[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: user@unqualified
In article <> you write:
[The following is a short excerpt from my much longer reply to John Klensin
and Hal. The topic has drifted completely away from the area of this mailing
list so I hope that if the exchange continues it will be private between the
three of us. Anyone wishing a complete copy of my reply can drop me a note.]
>Hal,
> Thanks.
> { Aside to Neil: Please don't tell me I don't understand or care
>about users. First of all, you are wrong on both counts. As one small
I reread my letter very carefully. Nowhere do I tell you that you
" don't understand or care about users." If your copy of my message says
that, then your mailer is making much more serious modifications of messages
than is mine.
>observation, my address says "Department of Architecture", not
>"Department of Computer Science". But, more important, it drops what I
>think is an important philosophical discussion--perhaps with the whole
>future of the Internet at stake--to the level of name-calling. }
My copy of the message I sent does not descend to the level of name calling
either. Your mailer must really be messed up if your copy suggests otherwise.
-Neil Rickert