[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: user@unqualified



In article <> you write:

[The following is a short excerpt from my much longer reply to John Klensin
 and Hal.  The topic has drifted completely away from the area of this mailing
 list so I hope that if the exchange continues it will be private between the
 three of us.  Anyone wishing a complete copy of my reply can drop me a note.]

>Hal,
>  Thanks.
>  { Aside to Neil:  Please don't tell me I don't understand or care
>about users.  First of all, you are wrong on both counts.  As one small 

  I reread my letter very carefully.  Nowhere do I tell you that you
" don't understand or care about users."  If your copy of my message says
that, then your mailer is making much more serious modifications of messages
than is mine.

>observation, my address says "Department of Architecture", not 
>"Department of Computer Science".  But, more important, it drops what I
>think is an important philosophical discussion--perhaps with the whole
>future of the Internet at stake--to the level of name-calling.  } 

 My copy of the message I sent does not descend to the level of name calling
either.  Your mailer must really be messed up if your copy suggests otherwise.

 -Neil Rickert