Archive of ietf-smtp/old-archive, by thread
Go to date index
Go to main page for ietf-smtp/old-archive
Page 4 of 5
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page]
[Last Page]
- 8 bit mail demonstration list,
Robert Ullmann
- Review and future directions,
Greg Vaudreuil
- RFC-ZZZZ revisions,
John C Klensin
- Minutes of the June 21 meeting,
Greg Vaudreuil
- unsubscribe,
Anders Johansson
- Logistics information for the next meetings.,
Greg Vaudreuil
- Copenhagen logistics,
Greg Vaudreuil
- 8 bit transport (RFC-ZZZZ) clarifications,
John C Klensin
- Sticking out neck: why specify conversions ?,
Paul Svensson
- 8-bit mailboxes, hostnames, and header keywords,
David Robinson
- June 21st meeting,
Greg Vaudreuil
- Comments on 8 bit transport implementation.,
Neil Rickert
- 8 bit routing.,
Neil Rickert
- 8 bit SMTP and conversion.,
Neil Rickert
- PLEASE READ: 8-bit smtp and mail lists,
Greg Vaudreuil
- the format of notifications,
Bob
- 8-bit smtp and mail lists,
K.P.Donnelly
- Guaranteed 8-bit path to conversion machine?,
avi
- Multi-octet SMTP support,
rja7m
- [no subject],
Robert.L.Sargent@stc06.ctd.ornl.gov, 615-481-2168
- Eight bit SMTP and translations,
John C Klensin
- Re: Eight bit SMTP and translations,
Einar Stefferud
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Eight bit SMTP and translations,
Erik M. van der Poel
- Re: Eight bit SMTP and translations,
John M. Wobus
- Re: Eight bit SMTP and translations,
rja7m
- Re: Eight bit SMTP and translations,
Erik M. van der Poel
- Re: Eight bit SMTP and translations,
Erik M. van der Poel
- Re: Eight bit SMTP and translations,
Erik M. van der Poel
- Re: Eight bit SMTP and translations,
Keld J|rn Simonsen
- Re: Eight bit SMTP and translations,
Neil Katin
- Re: Eight bit SMTP and translations,
Erik M. van der Poel
- Re: Eight bit SMTP and translations,
Neil Katin
- Re: Eight bit SMTP and translations,
Ned Freed, Postmaster
- Re: Eight bit SMTP and translations,
Ned Freed, Postmaster
- Port vs Syntax,
Andr'e PIRARD
- SVr4 mail and RFC-XXXX,
t.l.hansen
- the De-facto 8 bit SMTP RFC draft,
Robert Ullmann
- SMTP Protocol Document... Draft 2,
Greg Vaudreuil
- Architecture Document... Draft 1,
Greg Vaudreuil
- 8 bit SMTP documents,
Greg Vaudreuil
- 822/SMTP Meeting: Character Set Concerns,
rja7m
- Their own opinion :-),
Andr'e PIRARD
- SMTP/822 meeting June 21st.,
Greg Vaudreuil
- On encodings : random thoughts....,
David Robinson
- Re: lines, SMTP, ...,
David_Thompson%GN%7cg
- Re: lines, SMTP, ...,
Einar Stefferud
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: lines, SMTP, ...,
jwn2
- Re: lines, SMTP, ...,
David_Thompson%GN%7cg
- Re: lines, SMTP, ...,
isaac
Return Receipts -- POINT OF ORDER,
The TallyMan
Conversion and character set proposals worry me,
Bob
return receipts,
Mark Crispin
re: Please don't dump version numbers.,
David Robinson
8 bit SMTP transport, draft RFC,
John C Klensin
[no subject],
Admin
Re: What's the 'part' in 'multipart'?,
Ned Freed, Postmaster
user@unqualified,
Harold A. Miller
INTERIM WORKING GROUP MEETINGS,
Greg Vaudreuil
A new port should not use smtp, it should use RPC,
Dan Oscarsson
- Re: A new port should not use smtp, it should use RPC,
Keith Moore
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: A new port should not use smtp, it should use RPC,
bob
- Re: A new port should not use smtp, it should use RPC,
Ittai Hershman
- Re: A new port should not use smtp, it should use RPC,
Ned Freed, Postmaster
- Re: A new port should not use smtp, it should use RPC,
Keith Moore
When is extra directory information needed.,
Bob
7-bit codes,
Erik M. van der Poel
What one can tell from an unreachable connection,
David Herron
Strawman proposal,
Bob
New port not needed!! And other matters.,
Bob
a model?,
bob
question about the new port,
Mark Crispin
- Re: question about the new port,
Bob
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: question about the new port,
Risto Kankkunen
- Re: question about the new port,
Risto Kankkunen
- Re: question about the new port,
Erik M. van der Poel
- Re: question about the new port,
Erik M. van der Poel
- Re: question about the new port,
David Herron
- Re: question about the new port,
Neil Katin
- Re: question about the new port,
Erik M. van der Poel
- Re: question about the new port,
jwn2
- Re: question about the new port,
leo j mclaughlin iii
Please: a solution to help the most people,
Bob
Re: RFC-87gtwys (was: smtp charter (revised) ),
Dean D. Throop
Re: IETF SMTP group is heading in the right direction. From: Bob <smart@mel.dit.csiro.au> Content-Length: 4249 X-Lines: 91 If you have an 8 bit message you will have to send it to 7 bit MTAs sometimes.,
Glenn Wright - Sun EHQ - Mktg
IETF SMTP group is heading in the right direction.,
Bob
FYI: a message handling system is available,
Shannon Yeh
Re: smtp charter (revised),
leo j mclaughlin iii
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: smtp charter (revised),
Ittai Hershman
- Re: smtp charter (revised),
Ittai Hershman
- Re: smtp charter (revised),
Ned Freed, Postmaster
- Re: smtp charter (revised),
Ned Freed, Postmaster
- Re: smtp charter (revised),
Einar Stefferud
- Re: smtp charter (revised),
Ittai Hershman
- Re: smtp charter (revised),
Risto Kankkunen
- Re: smtp charter (revised),
Keld J|rn Simonsen
- Re: smtp charter (revised),
Andr'e PIRARD
- Re: smtp charter (revised),
Erik M. van der Poel
- Re: smtp charter (revised),
Erik M. van der Poel
smtp charter (reviesd),
Greg Vaudreuil
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: smtp charter (reviesd),
Dean D. Throop
- Re: smtp charter (reviesd),
leo j mclaughlin iii
- Re: smtp charter (reviesd),
Neil Katin
- Re: smtp charter (reviesd),
Ittai Hershman
- Re: smtp charter (revised),
Einar Stefferud
- Re: smtp charter (revised),
John C Klensin
- Re: smtp charter (revised),
Dave Crocker
- Re: smtp charter (revised),
Einar Stefferud
- Re: smtp charter (revised),
John C Klensin
- Re: smtp charter (revised),
Einar Stefferud
- Re: smtp charter (revised),
Mark Crispin
- Re: smtp charter (revised),
Paul A Vixie
- Re: smtp charter (revised),
Mark Crispin
- Re: smtp charter (revised),
David Herron
- DATA and CRLF.CRLF (was: smtp charter (revised) ),
tep
- Re: smtp charter (reviesd),
Keld J|rn Simonsen
ietf-smtp charter,
Greg Vaudreuil
Proposed charter for the SMTP sub-group,
Greg Vaudreuil
Why We Disagree So Much... A Thought,
David Robinson
Re: Compression, and nested encodings,
Anders.Klemets
ISO 2022 in SMTP,
Erik M. van der Poel
Swahili,
Erik M. van der Poel
Re: Closing connection,
Risto Kankkunen
universal character sets,
Mark Crispin
Closing connection (was: Re: Another look at 8 bit transport for...),
Risto Kankkunen
Inline excerpts (was: Re: Another look at 8 bit transport for...),
Risto Kankkunen
mail owner-ietf-smtp@dimacs.rutgers.edu,
Glenn P. Wright
new 822 list is alive!,
David Paul Zimmerman
Nit-pick 822,
Dave Crocker
ISO2022 revisited, and related issues,
John C Klensin
ietf-822-request,
Mark H. Needleman
Spitting the Mailing list.,
Greg Vaudreuil
Separating the 821 and 822 work,
Steve Kille
How much does an MTA know?,
Michael Stein
Some thoughts on 8-bit text SMTP,
Risto Kankkunen
Re: Amuricans and the eighth bit,
Ned Freed, Postmaster
[K.P.Donnelly@edinburgh.ac.uk: 8 bits],
David Paul Zimmerman
Another look at 8 bit transport for local mail,
John C Klensin
- Re: Another look at 8 bit transport for local mail,
Nathaniel Borenstein
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Another look at 8 bit transport for local mail,
Erik M. van der Poel
- Re: Another look at 8 bit transport for local mail,
Keld J|rn Simonsen
- Re: Another look at 8 bit transport for local mail,
Keld J|rn Simonsen
- Re: Another look at 8 bit transport for local mail,
Keld J|rn Simonsen
- Re: Another look at 8 bit transport for local mail,
Erik M. van der Poel
- Re: Another look at 8 bit transport for local mail,
Risto Kankkunen
- Re: Another look at 8 bit transport for local mail,
Erik M. van der Poel
- Re: Another look at 8 bit transport for local mail,
Erik M. van der Poel
- Re: Another look at 8 bit transport for local mail,
Erik M. van der Poel
- Re: Another look at 8 bit transport for local mail,
Erik M. van der Poel
"prefix" area in multipart message,
Vincent Lau
Better Headers,
Nathaniel Borenstein
5 ideas for the next draft,
Nathaniel Borenstein
Proposal for how to divide multipart messages,
Greg Vaudreuil
Alvestrand on Dashes,
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Suggested Requirements for Multi-part Multi-Structured 822 Encoding,
David Robinson
- Re: Suggested Requirements for Multi-part Multi-Structured 822 Encoding,
Dave Crocker
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Suggested Requirements for Multi-part Multi-Structured 822 Encoding,
Ned Freed, Postmaster
- Re: Suggested Requirements for Multi-part Multi-Structured 822 Encoding,
Ned Freed, Postmaster
- Re: Suggested Requirements for Multi-part Multi-Structured 822 Encoding,
Ned Freed, Postmaster
- Re: Suggested Requirements for Multi-part Multi-Structured 822 Encoding,
Ned Freed, Postmaster
- Re: Suggested Requirements for Multi-part Multi-Structured 822 Encoding,
Vincent Lau
Re: CDC Multimedia/Multipart extensions,
David Robinson
Multimedia/Multipart extensions to RFC987,
David Herron
Is it reasonable?,
Andr'e PIRARD
- Re: Is it reasonable?,
Nathaniel Borenstein
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Is it reasonable?,
Risto Kankkunen
- Re: Is it reasonable?,
Andr'e PIRARD
- Re: Is it reasonable?,
Ned Freed, Postmaster
- Re: Is it reasonable?,
Ned Freed, Postmaster
- Re: Is it reasonable?,
Risto Kankkunen
- Re: Is it reasonable?,
Risto Kankkunen
- Re: Is it reasonable?,
Risto Kankkunen
- Re: Is it reasonable?,
Risto Kankkunen
Re: RFC-XXXX Boundary Marking,
David Robinson
The Wretched solution (was Re: Lastest drfat of RFC-XXXX),
Risto Kankkunen
Lastest drfat of RFC-XXXX,
Nathaniel Borenstein
- Re: Lastest drfat of RFC-XXXX,
Craig_Everhart
- Re: Lastest drfat of RFC-XXXX,
Neil Rickert
- Re: Lastest drfat of RFC-XXXX,
Paul A Vixie
- Re: Lastest drfat of RFC-XXXX,
Einar Stefferud
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Lastest drfat of RFC-XXXX,
Greg Vaudreuil
- Re: Lastest drfat of RFC-XXXX,
Risto Kankkunen
- Re: Lastest drfat of RFC-XXXX,
Dean D. Throop
- Re: Lastest drfat of RFC-XXXX,
Risto Kankkunen
- Re: Lastest drfat of RFC-XXXX,
Risto Kankkunen
- Re: Lastest drfat of RFC-XXXX,
Risto Kankkunen
- RE: Lastest drfat of RFC-XXXX,
Risto Kankkunen
- Re: Lastest drfat of RFC-XXXX,
Greg Vaudreuil
- Re: Lastest drfat of RFC-XXXX,
Risto Kankkunen
- Re: Lastest drfat of RFC-XXXX,
Risto Kankkunen
- Re: Lastest drfat of RFC-XXXX,
Risto Kankkunen
- Re: Lastest drfat of RFC-XXXX,
Keld J|rn Simonsen
Writing course,
Neil Katin
Minutes of the SMTP meeting in St. Louis,
Greg Vaudreuil
More on UA configuration (RFC-YYYY),
Nathaniel Borenstein
Forwarded X.400 meeting notes,
Ittai Hershman
10646 vs. unicode,
Doug Merritt
New TEXT-HEX draft RFC,
Jan Michael Rynning
CDs in the mail,
Robert Ullmann
RFC-nnnn - Bodypart Encapsulation and Representation of Encoded Information Types,
Timo Lehtinen
Yet another proposal for Multi-Part Message Format,
Vincent Lau
Subject: Re: the rest of the free world ...,
Dave Crocker
RFC-YYY: Multimedia Mail Configuration Mechanism,
Nathaniel Borenstein
re John Klensin notes,
Robert Ullmann
RFC-XXX: Multipart Content Type and Encoding Mechanism,
Nathaniel Borenstein
RFCS to read on the airplane,
Nathaniel Borenstein
yet more on 8 bit ...,
Robert Ullmann
the rest of the free world ...,
Robert Ullmann
8-bit draft,
Robert Ullmann
draft on mnemonic encoding,
Keld J|rn Simonsen
TEXT-HEX,
David Paul Zimmerman
How IBM does it,
Andr'e PIRARD
The peace proposal--two more orthogonal sets of categories,
John C Klensin
"Smart" and "dumb" 8-bit mailers,
David Robinson
Re: Whether 8-bit SMTP? And how?,
Risto Kankkunen
A Formal Peace Proposal,
Nathaniel Borenstein
Re: Responsive vendors and their implications (was de-facto 8 bit,
Alain FONTAINE (Postmaster - NAD)
Whether 8-bit SMTP? And how?,
moore
Page 4 of 5
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page]
[Last Page]
The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail
Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections
to this Web page, please send them to
phoffman@imc.org.