Re: Moving the TLS Process Forward

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Keith and all,

Keith Moore wrote:
> 
> Under current IESG balloting rules, a document absolutely cannot move
> forward over the objections of two IESG members.  So if two IESG
> members tell you that changes have to be made to a document, that's a
> very reliable indication that IESG won't let it move forward.
> 
> If the TLS WG chair requests a formal statement from IESG, I'm sure
> that IESG would comply with the request...but as IESG would have to
> draft a response, it probably wouldn't happen until after the next
> IESG meeting in late August.  I'd hate to see the TLS work delayed
> that long.
> 
> I don't think this group is at an impasse.  To me it looks to me like
> the two sides are approaching mutual understanding and perhaps even
> closure.

  IMHO it appears that there is some movment toward a solution, yes.
BUt yet a ways from closure.
> 
> Keith

Regards,
-- 
Jeffrey A. Williams
DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java Development Eng.
Information Eng. Group. IEG. INC. 
Phone :913-294-2375 (v-office)
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx