[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: nsb@thumper.bellcore.com (Nathaniel Borenstein)'s mail
- To: ietf-smtp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: nsb@thumper.bellcore.com (Nathaniel Borenstein)'s mail
- From: Hitoshi Doi <doi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 91 13:37:31 JST
- In-reply-to: Your message of Tue, 26 Feb 91 05:03:24 +0900. <9102252003.AA19169@jrdmax.jrd.dec.com>
- Internet-reply-to: doi@jrd.dec.com
- Phone-reply-to: 045-336-5310 (in Japan)
- Uucp-reply-to: decwrl!jrdmax.enet!doi
# Excerpts from mail: 25-Feb-91 Re: RFC 934 for multipart .. Erik
[..stuff deleted here and there..]
# In the same spirit, I should say that I certainly agree that the issues
# are separable. That is, one could pursue the kind of solution I'm
# advocating quickly in the current 7-bit SMTP world, and simultaneously
# pursue a strategy of upgrading SMTP to permit 8 bit data. I see no
# fundamental conflict here, though I do believe that upgrading SMTP will
# be a much slower process. Basically, I only argue against 8 bit SMTP
I see many people stating that converting to an 8 bit SMTP
will be a slow process. Correct me if I'm wrong, but
I think that people who want an 8 bit SMTP will convert as
soon as possible. I would like to hope that major gateways
would convert quickly too. But the rest of the people don't
need to change as they will probably never see or need 8 bit
text mail.
# because I'm not convinced it is worth the effort, not because I think it
# is intrinsically wrong. I'd certainly be happy to separate the
# arguments, and to give some consideration to how a 7 bit 1049/934
# solution could be designed to gracefully upgrade to use 8 bit SMTP when
# it becomes available. (I.e. we should design it so that there is a
# standard 7 bit encoding for 8 bit data, but also a standard method of
# interpreting 8 bit data if and when the mailers begin to pass it
# through. This might imply something like the use of a Content-Encoding
# header to accompany the Content-type.)
#
# This strikes me as the beginning of a good compromise that might lead to
# a consensus. Other opinions?
How about no conversion at all?
Just let the 7 bit SMTP clients strip the mail.
In most cases, the sender and recepient of 8 bit text mail
are pretty close to each other.
Shouldn't the interpretation of the 8 bit text be left to
the sender and recipient?
Hitoshi Doi, International Systems Engineering doi@jrdmax.jrd.dec.com
Japan Research and Development Center decwrl!jrdmax.enet!doi
Digital Equipment Corporation Japan doi@decvax.dec.com