Archive of ietf-submit, by thread

• Manhunt for train fire suspects, ietf-announce
• Re: important, robert . zuccherato
• Small addition to draft-gellens-submit-bis-02.txt, willemien
  • Re: Small addition to draft-gellens-submit-bis-02.txt, Tony Finch
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Re: Small addition to draft-gellens-submit-bis-02.txt, willemien
    • Re: Re: Small addition to draft-gellens-submit-bis-02.txt, Tony Finch
  • Re: Re: Small addition to draft-gellens-submit-bis-02.txt, willemien
• Out of Office AutoReply: hello, Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)
• How one can become a terrorist?, mundy
• Re: The job of an MSA, Bruce Lilly
  • Re: The job of an MSA, ned . freed
• [Fwd: MSAs (RFC 2476), RFC 2822, and the Date field], Bruce Lilly
• Update to RFC 2476, Randall Gellens
  • Message not available
    • Re: Update to RFC 2476, Dave Crocker
• AUSLAENDERGEWALT BEIM HAFENGEBURTSTAG [4570], ned . freed
• is this the right venue, Dave Crocker
  • Re: is this the right venue, Tony Hansen
• Hello, daboo
• Status, cmadson
  • RE: Status, Shawn Fessenden
  • RE: Status, Shawn Fessenden
• Update to Submit RFC, Chris Newman
  • Re: Update to Submit RFC, Eric Allman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Update to Submit RFC, Vaudreuil, Greg M (Greg)
    • Re: Update to Submit RFC, Chris Newman
      • Message not available
      • Re: Update to Submit RFC, Dave Crocker
      • Re: Update to Submit RFC, Chris Newman
      • Message not available
      • Re: Update to Submit RFC, Dave Crocker
• [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-hall-submit-srv-00.txt], Eric A. Hall
• Business/Employment Opportunity, Mitchell
• D maga, DMT管理者
• RE; THANK YOU, bk12bk27
• Improve your stepfamily life, hj4hj6
• 1+1=2, hjghjgjh
• Holiday Special: Don't miss the savings!, bn1bn2
• Software Development from Russia! ($15-$20 per hour), mdnhsfjkytuhj1
• Earn $50,000 in 90 Days! It Really Works! It worked so well the first time, I'm doing it again!, sst
• Truly Earn $50,000 in 90 Days! It Works!, paul
• FlowerFunds - Fund Raising Program, sfaquestions
• Port 587 = Useless. Was: Port 587 = Spammer Friendly?, Vladimir Butenko, Stalker Software, Inc.
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Port 587 = Useless. Was: Port 587 = Spammer Friendly?, Chris Newman
    • Re: Port 587 = Useless. Was: Port 587 = Spammer Friendly?, Vladimir Butenko, Stalker Software, Inc.
      • Re: Port 587 = Useless. Was: Port 587 = Spammer Friendly?, Chris Newman
      • Re: Port 587 = Useless. Was: Port 587 = Spammer Friendly?, D. J. Bernstein
      • Re: Port 587 = Useless. Was: Port 587 = Spammer Friendly?, Vladimir Butenko, Stalker Software, Inc.
      • Re: Port 587 = Useless. Was: Port 587 = Spammer Friendly?, D. J. Bernstein
      • Re: Port 587 = Useless. Was: Port 587 = Spammer Friendly?, Vladimir Butenko, Stalker Software, Inc.
      • Re: Port 587 = Useless. Was: Port 587 = Spammer Friendly?, Randall Gellens
      • Re: Port 587 = Useless. Was: Port 587 = Spammer Friendly?, Randall Gellens
      • Re: Port 587 = Useless. Was: Port 587 = Spammer Friendly?, Vladimir Butenko, Stalker Software, Inc.
• Port 587 = Spammer Friendly?, Lorin Sutton
  • Re: Port 587 = Spammer Friendly?, ned . freed
  • Re: Port 587 = Spammer Friendly?, Chris Newman
  • Re: Port 587 = Spammer Friendly?, Robert A. Rosenberg
    • Re: Port 587 = Spammer Friendly?, Dan Wing
    • Re: Port 587 = Spammer Friendly?, Chris Newman
• Wealth at once!!, Winning
• Missing Links, searchers
• Query - RFC2476 interaction with POP3 XTND XMIT, Robert A. Rosenberg
  • Re: Query - RFC2476 interaction with POP3 XTND XMIT, Randall Gellens
• Submit Server Discovery extension, Alexey Melnikov
  • Re: Submit Server Discovery extension, Dan Wing
    • Re: Submit Server Discovery extension, Alexey Melnikov
      • Re: Submit Server Discovery extension, Dan Wing
      • Re: Submit Server Discovery extension, Alexey Melnikov
      • Re: Submit Server Discovery extension, Randall Gellens
• How to be removed from this list, List Manager of ietf-submit
• ISM Corp has acquired 4.7 mill to begin production Stock up 100 percent, scj2
• Straw poll on submit draft, Chris Newman
  • Re: Straw poll on submit draft, Chris Newman
  • Re: Straw poll on submit draft, Mohsen BANAN
  • Now: Questions about the Straw poll Questions -- Was: Re: Straw poll on submit draft, Mohsen BANAN
    • Re: Now: Questions about the Straw poll Questions -- Was: Re: Straw poll on submit draft, Chris Newman
    • Re: Now: Questions about the Straw poll Questions -- Was: Re: Straw poll on submit draft, Randall Gellens
      • Re: Now: Questions about the Straw poll Questions -- Was: Re:Straw poll on submit draft, Alexey Melnikov
      • Re: Now: Questions about the Straw poll Questions -- Was: Re:Straw poll on submit draft, Eliot Lear
      • Re: Now: Questions about the Straw poll Questions -- Was: Re:Straw poll on submit draft, Randall Gellens
• mailrev BOF, Chris Newman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Mailrev BOF, D. J. Bernstein
• draft-gellens-submit-10.txt, Randall Gellens
  • Re: draft-gellens-submit-10.txt, D. J. Bernstein
• draft-gellens-submit-09.txt, Randall Gellens
  • Re: draft-gellens-submit-09.txt, Randall Gellens
  • Re: draft-gellens-submit-09.txt, D. J. Bernstein
• OFMIP, D. J. Bernstein
  • Re: OFMIP, Eliot Lear
• Submit comments, Vaudreuil, Greg M (Greg)
  • Re: Submit comments, Randall Gellens
• Authorization Mechanisms, Randall Gellens
  • Re: Authorization Mechanisms, Ned Freed
  • Re: Authorization Mechanisms, Chris Newman
    • draft-gellens-submit-08.txt, Randall Gellens
      • Re: draft-gellens-submit-08.txt, Eliot Lear
      • Re: draft-gellens-submit-08.txt, Randall Gellens
      • submit-08 flaws, D. J. Bernstein
      • Re: submit-08 flaws, Randall Gellens
      • Re: submit-08 flaws, D. J. Bernstein
      • Re: submit-08 flaws, Eliot Lear
      • Re: submit-08 flaws, D. J. Bernstein
• submit-07 flaws, D. J. Bernstein
  • Re: submit-07 flaws, Bart Schaefer
• New version of the draft available, Paul Hoffman / IMC
• AD response to: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission, Keith Moore
  • Re: AD response to: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission, Chris Newman
• FAQ: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, Chris Newman
  • Re: FAQ: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, Perry E. Metzger
    • Re: FAQ: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker
    • Re: FAQ: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, Chris Newman
      • Re: FAQ: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, Perry E. Metzger
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: FAQ: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, D. J. Bernstein
• [no subject], D. J. Bernstein
• Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, The IESG
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, Mohsen Banan
    • Re: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, Tim Goodwin
      • Re: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, Mohsen Banan
    • Re: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, Randall Gellens
      • Re: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, Mohsen Banan
      • Re: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, D. J. Bernstein
      • Message not available
      • Re: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, Randall Gellens
  • RE: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, Chris Newman
    • RE: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, Mohsen Banan
      • RE: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, Jack De Winter
      • RE: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, Randall Gellens
      • Re: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, Kai Henningsen
      • Re: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, D. J. Bernstein
      • Re: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, Jack De Winter
      • Re: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, Perry E. Metzger
      • Re: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker
      • Re: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, Lyndon Nerenberg
      • Re: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker
      • Re: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, Perry E. Metzger
      • Re: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker
      • Re: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, Perry E. Metzger
      • Re: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker
      • Re: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, Jack De Winter
      • Re: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, D. J. Bernstein
      • Re: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, Jack De Winter
      • Re: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, Jack De Winter
      • Huffman coding?, Harald Alvestrand
  • RE: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, Vaudreuil, Greg
    • RE: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, Chris Newman
      • Re: RE: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, Lyndon Nerenberg
      • Re: RE: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, Chris Newman
      • Re: RE: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, Jack De Winter
      • Re: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, Kai Henningsen
      • Re: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, D. J. Bernstein
  • RE: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, Woodhouse, Gregory J.
  • Re: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, Jeff Stephenson
    • Re: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, Robert Elz
      • Re: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, Brian McMahon
      • Re: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, Robert Elz
      • Re: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, Brian McMahon
      • Re: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, Robert Elz
      • Re: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, Marc Horowitz
      • Re: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, Robert Elz
      • Re: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, Marc Horowitz
  • RE: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, Vaudreuil, Greg
    • RE: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, Randall Gellens
    • RE: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, Chris Newman
      • Re: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, D. J. Bernstein
  • Re: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, William Allen Simpson
    • Re: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, Tim Goodwin
  • Re: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, William Allen Simpson
    • Re: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, D. J. Bernstein
  • Re: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, William Allen Simpson
    • Re: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker
      • Re: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, Craig Partridge
      • Re: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker
  • RE: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, Woodhouse, Gregory J.
    • Re: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard, Perry E. Metzger
• Introduce Your Website To the World!, 5OWt376Ag
• OK to send e-mail?, owl
• Straw poll results, Tim Goodwin
• Straw poll on `Change-History:', Tim Goodwin
  • Re: Straw poll on `Change-History:', Dave Crocker
    • Re: Straw poll on `Change-History:', Randall Gellens
    • Re: Straw poll on `Change-History:', Chris Newman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Straw poll on `Change-History:', D. J. Bernstein
  • Re: Straw poll on `Change-History:', D. J. Bernstein
• Re: Regression of draft, D. J. Bernstein
  • Re: Regression of draft, Randall Gellens
  • Re: Regression of draft, Kai Henningsen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Regression of draft, D. J. Bernstein
    • Re: Regression of draft, Keith Moore
      • Re: Regression of draft, Dave Crocker
      • Re: Regression of draft, Dave Crocker
  • Re: Regression of draft, D. J. Bernstein
    • Re: Regression of draft, Dave Crocker
    • Re: Regression of draft, Keith Moore
  • Re: Regression of draft, D. J. Bernstein
    • Re: Regression of draft, Jack De Winter
• Version -05, Randall Gellens
  • Re: Version -05, Paul E. Hoffman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Version -05, D. J. Bernstein
• relay=25 / submit=!25, Dave Crocker
  • Re: relay=25 / submit=!25, Randall Gellens
    • Re: relay=25 / submit=!25, Dave Crocker
      • Re: relay=25 / submit=!25, Randall Gellens
      • Re: relay=25 / submit=!25, Dave Crocker
      • Re: relay=25 / submit=!25, John Gardiner Myers
      • Re: relay=25 / submit=!25, Kai Henningsen
      • Re: relay=25 / submit=!25, John Gardiner Myers
      • Re: relay=25 / submit=!25, Kai Henningsen
      • Re: relay=25 / submit=!25, Randall Gellens
      • Re: relay=25 / submit=!25, Keith Moore
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: relay=25 / submit=!25, D. J. Bernstein
• Advancement of Draft, Randall Gellens
  • Re: Advancement of Draft, John Gardiner Myers
    • Re: Advancement of Draft, Randall Gellens
      • Re: Advancement of Draft, John Gardiner Myers
  • Re: Advancement of Draft, Dave Crocker
  • Re: Advancement of Draft, Tim Goodwin
    • Re: Advancement of Draft, Chris Newman
      • Re: Advancement of Draft, Tim Goodwin
    • Re: Advancement of Draft, Randall Gellens
    • Re: Advancement of Draft, Randall Gellens
    • Re: Advancement of Draft, Randall Gellens
      • Re: Advancement of Draft, Tim Goodwin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Advancement of Draft, D. J. Bernstein
    • Re: Advancement of Draft, Randall Gellens
      • Re: Advancement of Draft, Randall Gellens
  • RE: Advancement of Draft, Jeff Stephenson (Exchange)
    • Re: Advancement of Draft, John Gardiner Myers
  • Re: Advancement of Draft, D. J. Bernstein
  • RE: Advancement of Draft, Jeff Stephenson (Exchange)
    • RE: Advancement of Draft, Dave Crocker
    • Re: Advancement of Draft, Kai Henningsen
    • RE: Advancement of Draft, Chris Newman
  • RE: Advancement of Draft, D. J. Bernstein
  • RE: Advancement of Draft, Jeff Stephenson (Exchange)
    • RE: Advancement of Draft, Randall Gellens
  • Re: Advancement of Draft, D. J. Bernstein
    • Re: Advancement of Draft, Keith Moore
  • Re: Advancement of Draft, D. J. Bernstein
  • Re: Advancement of Draft, D. J. Bernstein
  • Re: Advancement of Draft, D. J. Bernstein
    • Re: Advancement of Draft, Einar Stefferud
  • Re: Advancement of Draft, D. J. Bernstein
    • Re: Advancement of Draft, Einar Stefferud
  • Re: Advancement of Draft, D. J. Bernstein
• Comments on the Submit draft, Jeff Stephenson (Exchange)
  • Re: Comments on the Submit draft, Ned Freed
    • Re: Comments on the Submit draft, Randall Gellens
      • Re: Comments on the Submit draft, Einar Stefferud
      • Re: Comments on the Submit draft, Randall Gellens
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Comments on the Submit draft, D. J. Bernstein
    • Re: Comments on the Submit draft, Keith Moore
      • Re: Comments on the Submit draft, Randall Gellens
      • Re: Comments on the Submit draft, Keith Moore
      • Re: Comments on the Submit draft, Ned Freed
      • Re: Comments on the Submit draft, John Gardiner Myers
      • Re: Comments on the Submit draft, Jack De Winter
      • Re: Comments on the Submit draft, John Gardiner Myers
      • Re: Comments on the Submit draft, Randall Gellens
      • Re: Comments on the Submit draft, John Gardiner Myers
      • Re: Comments on the Submit draft, Randall Gellens
      • Re: Comments on the Submit draft, John Gardiner Myers
      • Re: Comments on the Submit draft, Randall Gellens
      • Re: Comments on the Submit draft, John Gardiner Myers
      • Re: Comments on the Submit draft, Randall Gellens
      • Re: Comments on the Submit draft, Randall Gellens
  • Re: Comments on the Submit draft, D. J. Bernstein
    • Re: Comments on the Submit draft, Randall Gellens
  • Re: Comments on the Submit draft, D. J. Bernstein
• Note: Submit BOF was *Unofficial*, Randall Gellens
• Summary of Submit BOF, Randall Gellens
• Updated Submit Draft (-04), Randall Gellens
• Updated Submit Draft, Randall Gellens
• Easy deployment vs. Correctness, Chris Newman
  • Re: Easy deployment vs. Correctness, Randall Gellens
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Easy deployment vs. Correctness, Jack De Winter
  • Re: Easy deployment vs. Correctness, D. J. Bernstein
    • Re: Easy deployment vs. Correctness, Christian Kuhtz
  • Re: Easy deployment vs. Correctness, D. J. Bernstein
• ``problem'', D. J. Bernstein
  • Re: ``problem'', Keith Moore
  • Re: ``problem'', Randall Gellens
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: ``problem'', D. J. Bernstein
    • Re: ``problem'', Keith Moore
  • Re: ``problem'', D. J. Bernstein
  • Re: ``problem'', D. J. Bernstein
    • Re: ``problem'', Keith Moore
  • Re: ``problem'', D. J. Bernstein
• Re: Keith's proposals, D. J. Bernstein
  • Re: Keith's proposals, Keith Moore
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Keith's proposals, D. J. Bernstein
• domain qualification, D. J. Bernstein
  • Re: domain qualification, Keith Moore
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: domain qualification, D. J. Bernstein
• port fallback, D. J. Bernstein
  • Re: port fallback, Keith Moore
• date creation, D. J. Bernstein
  • Re: date creation, Keith Moore
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: date creation, D. J. Bernstein
    • Re: date creation, Keith Moore
    • Re: date creation, Christian Kuhtz
      • Re: date creation, Chris Newman
      • Re: date creation, Kai Henningsen
• ``guessing'', D. J. Bernstein
  • Re: ``guessing'', Keith Moore
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: ``guessing'', D. J. Bernstein
    • Re: ``guessing'', Keith Moore
  • Re: ``guessing'', D. J. Bernstein
• Re: Heading toward agreement?, Jack De Winter
  • Re: Heading toward agreement?, Christian Kuhtz
    • Re: Heading toward agreement?, Ned Freed
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Heading toward agreement?, D. J. Bernstein
    • Re: Heading toward agreement?, Keith Moore
• Re: Bad fixes (was Re: virtual hosting), Jack De Winter
  • Re: Bad fixes (was Re: virtual hosting), Chris Newman
    • Heading toward agreement?, Paul E. Hoffman
      • Re: Heading toward agreement?, Philip Hazel
      • Re: Heading toward agreement?, Paul E. Hoffman
      • Re: Heading toward agreement?, Philip Hazel
      • Re: Heading toward agreement?, Ned Freed
      • Re: Noting Changes (Was: Heading toward agreement?), Randall Gellens
      • Re: Noting Changes (Was: Heading toward agreement?), Ned Freed
      • Re: Noting Changes (Was: Heading toward agreement?), Randall Gellens
      • Re: Noting Changes (Was: Heading toward agreement?), Ned Freed
      • Re: Noting Changes (Was: Heading toward agreement?), Keith Moore
      • Re: Noting Changes (Was: Heading toward agreement?), Ned Freed
      • Re: Noting Changes (Was: Heading toward agreement?), Gregory J. Woodhouse
      • Re: Noting Changes (Was: Heading toward agreement?), Keith Moore
      • Re: Noting Changes (Was: Heading toward agreement?), Ned Freed
      • Re: Noting Changes (Was: Heading toward agreement?), Keith Moore
      • Re: Heading toward agreement?, Keith Moore
      • Re: Heading toward agreement?, Philip Hazel
      • Re: Heading toward agreement?, Keith Moore
      • Re: Heading toward agreement?, Philip Hazel
      • Re: Heading toward agreement?, Keith Moore
      • Re: Heading toward agreement?, Philip Hazel
      • Re: Heading toward agreement?, Ned Freed
      • Re: Heading toward agreement?, Randall Gellens
      • Re: Heading toward agreement?, Keith Moore
      • Re: Heading toward agreement?, Ned Freed
  • Re: Bad fixes (was Re: virtual hosting), Keith Moore
• virtual hosting, Gregory J. Woodhouse
  • Re: virtual hosting, Randall Gellens
  • Re: virtual hosting, Keith Moore
    • Re: virtual hosting, Kai Henningsen
      • Re: virtual hosting, Keith Moore
      • Re: virtual hosting, Chris Newman
      • Re: virtual hosting, Mark Crispin
      • Re: virtual hosting, Philip Hazel
      • Re: virtual hosting, Kai Henningsen
      • submit address format (was Re: virtual hosting), Chris Newman
      • Re: virtual hosting, Ned Freed
      • Re: virtual hosting, Randall Gellens
      • Re: virtual hosting, Keith Moore
      • Re: virtual hosting, Philip Hazel
      • Re: virtual hosting, Ned Freed
      • Re: virtual hosting, Keith Moore
      • Bad fixes (was Re: virtual hosting), Chris Newman
      • Re: virtual hosting, Keith Moore
      • Re: virtual hosting, Randall Gellens
      • Re: virtual hosting, Ned Freed
      • Re: virtual hosting, Keith Moore
      • Re: virtual hosting, Ned Freed
      • Re: virtual hosting, Keith Moore
      • Re: virtual hosting, Christian Kuhtz
      • Re: virtual hosting, Keith Moore
      • Re: virtual hosting, Kai Henningsen
      • Re: virtual hosting, Ned Freed
      • Re: virtual hosting, Kai Henningsen
      • Re: virtual hosting, Ned Freed
      • Re: virtual hosting, Kai Henningsen
      • Re: virtual hosting, Ned Freed
      • Re: virtual hosting, Philip Hazel
      • Re: virtual hosting, Keith Moore
      • Re: virtual hosting, Randall Gellens
      • Re: virtual hosting, Keith Moore
      • Re: virtual hosting, Kai Henningsen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: virtual hosting, Jack De Winter
    • Re: virtual hosting, Gregory J. Woodhouse
  • Re: virtual hosting, Jack De Winter
    • Re: virtual hosting, Randall Gellens
    • Re: virtual hosting, Kai Henningsen
  • Re: virtual hosting, Jack De Winter
    • rationale for submission service, John Gardiner Myers
      • Re: rationale for submission service, Keith Moore
      • Re: rationale for submission service, Randall Gellens
      • Re: rationale for submission service, John Gardiner Myers
      • Re: rationale for submission service, Keith Moore
      • Re: rationale for submission service, Randall Gellens
      • Re: rationale for submission service, Ned Freed
  • Re: virtual hosting, Jack De Winter
  • Re: virtual hosting, Jack De Winter
• Re: Separate submission port, Jack De Winter
  • Re: Separate submission port, John Gardiner Myers
    • Re: Separate submission port, Keith Moore
• Re:, Jack De Winter
  • Separate submission port, Tim Goodwin
• Re: (response to message of Fri, 10 Jan 1997 00:09:59 -0800 (PST)), Nat Ballou
  • Re: (response to message of Fri, 10 Jan 1997 00:09:59 -0800 (PST)), Mark Crispin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: (response to message of Fri, 10 Jan 1997 00:09:59 -0800 (PST)), Nat Ballou
    • Re: (response to message of Fri, 10 Jan 1997 00:09:59 -0800 (PST)), Keith Moore
      • Re: (response to message of Fri, 10 Jan 1997 00:09:59 -0800 (PST)), Keith Moore
• Re:, Jack De Winter
• Re:, Jack De Winter
  • Re:, Steve Hubert
  • Re:, Philip Hazel
    • Re:, Mark Crispin
      • Re:, Philip Hazel
      • Re:, Chris Newman
      • Re:, Randall Gellens
      • Re:, Kai Henningsen
      • Re:, Philip Hazel
      • Re:, Dave Crocker
      • Re:, Randall Gellens
      • Re:, Randall Gellens
• Welcome, Randall Gellens
  • [no subject], Steve Hubert
    • [no subject], Ned Freed
      • (response to message of Fri, 10 Jan 1997 00:09:59 -0800 (PST)), Mark Crispin

The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections to this Web page, please send them to phoffman@imc.org.