (revised), Dave Crocker, Thu, 18 Apr 91 11:37:02 EDT
Re: smtp charter (revised), Ittai Hershman, Thu, 18 Apr 91 11:20:05 EDT
Re: smtp charter (revised), John C Klensin, Thu, 18 Apr 91 07:34:10 EDT
Re: smtp charter (revised), Einar Stefferud, Wed, 17 Apr 91 19:55:45 EDT
Re: FYI: a message handling system is available, Shannon Yeh, Sun, 14 Apr 91 18:18:13 EDT
Re: FYI: a message handling system is available, Dave Crocker, Sun, 14 Apr 91 16:28:36 EDT
Re: smtp charter (reviesd), Mark Crispin, Sun, 14 Apr 91 02:09:59 EDT
Re: FYI: a message ..., Shannon Yeh, Sat, 13 Apr 91 16:11:21 EDT
FYI: a message handling system is available, Shannon Yeh, Sat, 13 Apr 91 02:03:53 EDT
Re: smtp charter (reviesd), Ittai Hershman, Fri, 12 Apr 91 20:53:13 EDT
Re: smtp charter (reviesd), Neil Katin, Fri, 12 Apr 91 19:35:51 EDT
Re: smtp charter (reviesd), leo j mclaughlin iii, Fri, 12 Apr 91 17:52:45 EDT
Re: smtp charter (revised), leo j mclaughlin iii, Fri, 12 Apr 91 17:50:10 EDT
Re: smtp charter (reviesd), John C Klensin, Fri, 12 Apr 91 05:35:55 EDT
Re: smtp charter (reviesd), Einar Stefferud, Fri, 12 Apr 91 03:27:23 EDT
Re: smtp charter (reviesd), Dean D. Throop, Thu, 11 Apr 91 14:10:51 EDT
Re: ietf-smtp charter, John C Klensin, Thu, 11 Apr 91 11:28:51 EDT
smtp charter (reviesd), Greg Vaudreuil, Thu, 11 Apr 91 09:42:04 EDT
ietf-smtp charter, Greg Vaudreuil, Thu, 11 Apr 91 09:41:53 EDT
Proposed charter for the SMTP sub-group, Greg Vaudreuil, Thu, 11 Apr 91 09:41:24 EDT
Re: Why We Disagree So Much... A Thought, Greg Vaudreuil, Thu, 11 Apr 91 09:35:34 EDT
Re: Why We Disagree So Much... A Thought, Nathaniel Borenstein, Thu, 11 Apr 91 09:10:31 EDT
Re: Why We Disagree So Much... A Thought, Mark Crispin, Thu, 11 Apr 91 03:32:01 EDT
Re: Why We Disagree So Much... A Thought, Einar Stefferud, Thu, 11 Apr 91 01:32:57 EDT
Why We Disagree So Much... A Thought, David Robinson, Wed, 10 Apr 91 22:21:38 EDT
Re: universal character sets, Erik M. van der Poel, Wed, 10 Apr 91 03:01:15 EDT
Re: Compression, and nested encodings, Anders.Klemets, Tue, 9 Apr 91 18:09:49 EDT
Re: Swahili, Rick_McGowan, Tue, 9 Apr 91 13:32:58 EDT
Re: universal character sets, Nathaniel Borenstein, Tue, 9 Apr 91 10:25:28 EDT
Re: universal character sets, Erik M. van der Poel, Tue, 9 Apr 91 02:39:28 EDT
ISO 2022 in SMTP, Erik M. van der Poel, Tue, 9 Apr 91 02:20:11 EDT
Re: Another look at 8 bit transport for local mail, Erik M. van der Poel, Mon, 8 Apr 91 22:50:42 EDT
Swahili, Erik M. van der Poel, Mon, 8 Apr 91 22:13:45 EDT
Re: ISO2022 revisited, and related issues, Erik M. van der Poel, Mon, 8 Apr 91 21:36:17 EDT
Re: ISO2022 revisited, and related issues, Risto Kankkunen, Mon, 8 Apr 91 19:46:20 EDT
Re: Closing connection, Risto Kankkunen, Mon, 8 Apr 91 19:17:05 EDT
Re: Closing connection (was: Re: Another look at 8 bit transport for...), Craig_Everhart, Mon, 8 Apr 91 17:15:58 EDT
Re: Command Batching (was: Closing connection (was: Re: Another look at 8 bit transport for...)), Anders.Klemets, Mon, 8 Apr 91 16:38:44 EDT
universal character sets, Mark Crispin, Mon, 8 Apr 91 16:06:13 EDT
Re: Closing connection (was: Re: Another look at 8 bit transport for...), John C Klensin, Mon, 8 Apr 91 15:00:41 EDT
Closing connection (was: Re: Another look at 8 bit transport for...), Risto Kankkunen, Mon, 8 Apr 91 11:49:50 EDT
Re: Another look at 8 bit transport for local mail, John C Klensin, Mon, 8 Apr 91 11:02:41 EDT
Inline excerpts (was: Re: Another look at 8 bit transport for...), Risto Kankkunen, Mon, 8 Apr 91 10:58:54 EDT
Re: Another look at 8 bit transport for local mail, Nathaniel Borenstein, Mon, 8 Apr 91 09:21:05 EDT
Re: ISO2022 revisited, and related issues, John C Klensin, Mon, 8 Apr 91 07:43:42 EDT
Re: ISO2022 revisited, and related issues, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, Mon, 8 Apr 91 06:32:14 EDT
mail owner-ietf-smtp@dimacs.rutgers.edu, Glenn P. Wright, Mon, 8 Apr 91 05:19:28 EDT
Re: Another look at 8 bit transport for local mail, Erik M. van der Poel, Mon, 8 Apr 91 02:39:49 EDT
Re: Another look at 8 bit transport for local mail, Erik M. van der Poel, Mon, 8 Apr 91 02:10:44 EDT
Re: Another look at 8 bit transport for local mail, Erik M. van der Poel, Mon, 8 Apr 91 00:59:57 EDT
Re: ISO2022 revisited, and related issues, Erik M. van der Poel, Mon, 8 Apr 91 00:37:12 EDT
new 822 list is alive!, David Paul Zimmerman, Sat, 6 Apr 91 14:17:41 EST
Re: Better Headers, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Fri, 5 Apr 91 16:00:45 EST
Re: "prefix" area in multipart message, Nathaniel Borenstein, Fri, 5 Apr 91 14:13:00 EST
Re: "prefix" area in multipart message, Vincent Lau, Fri, 5 Apr 91 14:01:39 EST
Nit-pick 822, Dave Crocker, Fri, 5 Apr 91 13:50:52 EST
Re: ietf-822-request, Greg Vaudreuil, Fri, 5 Apr 91 13:39:55 EST
Re: "prefix" area in multipart message, John C Klensin, Fri, 5 Apr 91 13:32:57 EST
Re: "prefix" area in multipart message, Dave Crocker, Fri, 5 Apr 91 13:06:11 EST
ISO2022 revisited, and related issues, John C Klensin, Fri, 5 Apr 91 12:37:53 EST
Re: "prefix" area in multipart message, Craig_Everhart, Fri, 5 Apr 91 12:23:37 EST
Re: How much does an MTA know?, Craig_Everhart, Fri, 5 Apr 91 12:04:42 EST
ietf-822-request, Mark H. Needleman, Fri, 5 Apr 91 12:00:52 EST
Re: Better Headers, Craig_Everhart, Fri, 5 Apr 91 11:25:39 EST
Re: Another look at 8 bit transport for local mail, Nathaniel Borenstein, Fri, 5 Apr 91 09:44:03 EST
Spitting the Mailing list., Greg Vaudreuil, Fri, 5 Apr 91 09:42:08 EST
Re: "prefix" area in multipart message, Nathaniel Borenstein, Fri, 5 Apr 91 09:36:20 EST
Re: Better Headers, Nathaniel Borenstein, Fri, 5 Apr 91 09:32:57 EST
Re: Another look at 8 bit transport for local mail, Risto Kankkunen, Fri, 5 Apr 91 08:43:52 EST
Re: "prefix" area in multipart message, Einar Stefferud, Fri, 5 Apr 91 06:10:48 EST
Separating the 821 and 822 work, Steve Kille, Fri, 5 Apr 91 05:01:01 EST
Re: "prefix" area in multipart message, Vincent Lau, Fri, 5 Apr 91 04:15:48 EST
Re: How much does an MTA know?, John C Klensin, Thu, 4 Apr 91 23:54:47 EST
Re: Another look at 8 bit transport for local mail, Erik M. van der Poel, Thu, 4 Apr 91 22:04:46 EST
How much does an MTA know?, Michael Stein, Thu, 4 Apr 91 20:53:19 EST
Re: Better Headers, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Thu, 4 Apr 91 17:15:04 EST
Re: Another look at 8 bit transport for local mail, Craig_Everhart, Thu, 4 Apr 91 15:15:46 EST
Re: Another look at 8 bit transport for local mail, Nathaniel Borenstein, Thu, 4 Apr 91 14:22:50 EST
Re: "prefix" area in multipart message, Nathaniel Borenstein, Thu, 4 Apr 91 12:58:25 EST
Re: 5 ideas for the next draft, Nathaniel Borenstein, Thu, 4 Apr 91 12:56:56 EST
Re: Another look at 8 bit transport for local mail, Craig_Everhart, Thu, 4 Apr 91 12:38:50 EST
Re: Another look at 8 bit transport for local mail, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Thu, 4 Apr 91 12:33:37 EST
Re: Another look at 8 bit transport for local mail, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Thu, 4 Apr 91 12:06:43 EST
Re: Is it reasonable?, Risto Kankkunen, Thu, 4 Apr 91 10:38:47 EST
Re: "prefix" area in multipart message, Nathaniel Borenstein, Thu, 4 Apr 91 10:26:40 EST
Some thoughts on 8-bit text SMTP, Risto Kankkunen, Thu, 4 Apr 91 10:07:38 EST
Conclusions from NETF, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, Thu, 4 Apr 91 09:16:16 EST
Re: 5 ideas for the next draft, Risto Kankkunen, Thu, 4 Apr 91 06:57:19 EST
Re: Another look at 8 bit transport for local mail, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Thu, 4 Apr 91 06:48:48 EST
Re: "prefix" area in multipart message, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, Thu, 4 Apr 91 04:20:38 EST
Re: "prefix" area in multipart message, Greg Vaudreuil, Thu, 4 Apr 91 02:53:44 EST
Re: Another look at 8 bit transport for local mail, John C Klensin, Wed, 3 Apr 91 23:53:37 EST
Re: "prefix" area in multipart message, Vincent Lau, Wed, 3 Apr 91 23:26:48 EST
Re: Another look at 8 bit transport for local mail, Erik M. van der Poel, Wed, 3 Apr 91 21:19:37 EST
Re: "prefix" area in multipart message, Nathaniel Borenstein, Wed, 3 Apr 91 20:56:26 EST
Re: Amuricans and the eighth bit, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Wed, 3 Apr 91 19:21:39 EST
Re: "prefix" area in multipart message, Vincent Lau, Wed, 3 Apr 91 16:41:39 EST
Re: Another look at 8 bit transport for local mail, Nathaniel Borenstein, Wed, 3 Apr 91 16:23:05 EST
[K.P.Donnelly@edinburgh.ac.uk: 8 bits], David Paul Zimmerman, Wed, 3 Apr 91 16:16:32 EST
Re: "prefix" area in multipart message, Einar Stefferud, Wed, 3 Apr 91 16:07:34 EST
Re: "prefix" area in multipart message, Nathaniel Borenstein, Wed, 3 Apr 91 15:39:46 EST
Another look at 8 bit transport for local mail, John C Klensin, Wed, 3 Apr 91 14:20:43 EST
Re: "prefix" area in multipart message, Nathaniel Borenstein, Wed, 3 Apr 91 09:15:13 EST
Re: Is it reasonable?, Einar Stefferud, Wed, 3 Apr 91 06:06:48 EST
Re: "prefix" area in multipart message, Timo Lehtinen, Wed, 3 Apr 91 03:37:47 EST
Re: Is it reasonable?, Dave Crocker, Tue, 2 Apr 91 19:46:40 EST
"prefix" area in multipart message, Vincent Lau, Tue, 2 Apr 91 19:13:00 EST
Re: Is it reasonable?, Anders.Klemets, Tue, 2 Apr 91 13:04:17 EST
Re: 5 ideas for the next draft, Craig_Everhart, Tue, 2 Apr 91 11:52:22 EST
Better Headers, Nathaniel Borenstein, Tue, 2 Apr 91 10:27:11 EST
Re: Is it reasonable?, Risto Kankkunen, Tue, 2 Apr 91 09:16:13 EST
8-Bit No, BInary Maybe (Was: Re: Is it reasonable?), Nathaniel Borenstein, Tue, 2 Apr 91 09:14:11 EST
Re: Is it reasonable?, Risto Kankkunen, Tue, 2 Apr 91 08:59:58 EST
Re: Is it reasonable?, Risto Kankkunen, Tue, 2 Apr 91 08:59:41 EST
Re: Is it reasonable?, Mark Crispin, Tue, 2 Apr 91 01:15:11 EST
Re: Is it reasonable?, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Mon, 1 Apr 91 23:49:05 EST
Re: Suggested Requirements for Multi-part Multi-Structured 822 Encoding, Vincent Lau, Mon, 1 Apr 91 23:46:03 EST
Re: Is it reasonable?, Dave Crocker, Mon, 1 Apr 91 19:54:27 EST
Re: Suggested Requirements for Multi-part Multi-Structured 822 Encoding, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Mon, 1 Apr 91 18:44:19 EST
5 ideas for the next draft, Nathaniel Borenstein, Mon, 1 Apr 91 15:14:46 EST
Re: Is it reasonable?, Greg Vaudreuil, Mon, 1 Apr 91 09:46:50 EST
Re: Suggested Requirements for Multi-part Multi-Structured 822 Encoding, Steve Kille, Mon, 1 Apr 91 07:03:51 EST
Re: Suggested Requirements for Multi-part Multi-Structured 822 Encoding, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Mon, 1 Apr 91 06:34:22 EST
Re: Suggested Requirements for Multi-part Multi-Structured 822 Encoding, Steve Kille, Mon, 1 Apr 91 06:04:57 EST
Re: Is it reasonable?, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Mon, 1 Apr 91 01:04:22 EST
Re: Suggested Requirements for Multi-part Multi-Structured 822 Encoding, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Mon, 1 Apr 91 00:49:01 EST
Re: Suggested Requirements for Multi-part Multi-Structured 822 Encoding, Mark Crispin, Sun, 31 Mar 91 22:39:50 EST
Re: Suggested Requirements for Multi-part Multi-Structured 822 Encoding, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Sun, 31 Mar 91 14:20:39 EST
Re: Lastest drfat of RFC-XXXX, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Sat, 30 Mar 91 11:40:38 EST
Re: Lastest drfat of RFC-XXXX, Einar Stefferud, Fri, 29 Mar 91 22:05:12 EST
Re: Lastest drfat of RFC-XXXX, Risto Kankkunen, Fri, 29 Mar 91 18:40:19 EST
Re: Lastest drfat of RFC-XXXX, Risto Kankkunen, Wed, 27 Mar 91 07:15:20 EST
Re: Lastest drfat of RFC-XXXX, Risto Kankkunen, Wed, 27 Mar 91 07:02:40 EST
Re: Lastest drfat of RFC-XXXX, Einar Stefferud, Tue, 26 Mar 91 19:54:50 EST
Re: Proposal for how to divide multipart messages, Dave Crocker, Tue, 26 Mar 91 17:37:49 EST
Re: Suggested Requirements for Multi-part Multi-Structured 822 Encoding, Dave Crocker, Tue, 26 Mar 91 17:35:57 EST
Re: Lastest drfat of RFC-XXXX, Greg Vaudreuil, Tue, 26 Mar 91 17:20:33 EST
Proposal for how to divide multipart messages, Greg Vaudreuil, Tue, 26 Mar 91 09:08:46 EST
Re: Lastest drfat of RFC-XXXX, Einar Stefferud, Tue, 26 Mar 91 06:49:16 EST
Alvestrand on Dashes, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, Tue, 26 Mar 91 05:10:56 EST
Suggested Requirements for Multi-part Multi-Structured 822 Encoding, David Robinson, Mon, 25 Mar 91 22:40:53 EST
Re: CDC Multimedia/Multipart extensions, David Robinson, Mon, 25 Mar 91 22:40:12 EST
Re: Is it reasonable?, Andr'e PIRARD, Mon, 25 Mar 91 10:53:18 EST
RE: Lastest drfat of RFC-XXXX, Risto Kankkunen, Mon, 25 Mar 91 09:36:17 EST
Re: Lastest drfat of RFC-XXXX, Risto Kankkunen, Mon, 25 Mar 91 09:24:12 EST
Multimedia/Multipart extensions to RFC987, David Herron, Mon, 25 Mar 91 00:23:23 EST
Re: Minutes of the SMTP meeting in St. Louis, Risto Kankkunen, Sat, 23 Mar 91 12:58:37 EST
Re: Minutes of the SMTP meeting in St. Louis, Risto Kankkunen, Sat, 23 Mar 91 12:47:00 EST
Re: Minutes of the SMTP meeting in St. Louis, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Sat, 23 Mar 91 12:34:12 EST
Re: Lastest drfat of RFC-XXXX, Risto Kankkunen, Sat, 23 Mar 91 11:36:19 EST
Re: Lastest drfat of RFC-XXXX, Risto Kankkunen, Sat, 23 Mar 91 11:29:47 EST
Re: Is it reasonable?, Risto Kankkunen, Sat, 23 Mar 91 11:22:15 EST
Re: Minutes of the SMTP meeting in St. Louis, Risto Kankkunen, Sat, 23 Mar 91 11:05:47 EST
Re: Minutes of the SMTP meeting in St. Louis, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Sat, 23 Mar 91 07:04:42 EST
Re: RFC-XXXX Boundary Marking, Vincent Lau, Fri, 22 Mar 91 17:12:46 EST
Re: Minutes of the SMTP meeting in St. Louis, Dave Crocker, Fri, 22 Mar 91 16:15:46 EST
Re: Minutes of the SMTP meeting in St. Louis, Dave Crocker, Fri, 22 Mar 91 16:13:06 EST
Re: Lastest drfat of RFC-XXXX, Dean D. Throop, Fri, 22 Mar 91 14:11:28 EST
Re: Lastest drfat of RFC-XXXX, Dave Crocker, Fri, 22 Mar 91 12:51:21 EST
Re: Is it reasonable?, Nathaniel Borenstein, Fri, 22 Mar 91 11:31:12 EST
Is it reasonable?, Andr'e PIRARD, Fri, 22 Mar 91 10:31:10 EST
Re: RFC-XXXX Boundary Marking, Craig_Everhart, Fri, 22 Mar 91 09:47:34 EST
Re: RFC-XXXX Boundary Marking, Vincent Lau, Thu, 21 Mar 91 18:31:36 EST
Re: RFC-XXXX Boundary Marking, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Thu, 21 Mar 91 16:11:50 EST
Re: RFC-XXXX Boundary Marking, Mark Crispin, Thu, 21 Mar 91 16:07:01 EST
Re: Minutes of the SMTP meeting in St. Louis, Mark Crispin, Thu, 21 Mar 91 16:04:46 EST
Re: Minutes of the SMTP meeting in St. Louis, Nathaniel Borenstein, Thu, 21 Mar 91 11:13:22 EST
Re: RFC-XXXX Boundary Marking, Nathaniel Borenstein, Thu, 21 Mar 91 10:47:11 EST
Re: Minutes of the SMTP meeting in St. Louis, Nathaniel Borenstein, Thu, 21 Mar 91 10:44:17 EST
Re: Lastest drfat of RFC-XXXX, Risto Kankkunen, Thu, 21 Mar 91 10:16:15 EST
Re: Minutes of the SMTP meeting in St. Louis, Risto Kankkunen, Thu, 21 Mar 91 09:57:52 EST
Re: Minutes of the SMTP meeting in St. Louis, Greg Vaudreuil, Thu, 21 Mar 91 09:57:17 EST
Re: Minutes of the SMTP meeting in St. Louis, Greg Vaudreuil, Thu, 21 Mar 91 09:57:13 EST
Re: RFC-XXXX Boundary Marking, David Robinson, Thu, 21 Mar 91 09:54:29 EST
Re: Minutes of the SMTP meeting in St. Louis, Mark Crispin, Thu, 21 Mar 91 02:53:06 EST
Re: Minutes of the SMTP meeting in St. Louis, Risto Kankkunen, Wed, 20 Mar 91 20:55:18 EST
Re: Minutes of the SMTP meeting in St. Louis, Mark Crispin, Wed, 20 Mar 91 20:04:12 EST
Re: Lastest drfat of RFC-XXXX, Mark Crispin, Wed, 20 Mar 91 19:18:25 EST
The Wretched solution (was Re: Lastest drfat of RFC-XXXX), Risto Kankkunen, Wed, 20 Mar 91 18:48:56 EST
Re: Lastest drfat of RFC-XXXX, Paul A Vixie, Wed, 20 Mar 91 17:58:04 EST
Re: Lastest drfat of RFC-XXXX, Craig_Everhart, Wed, 20 Mar 91 17:34:46 EST
Re: Lastest drfat of RFC-XXXX, Greg Vaudreuil, Wed, 20 Mar 91 17:16:51 EST
Re: Lastest drfat of RFC-XXXX, Nathaniel Borenstein, Wed, 20 Mar 91 17:01:40 EST
Re: Lastest drfat of RFC-XXXX, Paul A Vixie, Wed, 20 Mar 91 16:44:58 EST
Re: Lastest drfat of RFC-XXXX, Neil Rickert, Wed, 20 Mar 91 15:23:52 EST
Re: Lastest drfat of RFC-XXXX, Craig_Everhart, Wed, 20 Mar 91 14:18:54 EST
RE: Lastest drfat of RFC-XXXX, Greg Vaudreuil, Wed, 20 Mar 91 14:09:57 EST
Re: Minutes of the SMTP meeting in St. Louis, Risto Kankkunen, Wed, 20 Mar 91 12:49:39 EST
Lastest drfat of RFC-XXXX, Nathaniel Borenstein, Wed, 20 Mar 91 12:04:32 EST
Writing course, Neil Katin, Tue, 19 Mar 91 15:48:25 PST
Minutes of the SMTP meeting in St. Louis, Greg Vaudreuil, Tue, 19 Mar 91 11:57:41 EST
More on UA configuration (RFC-YYYY), Nathaniel Borenstein, Mon, 18 Mar 91 12:29:15 EST
Forwarded X.400 meeting notes, Ittai Hershman, Wed, 13 Mar 91 21:04:53 EST
Re: 10646 vs. unicode, John C Klensin, Tue, 12 Mar 91 17:27:22 EST
Re: yet more on 8 bit ..., Risto Kankkunen, Tue, 12 Mar 91 13:22:01 EST
Re: a different proposed RFC for 8-bit extension, Risto Kankkunen, Tue, 12 Mar 91 12:22:20 EST
Re: 8-bit draft, Risto Kankkunen, Mon, 11 Mar 91 12:01:57 EST
Re: 8-bit draft, Erik M. van der Poel, Sun, 10 Mar 91 04:23:38 EST
Re: yet more on 8 bit ..., moore, Sat, 9 Mar 91 16:15:44 EST
Re: 10646 vs. unicode, Erik Naggum, Sat, 9 Mar 91 16:08:22 EST
Re: CDs in the mail, Timo Lehtinen, Sat, 9 Mar 91 15:23:31 EST
Re: yet more on 8 bit ..., Keld J|rn Simonsen, Sat, 9 Mar 91 14:16:02 EST
Re: 10646 vs. unicode, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Sat, 9 Mar 91 14:04:46 EST
10646 vs. unicode, Doug Merritt, Fri, 8 Mar 91 21:55:24 EST
New TEXT-HEX draft RFC, Jan Michael Rynning, Fri, 8 Mar 91 17:16:23 EST
Re: CDs in the mail, Nathaniel Borenstein, Fri, 8 Mar 91 15:30:34 EST
Re: yet more on 8 bit ..., Erik Naggum, Fri, 8 Mar 91 15:21:19 EST
Re: 8-bit draft, Erik Naggum, Fri, 8 Mar 91 15:21:01 EST
Re: re: the rest of the free world ..., Erik Naggum, Fri, 8 Mar 91 14:08:36 EST
Re: a different proposed RFC for 8-bit extension, Erik Naggum, Fri, 8 Mar 91 14:08:20 EST
CDs in the mail, Robert Ullmann, Fri, 8 Mar 91 13:44:29 EST
Re: yet more on 8 bit ..., Keld J|rn Simonsen, Fri, 8 Mar 91 11:42:25 EST
RFC-nnnn - Bodypart Encapsulation and Representation of Encoded Information Types, Timo Lehtinen, Thu, 7 Mar 91 22:33:54 EST
Re: 8-bit draft, Erik M. van der Poel, Thu, 7 Mar 91 22:09:13 EST
Re: yet more on 8 bit ..., Hitoshi Doi, Thu, 7 Mar 91 21:53:54 EST
Re: 8-bit draft, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Thu, 7 Mar 91 17:52:20 EST
Yet another proposal for Multi-Part Message Format, Vincent Lau, Thu, 7 Mar 91 15:24:18 EST
Subject: Re: the rest of the free world ..., Dave Crocker, Thu, 7 Mar 91 11:30:53 EST
RFC-YYY: Multimedia Mail Configuration Mechanism, Nathaniel Borenstein, Thu, 7 Mar 91 10:49:48 EST
re John Klensin notes, Robert Ullmann, Thu, 7 Mar 91 10:49:18 EST
RFC-XXX: Multipart Content Type and Encoding Mechanism, Nathaniel Borenstein, Thu, 7 Mar 91 10:48:52 EST
RFCS to read on the airplane, Nathaniel Borenstein, Thu, 7 Mar 91 10:47:58 EST
Re: yet more on 8 bit ..., John C Klensin, Thu, 7 Mar 91 08:49:13 EST
Re: the rest of the free world ..., John C Klensin, Thu, 7 Mar 91 08:03:35 EST
re: the rest of the free world ..., Tim Kehres, Thu, 7 Mar 91 04:47:33 EST
Re: yet more on 8 bit ..., Einar Stefferud, Thu, 7 Mar 91 03:09:31 EST
Re: Robert Ullman's "8-bit draft", Einar Stefferud, Thu, 7 Mar 91 02:22:54 EST
re: yet more on 8 bit ..., Mark Crispin, Thu, 7 Mar 91 01:49:21 EST
re: the rest of the free world ..., Mark Crispin, Thu, 7 Mar 91 00:46:10 EST
yet more on 8 bit ..., Robert Ullmann, Thu, 7 Mar 91 00:42:59 EST
Re: a different proposed RFC for 8-bit extension, John C Klensin, Wed, 6 Mar 91 21:31:12 EST
the rest of the free world ..., Robert Ullmann, Wed, 6 Mar 91 21:17:13 EST
Re: Robert Ullman's "8-bit draft", Mark Crispin, Wed, 6 Mar 91 18:35:34 EST
Re: a different proposed RFC for 8-bit extension, Erik Naggum, Wed, 6 Mar 91 17:09:12 EST
Re: Robert Ullman's "8-bit draft", John C Klensin, Wed, 6 Mar 91 15:51:13 EST
8-bit draft, Robert Ullmann, Wed, 6 Mar 91 13:20:28 EST
Re: a different proposed RFC for 8-bit extension, Mark Crispin, Tue, 5 Mar 91 16:33:57 EST
Re: a different proposed RFC for 8-bit extension, Philippe-Andre Prindeville, Tue, 5 Mar 91 14:34:09 EST
Re: Whether 8-bit SMTP? And how?, John C Klensin, Tue, 5 Mar 91 11:55:29 EST
Re: Whether 8-bit SMTP? And how?, Risto Kankkunen, Tue, 5 Mar 91 10:47:32 EST
re: draft on mnemonic encoding, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Mon, 4 Mar 91 15:46:25 EST
re: draft on mnemonic encoding, Mark Crispin, Sun, 3 Mar 91 19:06:17 EST
Re: Whether 8-bit SMTP? And how?, Mark Crispin, Sun, 3 Mar 91 18:08:03 EST
draft on mnemonic encoding, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Sun, 3 Mar 91 17:15:11 EST
Re: Whether 8-bit SMTP? And how?, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Sun, 3 Mar 91 11:16:09 EST
Re: Whether 8-bit SMTP? And how?, John C Klensin, Sat, 2 Mar 91 08:49:33 EST
Re: Whether 8-bit SMTP? And how?, Erik Naggum, Sat, 2 Mar 91 01:09:25 EST
TEXT-HEX, David Paul Zimmerman, Fri, 1 Mar 91 16:55:34 EST
Re: Whether 8-bit SMTP? And how?, David Herron, Fri, 1 Mar 91 12:20:04 EST
Re: Whether 8-bit SMTP? And how?, Einar Stefferud, Fri, 1 Mar 91 07:08:28 EST
Re: Whether 8-bit SMTP? And how?, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Fri, 1 Mar 91 04:39:49 EST
Re: Unicode..., Paul A Vixie, Thu, 28 Feb 91 23:55:08 EST
Re: Whether 8-bit SMTP? And how?, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Thu, 28 Feb 91 18:38:21 EST
Re: Whether 8-bit SMTP? And how?, Nathaniel Borenstein, Thu, 28 Feb 91 16:12:48 EST
Re: Whether 8-bit SMTP? And how?, David Herron, Thu, 28 Feb 91 14:51:49 EST
Re: Reviewing philosophies and assumptions, doi, Thu, 28 Feb 91 04:54:08 EST
OOPS! Re: Character code sets and all that, Einar Stefferud, Wed, 27 Feb 91 23:17:18 EST
Re: Unicode..., Erik Naggum, Wed, 27 Feb 91 22:10:03 EST
Re: Whether 8-bit SMTP? And how?, moore, Wed, 27 Feb 91 20:39:42 EST
How IBM does it, Andr'e PIRARD, Wed, 27 Feb 91 19:08:53 EST
Re: Unicode..., John C Klensin, Wed, 27 Feb 91 18:04:14 EST
Re: Character code sets and all that, Einar Stefferud, Wed, 27 Feb 91 16:14:37 EST
Re: Unicode..., Rick_McGowan, Wed, 27 Feb 91 14:16:19 EST
The peace proposal--two more orthogonal sets of categories, John C Klensin, Wed, 27 Feb 91 12:06:01 EST
Re: Reviewing philosophies and assumptions, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Wed, 27 Feb 91 11:59:24 EST
Re: Whether 8-bit SMTP? and how?, John C Klensin, Wed, 27 Feb 91 08:47:23 EST
Re: Whether 8-bit SMTP? and how?, moore, Tue, 26 Feb 91 23:06:40 EST
Re: Whether 8-bit SMTP? And how?, doi, Tue, 26 Feb 91 22:08:41 EST

Page 4 of 5
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page] [Last Page]

The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections to this Web page, please send them to phoffman@imc.org.