Hi Eric, Are you comfortable starting WGLC on the extensions update (and the ECC draft) yet? Best regards. Simon > -----Original Message----- > From: EKR [mailto:ekr@xxxxxxxx] > Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2004 8:54 AM > To: Simon Blake-Wilson > Cc: tls@xxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: FW: [TLS] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-tls-rfc3546bis-00.txt > > > "Simon Blake-Wilson" <sblakewilson@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > We just posted an internet-draft updating the extensions > RFC to deal > > with the issue of which documents can define new extensions - the > > current RFC allows only standards track RFCs while this > draft allows > > any RFC based on IETF consensus (which basically means IESG review). > > > > I've summarized the detailed list of changes below. > > > > Eric/Win ... How do you want to handle this? Given the > minor nature of > > the updates, can we proceed with working group last call on > this (and > > the ECC in TLS draft)? > Given the holidays, etc. let's see what people have to say > over the next few weeks. If there are no substantive comments > I'll initiate WGLC. > > -Ekr >
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls