Archive of ietf-smtp/old-archive, by date

Go to thread index
Go to main page for ietf-smtp/old-archive

Page 5 of 5
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page] [Last Page]

Re: Reviewing philosophies and assumptions, doi, Tue, 26 Feb 91 21:02:56 EST
Re: Whether 8-bit SMTP? And how?, doi, Tue, 26 Feb 91 20:29:36 EST
Re: Unicode..., John C Klensin, Tue, 26 Feb 91 19:00:49 EST
Re: Whether 8-bit SMTP? And how?, John C Klensin, Tue, 26 Feb 91 18:24:05 EST
Re: Whether 8-bit SMTP? And how?, David Robinson, Tue, 26 Feb 91 18:07:39 EST
Re: Whether 8-bit SMTP? And how?, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Tue, 26 Feb 91 17:39:57 EST
re: Whether 8-bit SMTP? and how?, Robert Ullmann, Tue, 26 Feb 91 17:20:31 EST
Re: Whether 8-bit SMTP? And how?, Mark Crispin, Tue, 26 Feb 91 16:30:45 EST
Re: Whether 8-bit SMTP? And how?, moore, Tue, 26 Feb 91 16:18:52 EST
Re: Whether 8-bit SMTP? And how?, moore, Tue, 26 Feb 91 16:00:52 EST
Re: RFC-1204: Message Posting Protocol (MPP), Wai-Hung David Lee, Tue, 26 Feb 91 15:47:08 EST
re: A Formal Peace Proposal, Mark Crispin, Tue, 26 Feb 91 13:57:23 EST
Re: Reviewing philosophies and assumptions, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Tue, 26 Feb 91 13:55:30 EST
"Smart" and "dumb" 8-bit mailers, David Robinson, Tue, 26 Feb 91 13:53:16 EST
Re: Whether 8-bit SMTP? And how?, Nathaniel Borenstein, Tue, 26 Feb 91 13:50:16 EST
Re: A Formal Peace Proposal, Nathaniel Borenstein, Tue, 26 Feb 91 13:27:26 EST
Re: A Formal Peace Proposal, Risto Kankkunen, Tue, 26 Feb 91 13:21:10 EST
Re: RFC 934 for multipart encoding, Erik Naggum, Tue, 26 Feb 91 13:12:21 EST
Re: Unicode..., Erik Naggum, Tue, 26 Feb 91 13:11:46 EST
Re: Whether 8-bit SMTP? And how?, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Tue, 26 Feb 91 13:06:27 EST
ADDENDUM: SMTP and new 822 interworking, Greg Vaudreuil, Tue, 26 Feb 91 12:24:05 EST
RE: A Formal Peace Proposal, Greg Vaudreuil, Tue, 26 Feb 91 12:09:52 EST
Re: Whether 8-bit SMTP? And how?, Robert Ullmann, Tue, 26 Feb 91 11:32:45 EST
Re: Whether 8-bit SMTP? And how?, Risto Kankkunen, Tue, 26 Feb 91 11:24:53 EST
Re: Whether 8-bit SMTP? And how?, Alain FONTAINE (Postmaster - NAD), Tue, 26 Feb 91 11:00:24 EST
Re: Whether 8-bit SMTP? And how?, Risto Kankkunen, Tue, 26 Feb 91 10:01:18 EST
A Formal Peace Proposal, Nathaniel Borenstein, Tue, 26 Feb 91 09:50:48 EST
Re: Whether 8-bit SMTP? And how?, Nathaniel Borenstein, Tue, 26 Feb 91 09:33:06 EST
Re: Responsive vendors and their implications (was de-facto 8 bit, Alain FONTAINE (Postmaster - NAD), Tue, 26 Feb 91 09:27:47 EST
Re: RFC 934 for multipart encoding, Risto Kankkunen, Tue, 26 Feb 91 09:26:07 EST
Re: Whether 8-bit SMTP? And how?, John C Klensin, Tue, 26 Feb 91 08:41:09 EST
Re: A proposal, Risto Kankkunen, Tue, 26 Feb 91 08:29:33 EST
Whether 8-bit SMTP? And how?, moore, Tue, 26 Feb 91 05:24:55 EST
Re: Reviewing philosophies and assumptions, Hitoshi Doi, Mon, 25 Feb 91 23:49:40 EST
Re: nsb@thumper.bellcore.com (Nathaniel Borenstein)'s mail, Hitoshi Doi, Mon, 25 Feb 91 23:39:36 EST
Re: Reviewing philosophies and assumptions, Erik M. van der Poel, Mon, 25 Feb 91 22:59:03 EST
Re: RFC 934 for multipart encoding, Einar Stefferud, Mon, 25 Feb 91 17:58:15 EST
Re: Unicode..., Einar Stefferud, Mon, 25 Feb 91 17:58:14 EST
Re: Reviewing philosophies and assumptions, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Mon, 25 Feb 91 17:44:31 EST
more Unicod, Rick_McGowan, Mon, 25 Feb 91 17:37:53 EST
Re: SMTP and new 822 interworking, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Mon, 25 Feb 91 17:33:39 EST
re: Unicode..., Mark Crispin, Mon, 25 Feb 91 16:50:54 EST
Re: Unicode..., Robert Ullmann, Mon, 25 Feb 91 16:31:03 EST
Unicode..., Rick_McGowan, Mon, 25 Feb 91 15:01:03 EST
Re: Responsive vendors and their implications (was de-facto 8 bit, Nathaniel Borenstein, Mon, 25 Feb 91 14:24:05 EST
Re: RFC 934 for multipart encoding, Nathaniel Borenstein, Mon, 25 Feb 91 14:11:18 EST
Re: RFC 934 for multipart encoding, Erik Naggum, Mon, 25 Feb 91 12:15:49 EST
Re: Responsive vendors and their implications (was de-facto 8 bit, Erik Naggum, Mon, 25 Feb 91 12:15:24 EST
Re: SMTP and new 822 interworking, Risto Kankkunen, Mon, 25 Feb 91 10:30:35 EST
Re: SMTP and FTP..., Steve Goldstein--Ph 202-357-9717, Mon, 25 Feb 91 09:50:27 EST
Re: Making secret SMTP changes, Risto Kankkunen, Mon, 25 Feb 91 09:30:51 EST
Re: A multiple bodypart multiple content type message, Nathaniel Borenstein, Mon, 25 Feb 91 09:24:01 EST
Re: RFC 934 for multipart encoding, Nathaniel Borenstein, Mon, 25 Feb 91 09:18:10 EST
Re: Reviewing philosophies and assumptions, Risto Kankkunen, Mon, 25 Feb 91 09:11:26 EST
Re: Reviewing philosophies and assumptions, Olle J{rnefors, Mon, 25 Feb 91 06:59:12 EST
Re: Reviewing philosophies and assumptions, Erik M. van der Poel, Mon, 25 Feb 91 05:40:36 EST
Re: A multiple bodypart multiple content type message, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Mon, 25 Feb 91 04:52:21 EST
Re: Reviewing philosophies and assumptions, Erik M. van der Poel, Mon, 25 Feb 91 04:20:13 EST
Re: RFC 934 for multipart encoding, Einar Stefferud, Mon, 25 Feb 91 03:33:24 EST
RFC 934 for multipart encoding, Nathaniel Borenstein, Sun, 24 Feb 91 22:29:35 EST
Re: Responsive vendors and their implications (was de-facto 8 bit smtp), Nathaniel Borenstein, Sun, 24 Feb 91 22:10:22 EST
Re: de-facto 8 bit SMTP, Nathaniel Borenstein, Sun, 24 Feb 91 22:05:29 EST
Re: A multiple bodypart multiple content type message, Olle J{rnefors, Sun, 24 Feb 91 16:05:15 EST
The process of reaching agreement, John C Klensin, Sat, 23 Feb 91 23:46:45 EST
re: de-facto 8 bit SMTP, Mark Crispin, Sat, 23 Feb 91 20:51:38 EST
OSI spy spotted!, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Sat, 23 Feb 91 18:30:41 EST
Re: A proposal, Einar Stefferud, Sat, 23 Feb 91 18:07:25 EST
Duplicate ietf-smtp messages ..., Einar Stefferud, Sat, 23 Feb 91 18:07:19 EST
Re: A proposal, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Sat, 23 Feb 91 17:01:01 EST
Re: A proposal, Erik Naggum, Sat, 23 Feb 91 15:10:31 EST
Re: Reviewing philosophies and assumptions, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Sat, 23 Feb 91 12:47:30 EST
Re: A proposal, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Sat, 23 Feb 91 11:53:26 EST
Re: A proposal, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Sat, 23 Feb 91 10:42:14 EST
Re: A proposal, Erik Naggum, Sat, 23 Feb 91 09:09:21 EST
Re: A proposal, Erik Naggum, Sat, 23 Feb 91 08:09:53 EST
SMTP and FTP..., David Robinson, Fri, 22 Feb 91 21:32:10 EST
re John Klensin on my 8-bit comments, Robert Ullmann, Fri, 22 Feb 91 21:22:22 EST
'MAIL" definition, Einar Stefferud, Fri, 22 Feb 91 20:17:56 EST
Re: Let's make a decision this March, Einar Stefferud, Fri, 22 Feb 91 20:17:55 EST
Re: SMTP and new 822 interworking, Einar Stefferud, Fri, 22 Feb 91 20:16:55 EST
Responsive vendors and their implications (was de-facto 8 bit smtp), John C Klensin, Fri, 22 Feb 91 20:06:40 EST
Making secret SMTP changes, John C Klensin, Fri, 22 Feb 91 16:52:44 EST
SMTP and FTP, John C Klensin, Fri, 22 Feb 91 16:51:23 EST
Re: Reviewing philosophies and assumptions, John C Klensin, Fri, 22 Feb 91 16:49:35 EST
Re: A proposal, Risto Kankkunen, Fri, 22 Feb 91 14:51:12 EST
Re: A proposal, Risto Kankkunen, Fri, 22 Feb 91 14:35:43 EST
de-facto 8 bit SMTP, Robert Ullmann, Fri, 22 Feb 91 14:03:59 EST
changing 821 and 822, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Fri, 22 Feb 91 13:48:11 EST
Re: SMTP and new 822 interworking, Risto Kankkunen, Fri, 22 Feb 91 13:13:50 EST
Let's make a decision this March, Greg Vaudreuil, Fri, 22 Feb 91 11:15:13 EST
Re: A proposal, Nathaniel Borenstein, Fri, 22 Feb 91 10:06:16 EST
A proposal, Erik Naggum, Fri, 22 Feb 91 09:10:11 EST
Re: Update of RFC 1148, Einar Stefferud, Fri, 22 Feb 91 05:48:45 EST
8-7-8-7-8-.... (a suggestion), Shannon Yeh, Thu, 21 Feb 91 22:38:42 EST
use of ISO 2022 in Japanese net, Erik M. van der Poel, Thu, 21 Feb 91 20:37:39 EST
Re: SMTP and new 822 interworking, Paul A Vixie, Thu, 21 Feb 91 19:54:38 EST
Re: SMTP and new 822 interworking, Paul A Vixie, Thu, 21 Feb 91 19:30:35 EST
Re: Reviewing philosophies and assumptions, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Thu, 21 Feb 91 17:57:05 EST
Re: looking for other vendors, Isaac, Thu, 21 Feb 91 16:00:11 EST
Re: SMTP and new 822 interworking, Risto Kankkunen, Thu, 21 Feb 91 14:44:57 EST
Re: Reviewing philosophies and assumptions, Risto Kankkunen, Thu, 21 Feb 91 14:34:03 EST
Re: SMTP and new 822 interworking, Greg Vaudreuil, Thu, 21 Feb 91 13:46:04 EST
Re: SMTP and new 822 interworking, Risto Kankkunen, Thu, 21 Feb 91 13:44:17 EST
Re: SMTP and new 822 interworking, Risto Kankkunen, Thu, 21 Feb 91 13:36:36 EST
Re: SMTP and new 822 interworking, Risto Kankkunen, Thu, 21 Feb 91 12:38:04 EST
Re: Agenda for the working group (resend), Steve Kille, Thu, 21 Feb 91 04:12:54 EST
more side-grist for the mill, Dave Crocker, Thu, 21 Feb 91 01:36:07 EST
Re: SMTP and new 822 interworking, Paul A Vixie, Thu, 21 Feb 91 01:29:16 EST
Public intro private: more history, Dave Crocker, Thu, 21 Feb 91 01:28:03 EST
Re: SMTP and new 822 interworking, Paul A Vixie, Thu, 21 Feb 91 00:52:19 EST
Re: SMTP and new 822 interworking, Mark Crispin, Thu, 21 Feb 91 00:34:13 EST
Re: RFC-1204: Message Posting Protocol (MPP), James M Galvin, Thu, 21 Feb 91 00:25:25 EST
The future?, Ittai Hershman, Wed, 20 Feb 91 21:43:19 EST
Re: looking for other vendors, Shannon Yeh, Wed, 20 Feb 91 21:12:58 EST
Re: RFC-1204: Message Posting Protocol (MPP), Shannon Yeh, Wed, 20 Feb 91 21:10:49 EST
Re: SMTP and new 822 interworking, David Robinson, Wed, 20 Feb 91 20:31:35 EST
looking for other vendors, Robert Ullmann, Wed, 20 Feb 91 20:31:28 EST
Re: RFC-1204: Message Posting Protocol (MPP), Dave Crocker, Wed, 20 Feb 91 20:23:20 EST
Crazy old suggestion, Dave Crocker, Wed, 20 Feb 91 18:51:18 EST
Re: SMTP and new 822 interworking, Greg Vaudreuil, Wed, 20 Feb 91 14:57:04 EST
Reviewing philosophies and assumptions, John C Klensin, Wed, 20 Feb 91 14:45:53 EST
Re: SMTP and new 822 interworking, Neil Rickert, Wed, 20 Feb 91 14:23:12 EST
Re: SMTP and new 822 interworking, Shannon Yeh, Wed, 20 Feb 91 14:20:13 EST
Re: A multiple bodypart multiple content type message, Steve Kille, Wed, 20 Feb 91 12:35:36 EST
Re: A multiple bodypart multiple content type message, Steve Kille, Wed, 20 Feb 91 12:31:49 EST
forwarding previously-private reply to Risto Kankkunen, Paul A Vixie, Wed, 20 Feb 91 12:25:18 EST
forwarded by request of the author. my reply follows., Paul A Vixie, Wed, 20 Feb 91 12:23:49 EST
Re: proposed rfc on SMTP and 10646, Einar Stefferud, Wed, 20 Feb 91 12:18:42 EST
Re: proposed rfc on SMTP and 10646, Paul A Vixie, Wed, 20 Feb 91 12:15:03 EST
Re: Update of RFC 1148, Steve Kille, Wed, 20 Feb 91 11:18:26 EST
Update of RFC 1148, Steve Kille, Wed, 20 Feb 91 11:18:22 EST
SMTP and new 822 interworking, Greg Vaudreuil, Wed, 20 Feb 91 10:54:24 EST
Re: proposed rfc on SMTP and 10646, Ittai Hershman, Wed, 20 Feb 91 08:11:59 EST
Re: proposed rfc on SMTP and 10646, Einar Stefferud, Wed, 20 Feb 91 06:27:50 EST
request to join the list, Wai-Hung David Lee, Tue, 19 Feb 91 21:46:47 EST
Re: RFC-1204: Message Posting Protocol (MPP), Shannon Yeh, Tue, 19 Feb 91 18:47:01 EST
Re: RFC-1204: Message Posting Protocol (MPP), Einar Stefferud, Tue, 19 Feb 91 18:21:31 EST
Re: RFC-1204: Message Posting Protocol (MPP), Dave Crocker, Tue, 19 Feb 91 16:39:34 EST
Re: proposed rfc on SMTP and 10646, Paul A Vixie, Tue, 19 Feb 91 16:05:03 EST
Re: is this related to SMTP?, Einar Stefferud, Tue, 19 Feb 91 15:56:01 EST
Re: Need for successive encodings, Dave Crocker, Tue, 19 Feb 91 13:30:25 EST
Re: is this related to SMTP?, John Noerenberg, Tue, 19 Feb 91 11:01:24 EST
Re: Need for successive encodings, Erik Naggum, Tue, 19 Feb 91 10:09:22 EST
Re: proposed rfc on SMTP and 10646, Andr'e PIRARD, Tue, 19 Feb 91 07:44:59 EST
Re: Update of RFC 1148, Christian Huitema, Tue, 19 Feb 91 03:11:16 EST
Re: RFC-1204: Message Posting Protocol (MPP), Einar Stefferud, Tue, 19 Feb 91 01:19:37 EST
Re: Solving the right problem, at the right level, Einar Stefferud, Tue, 19 Feb 91 00:16:39 EST
Solving the right problem, at the right level, Dave Crocker, Mon, 18 Feb 91 21:28:34 EST
Thoughts on RFC1204 (MPP), Dave Crocker, Mon, 18 Feb 91 21:21:16 EST
Re: is this related to SMTP?, Einar Stefferud, Mon, 18 Feb 91 19:57:24 EST
Re: is this related to SMTP?, Dave Crocker, Mon, 18 Feb 91 15:06:50 EST
Re: RFC-1204: Message Posting Protocol (MPP), Wai-Hung David Lee, Mon, 18 Feb 91 14:40:50 EST
Re: is this related to SMTP?, David Herron, Mon, 18 Feb 91 14:27:03 EST
Re: Basics for the new standard to be defined., Valdis Kletnieks, Mon, 18 Feb 91 14:26:03 EST
Re: RFC-1204: Message Posting Protocol (MPP), David Herron, Mon, 18 Feb 91 13:15:55 EST
Re: is this related to SMTP?, Nathaniel Borenstein, Mon, 18 Feb 91 13:14:05 EST
is this related to SMTP?, Paul A Vixie, Mon, 18 Feb 91 12:48:16 EST
Re: A multiple bodypart multiple content type message, Nathaniel Borenstein, Mon, 18 Feb 91 10:52:22 EST
Re: A multiple bodypart multiple content type message, Erik Naggum, Mon, 18 Feb 91 10:10:27 EST
Re: Basics for the new standard to be defined., Olle J{rnefors, Mon, 18 Feb 91 08:58:21 EST
Re: Comments to comments to my proposal, Olle J{rnefors, Mon, 18 Feb 91 08:55:55 EST
Re: A multiple bodypart multiple content type message, Olle J{rnefors, Mon, 18 Feb 91 08:54:05 EST
Need for successive encodings, Olle J{rnefors, Mon, 18 Feb 91 08:51:41 EST
Re: Basics for the new standard to be defined., Erik Naggum, Mon, 18 Feb 91 08:11:01 EST
Re: Basics for the new standard to be defined. Basics for the new standard to be defined., Paul A Vixie, Mon, 18 Feb 91 07:25:52 EST
Re: A multiple bodypart multiple content type message, Olle J{rnefors, Mon, 18 Feb 91 04:14:01 EST
To split a long multiple bodypart message, Olle J{rnefors, Mon, 18 Feb 91 04:14:01 EST
Re: Basics for the new standard to be defined., Dan Oscarsson, Mon, 18 Feb 91 03:50:18 EST
RFC-1204: Message Posting Protocol (MPP), David Herron, Sun, 17 Feb 91 22:36:23 EST
relations between SMTP/RFC822 and other realms, Einar Stefferud, Sun, 17 Feb 91 22:15:31 EST
Re: A multiple bodypart multiple content type message, Einar Stefferud, Sun, 17 Feb 91 21:35:45 EST
Re: A multiple bodypart multiple content type message, Einar Stefferud, Sun, 17 Feb 91 19:40:29 EST
Re: definition of a line in SMTP, Erik Naggum, Sun, 17 Feb 91 18:09:30 EST
Re: Basics for the new standard to be defined., Valdis Kletnieks, Sun, 17 Feb 91 17:19:34 EST
Re: A multiple bodypart multiple content type message, Risto Kankkunen, Sun, 17 Feb 91 16:33:41 EST
Basics for the new standard to be defined., Dan Oscarsson, Sun, 17 Feb 91 07:44:31 EST
Re: A multiple bodypart multiple content type message, Einar Stefferud, Sun, 17 Feb 91 04:17:13 EST
Re: A multiple bodypart multiple content type message, Timo Lehtinen, Sat, 16 Feb 91 15:52:47 EST
Re: A multiple bodypart multiple content type message, Risto Kankkunen, Sat, 16 Feb 91 12:23:09 EST
Re: A multiple bodypart multiple content type message, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Fri, 15 Feb 91 21:22:35 EST
A multiple bodypart multiple content type message, Timo Lehtinen, Fri, 15 Feb 91 14:17:22 EST
Re: a different proposed RFC for 8-bit extension, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Fri, 15 Feb 91 00:41:23 EST
Re: a different proposed RFC for 8-bit extension, David Herron, Thu, 14 Feb 91 22:07:07 EST
Re: A "line" in 821/822 vs a "line" on my O/S..., Einar Stefferud, Thu, 14 Feb 91 21:03:47 EST
Re: a different proposed RFC for 8-bit extension, Mark Crispin, Thu, 14 Feb 91 19:21:08 EST
Re: How many SMTP hosts are there on the internet?, Dave Crocker, Thu, 14 Feb 91 18:55:46 EST
Re: Sorry!, Dave Crocker, Thu, 14 Feb 91 18:47:55 EST
Re: a different proposed RFC for 8-bit extension, Dave Crocker, Thu, 14 Feb 91 18:37:52 EST
SMTP "options", Dave Crocker, Thu, 14 Feb 91 18:30:44 EST
Re: ODA over SMTP, Dave Crocker, Thu, 14 Feb 91 18:27:50 EST
[no subject], Robert Ullmann, Thu, 14 Feb 91 13:50:26 EST
Re: A "line" in 821/822 vs a "line" on my O/S..., David Herron, Thu, 14 Feb 91 13:31:15 EST
Re: How many SMTP hosts are there on the internet?, John Noerenberg, Thu, 14 Feb 91 11:05:24 EST
Re: proposed rfc on SMTP and 10646, Dan Oscarsson, Thu, 14 Feb 91 09:44:02 EST
Character codes allowed in DATA part, Risto Kankkunen, Thu, 14 Feb 91 08:45:12 EST
Re: A "line" in 821/822 vs a "line" on my O/S..., Dave Crocker, Thu, 14 Feb 91 02:02:24 EST
Re: A "line" in 821/822 vs a "line" on my O/S..., Mark Crispin, Thu, 14 Feb 91 01:31:01 EST
Re: A "line" in 821/822 vs a "line" on my O/S..., Dave Crocker, Thu, 14 Feb 91 01:12:23 EST
re: A "line" in 821/822 vs a "line" on my O/S..., Mark Crispin, Thu, 14 Feb 91 00:14:58 EST
Readability of deeply-encapsulated messages..., David Robinson, Wed, 13 Feb 91 22:30:49 EST
How many SMTP hosts are there on the internet?, David Robinson, Wed, 13 Feb 91 22:18:56 EST
A "line" in 821/822 vs a "line" on my O/S..., David Robinson, Wed, 13 Feb 91 22:14:11 EST
Proposed rfc & proposed agenda, Robert Ullmann, Wed, 13 Feb 91 19:01:23 EST
Re: definition of a line in SMTP, Dave Crocker, Wed, 13 Feb 91 18:59:37 EST
re: a different proposed RFC for 8-bit extension, Mark Crispin, Wed, 13 Feb 91 17:56:20 EST
Proposed rfc to extend to 10646, Robert Ullmann, Wed, 13 Feb 91 17:47:47 EST
Re: definition of a line in SMTP, Mark Crispin, Wed, 13 Feb 91 17:26:12 EST
Proposed rfc & proposed agenda, Nathaniel Borenstein, Wed, 13 Feb 91 17:17:11 EST
Re: definition of a line in SMTP, John C Klensin, Wed, 13 Feb 91 17:04:46 EST
Re: definition of a line in SMTP, Valdis Kletnieks, Wed, 13 Feb 91 16:54:50 EST
Re: definition of a line in SMTP, Neil Rickert, N Illinois U, CS, Wed, 13 Feb 91 16:31:54 EST
Re: definition of a line in SMTP, John C Klensin, Wed, 13 Feb 91 16:19:19 EST
Re: Re: definition of a line in SMTP, John C Klensin, Wed, 13 Feb 91 16:09:50 EST
Re: definition of a line in SMTP, Erik Naggum, Wed, 13 Feb 91 16:07:28 EST
Re: ODA over SMTP, Erik Naggum, Wed, 13 Feb 91 15:15:00 EST
re: a different proposed RFC for 8-bit extension, David Robinson, Wed, 13 Feb 91 13:30:41 EST
re: proposed rfc on SMTP and 10646, David Robinson, Wed, 13 Feb 91 13:19:20 EST
Re: definition of a line in SMTP, Neil Rickert, N Illinois U, CS, Wed, 13 Feb 91 11:02:46 EST
Re: definition of a line in SMTP, Valdis Kletnieks, Wed, 13 Feb 91 10:53:52 EST
Agenda for the March IETF Internet Mail Meetings, Greg Vaudreuil, Wed, 13 Feb 91 10:14:50 EST
Sorry!, David Paul Zimmerman, Wed, 13 Feb 91 09:45:22 EST
Comments to comments to my proposal, Dan Oscarsson, Wed, 13 Feb 91 04:11:47 EST
Re: ODA over SMTP, John C Klensin, Wed, 13 Feb 91 01:32:26 EST
Proposed rfc to extend to 10646, John C Klensin, Wed, 13 Feb 91 01:31:32 EST
Agenda for the working group, Dave Crocker, Wed, 13 Feb 91 00:07:06 EST
Re: definition of a line in SMTP, Neil Rickert, Tue, 12 Feb 91 23:58:33 EST
definition of a line in SMTP, Mark Crispin, Tue, 12 Feb 91 19:20:34 EST
Re: ODA over SMTP, Russ Hobby, Tue, 12 Feb 91 19:19:28 EST
a different proposed RFC for 8-bit extension, Mark Crispin, Tue, 12 Feb 91 19:17:11 EST
reply to MRC, Robert Ullmann, Tue, 12 Feb 91 19:08:22 EST
re: proposed rfc on SMTP and 10646, Mark Crispin, Tue, 12 Feb 91 18:23:09 EST
Re: "Painless" boundary markers, Olle J{rnefors, Tue, 12 Feb 91 17:40:49 EST
Re: "Painless" boundary markers, Olle J{rnefors, Tue, 12 Feb 91 17:40:06 EST
Re: world character sets, David Robinson, Tue, 12 Feb 91 17:28:38 EST
proposed rfc on SMTP and 10646, Robert Ullmann, Tue, 12 Feb 91 17:16:10 EST
Boundary markers/ header-no body, John C Klensin, Tue, 12 Feb 91 16:35:56 EST
Re: DIS 10646, embedding, universal character sets, etc, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Tue, 12 Feb 91 16:11:12 EST
Re: "Painless" boundary markers, Philippe-Andre Prindeville, Tue, 12 Feb 91 15:25:28 EST
Re: world character sets, John C Klensin, Tue, 12 Feb 91 14:53:35 EST
Re: DIS 10646, embedding, universal character sets, etc, John C Klensin, Tue, 12 Feb 91 14:39:00 EST
Re: world character sets, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Tue, 12 Feb 91 13:58:20 EST
Re: DIS 10646, embedding, universal character sets, etc, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Tue, 12 Feb 91 12:00:40 EST
Re: Further comments on RFC-1154 line-counts, Philippe-Andre Prindeville, Tue, 12 Feb 91 10:56:07 EST
Re: world character sets, John C Klensin, Mon, 11 Feb 91 18:44:06 EST
Re: world character sets, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Mon, 11 Feb 91 15:40:59 EST
Re: "Painless" boundary markers, Valdis Kletnieks, Mon, 11 Feb 91 13:16:34 EST
Re: "Painless" boundary markers, John C Klensin, Mon, 11 Feb 91 13:13:06 EST
"Painless" boundary markers, Olle J{rnefors, Mon, 11 Feb 91 11:57:41 EST
DIS 10646, embedding, universal character sets, etc, John C Klensin, Sun, 10 Feb 91 23:00:50 EST
Re: Proposal of new standard, Risto Kankkunen, Sun, 10 Feb 91 19:00:36 EST
Re: RFC1154 line counts again, Mark Crispin, Sun, 10 Feb 91 18:18:13 EST
Re: Who says 1154 is not recursive?, Mark Crispin, Sun, 10 Feb 91 18:10:10 EST
Re: Who says 1154 is not recursive?, Risto Kankkunen, Sun, 10 Feb 91 15:38:51 EST
Re: Who says 1154 is not recursive?, Nathaniel Borenstein, Sun, 10 Feb 91 14:08:50 EST
Proposal of new standard, Dan Oscarsson, Sun, 10 Feb 91 14:06:56 EST
ODA over SMTP, John C Klensin, Sat, 9 Feb 91 13:11:10 EST
Re: Exactly how big is BITNET?, Roger Fajman, Fri, 8 Feb 91 19:16:02 EST
Who says 1154 is not recursive?, David Robinson, Fri, 8 Feb 91 18:28:39 EST
Re: Re: Further comments on RFC-1154 line-counts, Roger Fajman, Fri, 8 Feb 91 17:41:43 EST
Re: Re: Further comments on RFC-1154 line-counts, David Robinson, Fri, 8 Feb 91 15:07:58 EST
re: Nathaniels comments, Risto Kankkunen, Fri, 8 Feb 91 10:26:40 EST
Re: Exactly how big is BITNET?, Ittai Hershman, Fri, 8 Feb 91 10:18:59 EST
Re: In defense of RFC-1154, Peter Sylvester +33 1 69823973, Fri, 8 Feb 91 09:55:43 EST
how bit is bitnet, Walt Daniels, Fri, 8 Feb 91 09:12:16 EST
Re: Exactly how big is BITNET?, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Thu, 7 Feb 91 22:56:13 EST
Re: Exactly how big is BITNET?, Roger Fajman, Thu, 7 Feb 91 22:35:51 EST
Re: Re: Further comments on RFC-1154 line-counts, Roger Fajman, Thu, 7 Feb 91 22:22:05 EST
Bitnet protocols (NJE...), Michael Stein, Thu, 7 Feb 91 22:05:45 EST
Re: Re: Further comments on RFC-1154 line-counts, John C Klensin, Thu, 7 Feb 91 21:33:05 EST
Re: RFC1154 line counts again, Einar Stefferud, Thu, 7 Feb 91 21:14:44 EST
Re: Exactly how big is BITNET?, John C Klensin, Thu, 7 Feb 91 21:12:21 EST
Re: Further comments on RFC-1154 line-counts, Roger Fajman, Thu, 7 Feb 91 20:47:32 EST
Re: RFC1154 line counts again, Robert Ullmann, Thu, 7 Feb 91 20:40:42 EST
Re: Nathaniels comments, Bill Cattey, Thu, 7 Feb 91 20:09:39 EST
Exactly how big is BITNET?, David Robinson, Thu, 7 Feb 91 19:54:31 EST
RFC1154 line counts again, Mark Crispin, Thu, 7 Feb 91 18:49:01 EST
Re: Further comments on RFC-1154 line-counts, John C Klensin, Thu, 7 Feb 91 17:59:41 EST
Re: Further comments on RFC-1154 line-counts, Robert Ullmann, Thu, 7 Feb 91 16:27:02 EST
re: Nathaniels comments, Robert Ullmann, Thu, 7 Feb 91 15:46:15 EST
Re: Further comments on RFC-1154 line-counts, John C Klensin, Thu, 7 Feb 91 15:31:58 EST
Re: In defense of RFC-1154, Risto Kankkunen, Thu, 7 Feb 91 14:24:13 EST
Re: Ned Freed comments, Risto Kankkunen, Thu, 7 Feb 91 14:08:17 EST
Re: In defense of RFC-1154, Nathaniel Borenstein, Thu, 7 Feb 91 13:55:31 EST
SAMPLE ANDREW MESSAGE, Nathaniel Borenstein, Thu, 7 Feb 91 13:52:26 EST
re: Nathaniels comments, Risto Kankkunen, Thu, 7 Feb 91 13:51:18 EST
Re: Nathaniels comments, Nathaniel Borenstein, Thu, 7 Feb 91 13:49:31 EST
Further comments on RFC-1154 line-counts, David Robinson, Thu, 7 Feb 91 13:15:42 EST
Re: Ned Freed comments, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Thu, 7 Feb 91 12:42:00 EST
Re: In defense of RFC-1154, Peter Sylvester +33 1 69823973, Thu, 7 Feb 91 12:38:54 EST
re: Nathaniels comments, Robert Ullmann, Thu, 7 Feb 91 12:09:24 EST
Re: Ned Freed comments, Robert Ullmann, Thu, 7 Feb 91 11:51:28 EST
Re: In defense of RFC-1154, Risto Kankkunen, Thu, 7 Feb 91 10:58:14 EST
Re: In defense of RFC-1154, Nathaniel Borenstein, Thu, 7 Feb 91 09:59:03 EST
Let's concentrate on SMTP first, Risto Kankkunen, Thu, 7 Feb 91 09:22:34 EST
Re: In defense of RFC-1154, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Tue, 5 Feb 91 18:49:30 EST
In defense of RFC-1154, David Robinson, Mon, 4 Feb 91 22:49:27 EST
Re: world character sets, Philippe-Andre Prindeville, Mon, 4 Feb 91 18:04:00 EST
Re: world character sets, Robert Ullmann, Mon, 4 Feb 91 16:14:24 EST
Re: world character sets, Philippe-Andre Prindeville, Mon, 4 Feb 91 15:48:18 EST
Re: world character sets, Mark Crispin, Mon, 4 Feb 91 15:19:25 EST
Re: world character sets, Philippe-Andre Prindeville, Mon, 4 Feb 91 14:57:42 EST
world character sets, Mark Crispin, Mon, 4 Feb 91 13:10:15 EST
ECMA letter to Unicode, Mike Ksar, Mon, 4 Feb 91 11:15:03 EST
Re: The Next Step, Andr'e PIRARD, Mon, 4 Feb 91 11:08:58 EST
Re: Re: Character code sets and all that, Mark Crispin, Sat, 2 Feb 91 13:18:38 EST
Re: re RFC1154 and such, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Sat, 2 Feb 91 04:10:44 EST
Re: Re: Character code sets and all that, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Sat, 2 Feb 91 01:09:22 EST
Re: The Next Step, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Sat, 2 Feb 91 00:49:12 EST
Re: ISO2022, Registrations, and ISO8859-n, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Sat, 2 Feb 91 00:24:44 EST
My faux pas, tep, Fri, 1 Feb 91 19:53:42 EST
Re: Character code sets and all that, Nathaniel Borenstein, Fri, 1 Feb 91 14:34:06 EST
Character code sets and all that, tep, Fri, 1 Feb 91 12:53:13 EST
Re: Re: Character code sets and all that, Jan Michael Rynning, Fri, 1 Feb 91 12:12:26 EST
Re: Character code sets and all that, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Fri, 1 Feb 91 12:04:33 EST
Re: on mailing binaries, Alain FONTAINE (Postmaster - NAD), Fri, 1 Feb 91 10:48:49 EST
Re: Character code sets and all that, Jan Michael Rynning, Fri, 1 Feb 91 10:31:09 EST
Nuking RFC 1154 (Re: Character code sets and all that), Nathaniel Borenstein, Fri, 1 Feb 91 09:49:44 EST
Re: Character code sets and all that, Nathaniel Borenstein, Fri, 1 Feb 91 09:35:55 EST
Re: The Next Step, Risto Kankkunen, Fri, 1 Feb 91 09:34:30 EST
Re: Character code sets and all that, Philippe-Andre Prindeville, Fri, 1 Feb 91 07:35:58 EST
Re: The Next Step, Dan Oscarsson, Fri, 1 Feb 91 06:53:13 EST
Re: Character code sets and all that, Andr'e PIRARD, Fri, 1 Feb 91 06:48:09 EST
Re: Character code sets and all that, Brian Kantor, Thu, 31 Jan 91 23:06:20 EST
Re: Character code sets and all that, Robert Ullmann, Thu, 31 Jan 91 21:10:37 EST
Re: Character code sets and all that, Mark Crispin, Thu, 31 Jan 91 19:17:22 EST
Re: Re: Character code sets and all that, Mark Crispin, Thu, 31 Jan 91 19:06:26 EST
Re: Character code sets and all that, Valdis Kletnieks, Thu, 31 Jan 91 18:39:49 EST
Re: Character code sets and all that, Edward C. Bennett, Thu, 31 Jan 91 18:29:10 EST
Re: Character code sets and all that, Neil W. Rickert, Thu, 31 Jan 91 17:54:51 EST
Re: Character code sets and all that, Valdis Kletnieks, Thu, 31 Jan 91 17:42:22 EST
re RFC1154 and such, Robert Ullmann, Thu, 31 Jan 91 17:30:46 EST
Re: The Next Step, Philippe-Andre Prindeville, Thu, 31 Jan 91 17:19:34 EST
Re: Character code sets and all that, Walt Daniels, Thu, 31 Jan 91 17:12:06 EST
Re: Character code sets and all that, jwagner, Thu, 31 Jan 91 16:09:18 EST
The Next Step, Greg Vaudreuil, Thu, 31 Jan 91 15:45:37 EST
Re: Character code sets and all that, Neil Rickert, Thu, 31 Jan 91 15:27:32 EST
Re: Character code sets and all that, Andr'e PIRARD, Thu, 31 Jan 91 15:25:06 EST
Re: Re: Character code sets and all that, Andr'e PIRARD, Thu, 31 Jan 91 15:16:16 EST
Re: Character code sets and all that, Nathaniel Borenstein, Thu, 31 Jan 91 15:14:01 EST
Re: Character code sets and all that, Jan Michael Rynning, Thu, 31 Jan 91 15:12:00 EST
Re: Character code sets and all that, Philippe-Andre Prindeville, Thu, 31 Jan 91 14:35:40 EST
8-bit text is not binary, Jan Michael Rynning, Thu, 31 Jan 91 13:59:10 EST
Re: Character code sets and all that, Edward C. Bennett, Thu, 31 Jan 91 13:52:45 EST
Re: Character code sets and all that, Andr'e PIRARD, Thu, 31 Jan 91 13:12:17 EST
Re: Character code sets and all that, Philippe-Andre Prindeville, Thu, 31 Jan 91 12:14:29 EST
Re: Character code sets and all that, Philippe-Andre Prindeville, Thu, 31 Jan 91 11:53:09 EST
Re: Character code sets and all that, Jan Michael Rynning, Thu, 31 Jan 91 11:50:02 EST
Re: Character code sets and all that, Philippe-Andre Prindeville, Thu, 31 Jan 91 11:45:02 EST
Re: Character code sets and all that, Philippe-Andre Prindeville, Thu, 31 Jan 91 11:33:50 EST
Re: Character code sets and all that, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Thu, 31 Jan 91 11:25:10 EST
Re: ISO2022, Registrations, and ISO8859-n, John C Klensin, Thu, 31 Jan 91 11:05:34 EST
Re: Re: Character code sets and all that, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Thu, 31 Jan 91 10:44:12 EST
Re: Re: Character code sets and all that, Jan Michael Rynning, Thu, 31 Jan 91 10:43:58 EST
Re: Character code sets and all that, John C Klensin, Thu, 31 Jan 91 10:37:07 EST
Re: Character code sets and all that, Jan Michael Rynning, Thu, 31 Jan 91 10:11:54 EST
Re: Character code sets and all that, Keld J|rn Simonsen, Thu, 31 Jan 91 09:58:46 EST
Re: Character code sets and all that, Nathaniel Borenstein, Thu, 31 Jan 91 09:04:46 EST
Re: Re: Character code sets and all that, John C Klensin, Thu, 31 Jan 91 07:24:00 EST
Re: Re: Character code sets and all that, John C Klensin, Thu, 31 Jan 91 06:36:40 EST
Re: Character code sets and all that, Alain FONTAINE (Postmaster - NAD), Thu, 31 Jan 91 03:23:26 EST
Re: Mail Working Group Directions., Mark Crispin, Wed, 30 Jan 91 18:50:26 EST
Re: Mail Working Group Directions., Terry Crowley, Wed, 30 Jan 91 18:01:06 EST
Re: Character code sets and all that, Jan Michael Rynning, Wed, 30 Jan 91 18:00:47 EST
Re: Mail Working Group Directions., Jan Michael Rynning, Wed, 30 Jan 91 17:26:10 EST
Re: Character code sets and all that, Andr'e PIRARD, Wed, 30 Jan 91 14:35:17 EST
Re: Character code sets and all that, Phillip G. Gross, Wed, 30 Jan 91 13:25:14 EST
Godel, Walt Daniels, Wed, 30 Jan 91 12:21:58 EST
Re: Character code sets and all that, Philippe-Andre Prindeville, Wed, 30 Jan 91 11:47:08 EST
Re: Character code sets and all that, Peter Svanberg, Wed, 30 Jan 91 11:44:00 EST
Re: Character code sets and all that, Alain FONTAINE (Postmaster - NAD), Wed, 30 Jan 91 09:43:49 EST
Re: Character code sets and all that, John C Klensin, Wed, 30 Jan 91 09:00:14 EST
Character code sets and all that, Christopher.J.Tanner, Tue, 29 Jan 91 19:50:15 EST
Re: Mail Working Group Directions., Larry Layten 703-644-2307, Tue, 29 Jan 91 19:43:23 EST
Re: Mail Working Group Directions., Mark Crispin, Tue, 29 Jan 91 15:39:58 EST
on mailing binaries, Robert Ullmann, Tue, 29 Jan 91 15:17:26 EST
Re: Mail Working Group Directions., Peter Svanberg, Tue, 29 Jan 91 11:14:48 EST
Re: Mail Working Group Directions., Risto Kankkunen, Tue, 29 Jan 91 10:41:20 EST
Re: Mail Working Group Directions., John C Klensin, Tue, 29 Jan 91 09:38:02 EST
Re: on negotiating ISO8859-1 in SMTP, Risto Kankkunen, Tue, 29 Jan 91 09:36:32 EST
Re: Mail Working Group Directions., Peter Svanberg, Tue, 29 Jan 91 00:06:40 EST
on negotiating ISO8859-1 in SMTP, Robert Ullmann, Mon, 28 Jan 91 22:21:16 EST
Re: Mail Working Group Directions., John C Klensin, Mon, 28 Jan 91 17:04:17 EST
Re: Mail Working Group Directions., Patrik F{ltstr|m, Mon, 28 Jan 91 16:41:24 EST
Mail Working Group Directions., Greg Vaudreuil, Mon, 28 Jan 91 15:39:43 EST
Will extended-SMTP require 8-bit data path?, Risto Kankkunen, Sun, 27 Jan 91 19:13:16 EST
Re: Some of my thoughts and implementation on international mail, John C Klensin, Sun, 27 Jan 91 18:17:33 EST
Some of my thoughts and implementation on international mail, Dan Oscarsson, Sat, 26 Jan 91 06:40:36 EST
subscription to the mailing list, Theresa Chen, Thu, 24 Jan 91 19:27:52 EST
Re: A viewpoint, Nathaniel Borenstein, Tue, 22 Jan 91 16:07:45 EST
A viewpoint, Risto Kankkunen, Tue, 22 Jan 91 14:32:40 EST
Re: SMTP changes stuff, David Paul Zimmerman, Mon, 21 Jan 91 21:29:37 EST
Re: SMTP changes stuff, Rudy.Nedved, Mon, 21 Jan 91 15:52:40 EST
Re: comments on the SMTP session protocol, John C Klensin, Mon, 21 Jan 91 06:02:28 EST
Re: notes on mailing binary objects, Einar Stefferud, Mon, 21 Jan 91 05:26:34 EST
Re: notes on mailing binary objects, Steve Kille, Mon, 21 Jan 91 04:10:31 EST
Re: comments on the SMTP session protocol, Mark Crispin, Sun, 20 Jan 91 22:28:08 EST
Outlines for new functionality, Jan Engvald LDC, Sun, 20 Jan 91 20:21:58 EST
Outlines for new functionality, Jan Engvald LDC, Sun, 20 Jan 91 20:21:55 EST
Re: notes on mailing binary objects, Phillip G. Gross, Sun, 20 Jan 91 14:38:36 EST
Re: notes on mailing binary objects, John C Klensin, Sun, 20 Jan 91 13:22:47 EST
Re: comments on the SMTP session protocol, Einar Stefferud, Sun, 20 Jan 91 10:36:02 EST
Re: notes on mailing binary objects, Phillip G. Gross, Sun, 20 Jan 91 10:09:31 EST
Re: comments on the SMTP session protocol, Ittai Hershman, Sat, 19 Jan 91 19:02:31 EST
Re: comments on the SMTP session protocol, Ittai Hershman, Sat, 19 Jan 91 18:56:58 EST
Re: notes on mailing binary objects, Einar Stefferud, Sat, 19 Jan 91 18:17:58 EST
Re: comments on the SMTP session protocol, Einar Stefferud, Sat, 19 Jan 91 18:16:25 EST
Re: notes on mailing binary objects, Phillip G. Gross, Sat, 19 Jan 91 17:59:14 EST
Re: notes on mailing binary objects, David Ascher, Sat, 19 Jan 91 14:05:48 EST
Re: notes on mailing binary objects, Larry Backman, Sat, 19 Jan 91 06:30:13 EST
Re: SMTP changes stuff, David Herron, Sat, 19 Jan 91 01:25:57 EST
Re: notes on mailing binary objects, Roger Fajman, Fri, 18 Jan 91 19:47:09 EST
re: SMTP changes stuff, Tom Kessler, Fri, 18 Jan 91 18:17:20 EST
Re: notes on mailing binary objects, Terry Crowley, Fri, 18 Jan 91 17:16:31 EST
notes on mailing binary objects, Robert Ullmann, Fri, 18 Jan 91 16:06:06 EST
Re: comments on the SMTP session protocol, Nathaniel Borenstein, Fri, 18 Jan 91 09:31:53 EST
Re: comments on the SMTP session protocol, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Thu, 17 Jan 91 22:43:01 EST
Re: comments on the SMTP session protocol, Rudy.Nedved, Thu, 17 Jan 91 17:57:06 EST
Re: comments on the SMTP session protocol, Ittai Hershman, Thu, 17 Jan 91 16:52:55 EST
Re: comments on the SMTP session protocol, Greg Vaudreuil, Thu, 17 Jan 91 16:32:40 EST
Extension to SMTP., Ole Bj|rn Hessen, Thu, 17 Jan 91 16:17:42 EST
Re: comments on the SMTP session protocol, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Thu, 17 Jan 91 15:53:32 EST
Re: SMTP changes stuff, Mark Crispin, Thu, 17 Jan 91 15:38:41 EST
Re: SMTP changes, Brian Kantor, Thu, 17 Jan 91 15:26:33 EST
A spec on TEX-HEX encoding, Timo Lehtinen, Thu, 17 Jan 91 15:24:07 EST
Extended SMTP., Neil W. Rickert, Thu, 17 Jan 91 14:27:03 EST
Re: SMTP changes stuff, Rudy.Nedved, Thu, 17 Jan 91 14:13:30 EST
Re: comments on the SMTP session protocol, Ole Bj|rn Hessen, Thu, 17 Jan 91 11:47:40 EST
Re: comments on the SMTP session protocol, Nathaniel Borenstein, Thu, 17 Jan 91 11:47:06 EST
comments on the SMTP session protocol, Robert Ullmann, Thu, 17 Jan 91 11:21:33 EST
Re: SMTP changes stuff, Einar Stefferud, Thu, 17 Jan 91 04:55:28 EST
Re: SMTP changes stuff, Mark Crispin, Thu, 17 Jan 91 00:21:08 EST
Re: SMTP changes stuff, Einar Stefferud, Wed, 16 Jan 91 23:55:11 EST
re: SMTP changes stuff, Mark Crispin, Wed, 16 Jan 91 17:41:50 EST
Re: SMTP changes stuff, Einar Stefferud, Wed, 16 Jan 91 17:35:17 EST
Re: SMTP changes stuff, Tom Kessler, Wed, 16 Jan 91 16:41:07 EST
Re: SMTP changes stuff, Greg Vaudreuil, Wed, 16 Jan 91 14:45:55 EST
SMTP changes stuff, Tom Kessler, Wed, 16 Jan 91 13:30:04 EST
RFC1154, Ned Freed, Postmaster, Tue, 15 Jan 91 14:55:54 EST
Welcome and Mail Issues, Greg Vaudreuil, Tue, 15 Jan 91 13:46:33 EST
Re: Minutes of the IETF 8bit meeting, Jan Michael Rynning, Thu, 10 Jan 91 09:53:45 EST
Re: Minutes of the IETF 8bit meeting, Phillip G. Gross, Wed, 2 Jan 91 22:30:59 EST
Re: Minutes of the IETF 8bit meeting, Tom Kessler, Wed, 2 Jan 91 16:25:48 EST
Re: Minutes of the IETF 8bit meeting, Phillip G. Gross, Fri, 28 Dec 90 16:10:51 EST
Minutes of the IETF 8bit meeting, Greg Vaudreuil, Thu, 27 Dec 90 18:16:06 EST

Page 5 of 5
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page] [Last Page]

The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections to this Web page, please send them to phoffman@imc.org.