[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: I give up Re: admin policies
Hi John -- Sorry to hear you are at the end of a log thin wire again;-).
I guess my only response is that the WG deserves to know more about
what the issues are with the IESG.
That we are in a complete stall with them is news to me.
Also, I take the sense from the WG discussions that only a very few
people have issues, else we should be hearing from more people about
more issues. Traffic is pretty thin, and I somehow doubt that it is
because everyone is waiting for the IESG to drop its other shoe.
Below I have pulled a scan listing of my WG archive since the IESG action.
In 3 parts: SMTP list before (1) and after (2) new drafts, and IETF (3).
Everyone can do their own analysis. Mine is that there are very few
issues outstanding from the WG members, other than the list you have
sent to the IESG, which the list has not yet seen.
I am not clear on why the WG should not see the issue list, if we are
in an open forum. Why are there important matters relating to the WG
that cannot be exposed to the WG? I really don't comprehend this.
Best...\Stef
1 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Scan listing of SMTP WG traffic since 14 August. IETF traffic not included.
IESG action announced at this point (27 messages till new drafts annouced)
23 08/14 20:58EDT John C Klensin Last call on recommendation for 'propos
39 08/15 18:30PDT "Mr. Shannon Yeh" X.400 and MIME<<Just like to let you ge
93 08/18 13:41BST Julian Onions Another thread.<<As a bit of light reli
97 08/18 11:02CDT Neil W Rickert Re: Another thread.<<In article <6107.7
99 08/18 12:57EDT John C Klensin Re: Another thread.<<> It probably wins
101 08/18 12:47CDT Neil W Rickert Re: Another thread.<<on command streami
102 08/18 12:53MDT Jim Knowles Re: last call on smtp-8bittransport<<Hi
104 08/18 15:29CDT Neil W Rickert Re: last call on smtp-8bittransport<<>H
105 08/18 15:40MDT Jim Knowles Re: last call on smtp-8bittransport<<Hi
112 08/19 08:43BST Julian Onions Re: last call on smtp-8bittransport<<>
113 08/19 06:40EDT John C Klensin Re: last call on smtp-8bittransport<<Ju
114 08/19 18:10GMT Allan E Johannese Re: MIME use?<<>>>>> On 19 Aug 92 01:08
117 08/19 14:32CDT Neil W Rickert Re: last call on smtp-8bittransport<<I
119 08/19 22:27+02 Keld J|rn Simonse IANA registration<<Hello! As you may ha
120 08/19 13:37PDT "Mark D. Baushke" Re: last call on smtp-8bittransport<<I
121 08/19 14:01PDT Eliot Lear Re: last call on smtp-8bittransport<<>
122 08/19 14:25PDT Eliot Lear on buffering and sendmail<<Here's a sho
123 M08/19 14:59PDT Ned Freed Re: last call on smtp-8bittransport<<I
124 08/19 20:54EDT KLENSIN@infoods.m EMAL and its definition<<Ok, I think th
126 08/19 21:21CDT Neil Rickert Re: last call on smtp-8bittransport<<In
127 08/19 22:22EDT John C Klensin EMAL (sic) and its definition<<It was g
131 M08/19 23:25-08 Ned Freed Re: last call on smtp-8bittransport<<>
132 08/20 09:03EDT John C Klensin Re: last call on smtp-8bittransport<<>I
135 08/20 16:26EDT Greg Vaudreuil Re: IANA registration<<keld, Unless I a
157 08/26 20:00PDT "Mr. Shannon Yeh" a problem with the POP3 implementation
226 M09/01 17:45EDT IESG Secretary IESG feedback on SMTP Extensions<<After
233 M09/01 19:27EDT John C Klensin Request for instructions and advice on
New drafts announced at this point. (122 messsages since)
255 09/02 00:32PDT Stef New Concise SMTP Extension Specificatio
281 09/03 13:02CDT Neil W Rickert Re: ID ACTION:draft-rose-extensions-00.
285 M09/03 15:02EDT John C Klensin Re: ID ACTION:draft-rose-extensions-00.
287 09/03 14:35CDT Neil W Rickert Re: ID ACTION:draft-rose-extensions-00.
291 M09/03 16:42EDT John C Klensin EMAL reply interpretation and where we
292 M09/03 16:51EDT John C Klensin Comments on new/alternate SMTP ex (Mark
295 09/03 17:17CDT Neil W Rickert Re: EMAL reply interpretation and where
298 09/03 16:45PDT Eliot Lear Re: EMAL reply interpretation and where
301 09/04 08:54BST Julian Onions Comments on the new drafts.<<I have to
304 M09/04 08:51PDT Marshall Rose Re: Comments on the new drafts.<<> SMTP
310 09/04 11:15PDT Eliot Lear Re: Comments on the new drafts.<<did I
311 09/04 14:16EDT jwagner@princeton Re: Comments on the new drafts.<<It str
313 -09/04 14:41EDT jwagner@princeton Single vs Multiple documents<<From John
314 M09/04 13:10PDT Marshall Rose Re: Comments on the new drafts.<<> did
320 09/05 01:14PDT Stef Re: Single vs Multiple documents<<Just
322 09/06 15:35BST Julian Onions Re: Comments on the new drafts.<<> The
323 09/06 21:11PDT Dave Crocker Re: Single vs Multiple documents<<John
324 09/07 12:21EDT Randall Atkinson document number<<It isn't clear to me t
326 09/08 03:14-00 Harald Tveit Alve Problems with SMTP Service Extensions d
327 -09/08 03:53-00 Harald Tveit Alve Problems with the 8-bit cleanliness doc
329 09/08 01:18EDT Keith Moore comments on Administrative Maximum Mess
336 09/08 01:14PDT Eliot Lear The size business<<There are definitely
337 M09/08 07:15PDT Marshall Rose Re: Problems with SMTP Service Extensio
338 09/08 07:34PDT Dave Crocker Re: comments on Administrative Maximum
339 M09/08 07:35PDT Marshall Rose Re: Problems with the 8-bit cleanliness
340 M09/08 07:42PDT Marshall Rose Re: comments on Administrative Maximum
341 M09/08 07:48PDT Marshall Rose Re: The size business<<The problem I ha
343 09/08 15:00-00 Harald Tveit Alve Re: Problems with SMTP Service Extensio
344 09/08 15:42-00 Harald Tveit Alve Re: Problems with the 8-bit cleanliness
346 09/08 10:29PDT Eliot Lear Re: The size business<<I guess I'm inte
347 09/08 14:45EDT Keith Moore Re: comments on Administrative Maximum
348 09/08 15:49EDT Keith Moore Re: comments on Administrative Maximum
352 09/08 14:35PDT Dave Crocker Re: comments on Administrative Maximum
356 09/08 22:58GMT Neil Katin Re: Problems with the 8-bit cleanliness
357 M09/08 16:02PDT Marshall Rose Re: Problems with the 8-bit cleanliness
359 09/08 16:18PDT Stef Re: Problems with SMTP ...<<Recent comm
360 09/08 16:19PDT Dave Crocker Simple simplicity<<A word about philosp
362 09/09 02:16-00 Harald Tveit Alve Simple simplicity<<Dave Crocker writes:
363 09/09 02:21-00 Harald Tveit Alve The cost of being a gateway<<One word a
364 M09/09 00:52EDT Keith Moore SMTP extension to deal with temporary m
365 09/09 01:19EDT Keith Moore Re: comments on Administrative Maximum
366 09/09 01:27EDT Keith Moore Re: comments on Administrative Maximum
367 09/09 05:31-00 Harald Tveit Alve Re: Problems with the 8-bit cleanliness
369 M09/09 03:38EDT John C Klensin The state of things<<Let me inject a fe
370 09/09 09:34BST Julian Onions Re: SMTP extension to deal with tempora
371 M09/09 07:59EDT John C Klensin Re: Problems with the 8-bit cleanliness
373 M09/09 09:59EDT John C Klensin MSGSIZE as extended DATA statement<<Jus
381 09/09 11:58EDT Keith Moore Re: SMTP extension to deal with tempora
383 09/09 09:04PDT Dave Crocker Re: Simple simplicity<<Harald, I think
387 09/09 17:49BST Julian Onions Re: SMTP extension to deal with tempora
388 09/09 09:54PDT David Herron Re: MSGSIZE as extended DATA statement<
389 M09/09 10:14PDT Marshall Rose Re: SMTP extension to deal with tempora
390 09/09 10:16PDT roberts Re: SMTP extension to deal with tempora
391 09/09 10:19PDT roberts Re: comments on Administrative Maximum
392 M09/09 13:42EDT John C Klensin Re: Simple simplicity<<>I think that yo
394 09/09 11:27PDT Dave Crocker Re: SMTP extension to deal with tempora
395 09/09 14:48EDT Valdis Kletnieks Re: SMTP extension to deal with tempora
396 09/09 21:03+02 Keld J|rn Simonse Re: Problems with the 8-bit cleanliness
397 09/09 21:10+02 Keld J|rn Simonse Re: Simple simplicity<<> In making sugg
398 09/09 15:23EDT Keith Moore Re: SMTP extension to deal with tempora
399 09/09 15:27EDT Valdis Kletnieks Re: SMTP extension to deal with tempora
400 09/09 15:46EDT Keith Moore Re: SMTP extension to deal with tempora
401 09/09 13:57PDT Marshall Rose Re: The state of things<<John -- I foun
402 09/09 14:03PDT roberts Re: SMTP extension to deal with tempora
403 M09/09 14:05PDT Ned Freed Re: comments on Administrative Maximum
405 09/09 14:58PDT roberts Re: SMTP extension to deal with tempora
406 09/09 15:37PDT Dave Crocker Bouncing 8-bit mail<<On the question of
408 09/09 17:10PDT "Mr. Shannon Yeh" Re: comments on Administrative Maximum
410 09/09 20:00CDT Neil W Rickert Re: Bouncing 8-bit mail<<In article <92
411 M09/09 18:13PDT Marshall Rose Re: comments on Administrative Maximum
412 09/09 21:56EDT Randall Atkinson 8-bit Conversion<<I think that requirin
413 09/09 22:23EDT Keith Moore Re: Bouncing 8-bit mail<<> To: dcrocker
419 09/09 22:52CDT Neil W Rickert Re: Bouncing 8-bit mail<<>> I would hav
421 09/10 00:09EDT Keith Moore Re: Bouncing 8-bit mail<<> To: Keith Mo
428 M09/10 08:45PDT Marshall Rose New versions of I-Ds submitted<<Based o
429 09/10 12:20CDT Neil W Rickert MSGSIZE<<Quoting your MSGSIZE draft: >
430 09/10 13:27EDT Keith Moore Re: MSGSIZE<<> To: Keith Moore <moore@c
431 09/10 11:35PDT Eliot Lear cloture<<Please, Neil. This 8 bit debat
432 09/10 15:16EDT jwagner@princeton Re: MSGSIZE<<> > What should a receivin
433 M09/10 15:28EDT John C Klensin Re: MSGSIZE<<>If the message exceeds th
434 09/10 20:28GMT Neil Katin Re: Problems with the 8-bit cleanliness
435 M09/10 13:59PDT Ned Freed Re: MSGSIZE<<I agree with John (and thu
436 09/10 17:59EDT Keith Moore Re: MSGSIZE<<My first attempt at the MS
438 09/10 16:08PDT "Mr. Shannon Yeh" Re: comments on Administrative Maximum
439 09/10 18:05PDT "Mr. Shannon Yeh" make the fragmentation feature switchab
441 M09/10 21:21PDT Ned Freed Re: make the fragmentation feature swit
443 09/11 00:37EDT Keith Moore Re: MSGSIZE<<> From: jwagner@princeton.
444 -09/14 16:45EDT jwagner@princeton Re: Problems with the 8-bit cleanliness
447 09/14 16:04PDT Stef Re: Problems with the 8-bit cleanliness
452 09/15 00:53PST Mark Lottor comments on new drafts<<I've reread the
453 M09/15 09:02EDT John C Klensin Re: This message seems to have got lost
454 -09/15 09:18EDT John C Klensin Re: Problems with the 8-bit cleanliness
457 09/15 11:44EDT Keith Moore Re: comments on new drafts<<> Date: Tue
458 09/15 09:14PDT Dave Crocker Re: comments on new drafts<<Mark, You s
461 09/15 10:19PDT Stef Re: Problems with the 8-bit cleanliness
462 M09/15 14:27EDT John C Klensin Re: comments on new drafts<<>inability
463 09/16 03:59-00 Harald Tveit Alve This message seems to have got lost.<<J
464 09/16 04:16-00 Harald Tveit Alve Headers should be 7-bit forever<<recent
468 09/16 11:32PDT Stef Re: This message seems to have got lost
469 M09/16 15:38EDT John C Klensin Re: Headers should be 7-bit forever<<>S
475 -09/16 14:36PST Mark Lottor re: comments on extension drafts<<> Fro
476 M09/16 17:05PDT Marshall Rose Re: comments on extension drafts<<Mark
480 09/16 19:17PDT Stef Re: comments on extension drafts -- AMM
481 09/16 19:42PDT roberts Re: Headers should be 7-bit forever<<Jo
482 M09/16 23:07PDT Marshall Rose Re: AMMS comments<<Mark - it really is
483 -09/16 22:12PST Mark Lottor AMMS comments<<Stef, I was not objectin
485 09/16 23:50PDT Eliot Lear Re: AMMS comments<<Marshall: This sound
487 09/17 02:03PDT Stef Re: AMMS comments<<Marshall said it all
488 09/17 11:00PDT roberts Re: AMMS comments<<Mark Lottor <mkl@nw.
489 09/17 16:20EDT jwagner@princeton Re: AMMS comments<<> Finally, SIZE does
490 09/17 17:15EDT Keith Moore Re: AMMS comments<<> To: ietf-smtp@dima
491 M09/17 14:43PDT Marshall Rose Re: AMMS again<<> First, you need agree
492 -09/17 14:10PST Mark Lottor AMMS again<<OK, I don't want to drag th
493 09/17 16:12PDT Stef Re: AMMS again<<> So, AMMS should alway
494 M09/17 17:55PDT Ned Freed Re: Headers should be 7-bit forever<<>
495 -09/17 19:49PST Mark Lottor admin policies<<> From: Marshall Rose <
496 09/17 21:03PDT "Mr. Shannon Yeh" Policy Based Mail Routing<<Each mail se
497 09/18 00:01PDT Stef I give up Re: admin policies<<Ok Mark -
498 -09/18 11:05EDT John C Klensin Re: I give up Re: admin policies<<Steff
500 09/18 11:17PDT Stef Re: I give up Re: admin policies<<Hi Jo
503 M09/19 09:54EDT John C Klensin Re: I give up Re: admin policies<<Stef,
504 09/19 15:23BST Klensin@infoods.m Re: AMMS again<<Mark Lottor writes: >Fi
2 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 07/28 10:45EDT Frank Kastenholz Re: thoughts on the Boston meeting<<dav
8 M08/12 12:23EDT IESG Secretary Last Call: SMTP Extensions for Transpor
9 08/12 21:46EDT vcerf@nri.reston. Request for Recommendations<<To: IETF C
10 08/13 16:42EDT Robert L Ullmann re last call on smtp-8bittransport<<Hi,
11 08/13 21:40PDT Eva Kuiper Re: re last call on smtp-8bittransport<
12 -08/13 22:01PDT Marshall Rose Re: re last call on smtp-8bittransport<
13 08/14 01:04PST Mark Lottor SMTP Extensions draft -- comments<<Plea
14 08/14 01:04PST Mark Lottor SMTP Extensions draft -- comments<<Plea
15 08/14 07:46EDT John C Klensin Re: re last call on smtp-8bittransport<
16 -08/14 10:41EDT Robert L Ullmann FWD: Re: re last call on smtp-8bittrans
17 -08/14 11:25EDT Jim Cobban re:re last call on smtp-8bittransport<<
18 08/14 09:07PDT Stef Re: re last call on smtp-8bittransport<
19 08/14 13:20EDT Robert L Ullmann re John Klensin's comments<<Hi, While J
20 08/14 14:41EDT William Allen Sim Re: last call on smtp-8bittransport<<I
21 08/14 16:28PDT Craig Partridge re: FWD: Re: re last call on smtp-8bitt
22 08/14 20:47EDT John C Klensin Re: FWD: Re: re last call on smtp-8bitt
24 08/14 21:35EDT Robert L Ullmann <<Hi, I thought I might remind you, my
25 08/14 23:42EDT Robert L Ullmann <<John, [A Fable, Fit the First:] Seems
26 M08/14 20:50PDT Marshall Rose Re: FWD: Re: re last call on smtp-8bitt
27 08/15 00:07EDT "Louis A. Mamakos Re: FWD: Re: re last call on smtp-8bitt
29 08/14 21:54PDT Stef Re: FWD: Re: re last call on smtp-8bitt
31 08/15 00:55PDT Stef Re: re last call on smtp-8bittransport<
33 -08/15 10:35PDT Mark Crispin Re: re last call on smtp-8bittransport<
34 08/15 14:08EDT John C Klensin <<Robert, I'm not going to get into a t
37 M08/15 13:05-08 Ned Freed Re: re last call on smtp-8bittransport<
38 08/15 20:47EDT William Allen Sim Re: last call on smtp-8bittransport<<Ap
41 M08/15 19:48-08 Ned Freed Re: A fable<<I was going to stay out of
51 M08/16 01:22PDT Marshall Rose Re: last call on smtp-8bittransport<<As
52 08/16 23:05+10 Bob Smart Re: last call on smtp-8bittransport<<Fi
56 08/16 15:06EDT John C Klensin Re: last call on smtp-8bittransport<<Bi
63 08/16 17:03CDT Phill Gross Re: re last call on smtp-8bittransport<
64 08/16 15:27PDT Merton Campbell C Re: last call on smtp-8bittransport<<Af
69 M08/16 21:22-08 Ned Freed Re: last call on smtp-8bittransport<<>
72 M08/16 23:17-08 Ned Freed Re: last call on smtp-8bittransport<<I
73 08/17 09:08EDT Dave Piscitello Re: re last call on smtp-8bittransport<
74 08/17 09:47EDT John C Klensin Re: last call on smtp-8bittransport<<Ex
76 08/17 09:37CDT Neil W Rickert Re: last call on smtp-8bittransport<<As
82 08/17 12:06CDT Bob Stewart FWD: Re: re last call on smtp-8bittrans
83 08/17 12:08CDT Bob Stewart Re: re:re last call on smtp-8bittranspo
87 08/18 07:36+07 Hank Nussbacher Re: last call on smtp-8bittransport<<On
90 08/17 23:16MDT Jim Knowles Re: last call on smtp-8bittransport<<Hi
92 08/18 12:32+02 matsb@sics.se Re: FWD: Re: re last call on smtp-8bitt
94 08/18 07:45CDT Neil W Rickert Re: last call on smtp-8bittransport<<>
95 08/18 08:59PDT Dave Crocker SMTP-ext: A matter of process<<The rece
96 08/18 09:01PDT Dave Crocker SMTP-ext: A matter of content<<The rece
100 08/18 10:18PDT Stef Re: last call on smtp-8bittransport<<He
130 M08/20 00:01PDT Marshall Rose Re: Last Call: SMTP Extensions for Tran
133 08/20 09:21EDT Craig Partridge Re: Last Call: SMTP Extensions for Tran
134 08/20 09:35EDT "James B. Van Bok Re: re last call on smtp-8bittransport<
136 08/21 10:08+10 Bob Smart Re: Last Call: SMTP Extensions for Tran
137 08/20 23:01MDT Vernon Schryver Re: re last call on smtp-8bittransport<
138 08/21 10:05EDT Frank Kastenholz Re: Last Call: SMTP Extensions for Tran
139 08/21 15:48EDT "James B. Van Bok Re: re last call on smtp-8bittransport<
140 M08/22 07:54BST Steve Hardcastle- Re: Last Call: SMTP Extensions for Tran
143 08/22 17:09EST klensin@infoods.m SMTP Enhancements and enhanced addresse
147 08/24 10:12MDT Jason Zions Re: re last call on smtp-8bittransport<
290 09/03 12:34PST Mark Lottor Comments on new/alternate SMTP extensio
294 09/03 17:12EDT Frank Kastenholz mail extnsions comments<<how does TURN
297 09/03 17:50CDT Bob Stewart Re: mail extnsions comments<<Arrrrggghh
3 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
IETF List traffic (57 messages) following Last Call on WG draft, on 12 Aug.
8 M08/12 12:23EDT IESG Secretary Last Call: SMTP Extensions for Transpor
10 08/13 16:42EDT Robert L Ullmann re last call on smtp-8bittransport<<Hi,
11 08/13 21:40PDT Eva Kuiper Re: re last call on smtp-8bittransport<
12 -08/13 22:01PDT Marshall Rose Re: re last call on smtp-8bittransport<
13 08/14 01:04PST Mark Lottor SMTP Extensions draft -- comments<<Plea
14 08/14 01:04PST Mark Lottor SMTP Extensions draft -- comments<<Plea
15 08/14 07:46EDT John C Klensin Re: re last call on smtp-8bittransport<
16 -08/14 10:41EDT Robert L Ullmann FWD: Re: re last call on smtp-8bittrans
17 -08/14 11:25EDT Jim Cobban re:re last call on smtp-8bittransport<<
18 08/14 09:07PDT Stef Re: re last call on smtp-8bittransport<
19 08/14 13:20EDT Robert L Ullmann re John Klensin's comments<<Hi, While J
20 08/14 14:41EDT William Allen Sim Re: last call on smtp-8bittransport<<I
21 08/14 16:28PDT Craig Partridge re: FWD: Re: re last call on smtp-8bitt
22 08/14 20:47EDT John C Klensin Re: FWD: Re: re last call on smtp-8bitt
24 08/14 21:35EDT Robert L Ullmann <<Hi, I thought I might remind you, my
25 08/14 23:42EDT Robert L Ullmann <<John, [A Fable, Fit the First:] Seems
26 M08/14 20:50PDT Marshall Rose Re: FWD: Re: re last call on smtp-8bitt
27 08/15 00:07EDT "Louis A. Mamakos Re: FWD: Re: re last call on smtp-8bitt
29 08/14 21:54PDT Stef Re: FWD: Re: re last call on smtp-8bitt
31 08/15 00:55PDT Stef Re: re last call on smtp-8bittransport<
33 -08/15 10:35PDT Mark Crispin Re: re last call on smtp-8bittransport<
34 08/15 14:08EDT John C Klensin <<Robert, I'm not going to get into a t
37 M08/15 13:05-08 Ned Freed Re: re last call on smtp-8bittransport<
38 08/15 20:47EDT William Allen Sim Re: last call on smtp-8bittransport<<Ap
41 M08/15 19:48-08 Ned Freed Re: A fable<<I was going to stay out of
51 M08/16 01:22PDT Marshall Rose Re: last call on smtp-8bittransport<<As
52 08/16 23:05+10 Bob Smart Re: last call on smtp-8bittransport<<Fi
56 08/16 15:06EDT John C Klensin Re: last call on smtp-8bittransport<<Bi
63 08/16 17:03CDT Phill Gross Re: re last call on smtp-8bittransport<
64 08/16 15:27PDT Merton Campbell C Re: last call on smtp-8bittransport<<Af
69 M08/16 21:22-08 Ned Freed Re: last call on smtp-8bittransport<<>
72 M08/16 23:17-08 Ned Freed Re: last call on smtp-8bittransport<<I
73 08/17 09:08EDT Dave Piscitello Re: re last call on smtp-8bittransport<
74 08/17 09:47EDT John C Klensin Re: last call on smtp-8bittransport<<Ex
76 08/17 09:37CDT Neil W Rickert Re: last call on smtp-8bittransport<<As
82 08/17 12:06CDT Bob Stewart FWD: Re: re last call on smtp-8bittrans
83 08/17 12:08CDT Bob Stewart Re: re:re last call on smtp-8bittranspo
87 08/18 07:36+07 Hank Nussbacher Re: last call on smtp-8bittransport<<On
90 08/17 23:16MDT Jim Knowles Re: last call on smtp-8bittransport<<Hi
92 08/18 12:32+02 matsb@sics.se Re: FWD: Re: re last call on smtp-8bitt
94 08/18 07:45CDT Neil W Rickert Re: last call on smtp-8bittransport<<>
95 08/18 08:59PDT Dave Crocker SMTP-ext: A matter of process<<The rece
96 08/18 09:01PDT Dave Crocker SMTP-ext: A matter of content<<The rece
100 08/18 10:18PDT Stef Re: last call on smtp-8bittransport<<He
130 M08/20 00:01PDT Marshall Rose Re: Last Call: SMTP Extensions for Tran
133 08/20 09:21EDT Craig Partridge Re: Last Call: SMTP Extensions for Tran
134 08/20 09:35EDT "James B. Van Bok Re: re last call on smtp-8bittransport<
136 08/21 10:08+10 Bob Smart Re: Last Call: SMTP Extensions for Tran
137 08/20 23:01MDT Vernon Schryver Re: re last call on smtp-8bittransport<
138 08/21 10:05EDT Frank Kastenholz Re: Last Call: SMTP Extensions for Tran
139 08/21 15:48EDT "James B. Van Bok Re: re last call on smtp-8bittransport<
140 M08/22 07:54BST Steve Hardcastle- Re: Last Call: SMTP Extensions for Tran
143 08/22 17:09EST klensin@infoods.m SMTP Enhancements and enhanced addresse
147 08/24 10:12MDT Jason Zions Re: re last call on smtp-8bittransport<
290 09/03 12:34PST Mark Lottor Comments on new/alternate SMTP extensio
294 09/03 17:12EDT Frank Kastenholz mail extnsions comments<<how does TURN
297 09/03 17:50CDT Bob Stewart Re: mail extnsions comments<<Arrrrggghh
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++