[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Reviewing philosophies and assumptions
- To: keld@xxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Reviewing philosophies and assumptions
- From: doi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 91 18:45:33 JST
- Cc: ietf-smtp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: Your message of Thu, 28 Feb 91 02:48:32 +0900. <9102271748.AA13334@jrdmax.jrd.dec.com>
- Internet-reply-to: doi@jrd.dec.com
- Phone-reply-to: 045-336-5310 (work)/045-320-0492 (home) [in Japan]
- Uucp-reply-to: decwrl!jrdmax.enet!doi
# > # Or will the current scheme do better (not confuse the state)?
# >
# > Which scheme?
#
# The current Japanese scheme with ISO 2022 shifts which is only 7-bit.
The customers and users of Japanese ULTRIX want 8 bit
sendmail. So we give it to them. I did the 8 bit
sendmail back for J-ULTRIX v3.0 (2 1/2 years ago).
Our sendmail has been 8 bit since then.
I took all of the stripping code out, so it even allows
login names and aliases with 8 bit characters.
(of course that doesn't have to be the case with the
"official" 8 bit SMTP we're discussing here.)
We haven't run into any problems in our environment here.
When somebody mistakenly sends 8 bit text to a non-ULTRIX
unix-like machine (sun, sony, etc..) with a 7 bit sendmail,
the text just gets stripped.
Hitoshi Doi, International Systems Engineering doi@jrdmax.jrd.dec.com
Japan Research and Development Center decwrl!jrdmax.enet!doi
Digital Equipment Corporation Japan doi@decvax.dec.com