[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[TLS] Time for ciphersuites with new hashes?

To: tls@xxxxxxxx
Subject: [TLS] Time for ciphersuites with new hashes?
From: Nelson B Bolyard <nelson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:44:14 -0800
Cc:
List-archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/tls>
List-help: <mailto:tls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.lists.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:tls@lists.ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: tls-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8a4) Gecko/20040927

In light of the news that SHA1 has been "broken"
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/02/sha1_broken.html
(collisions can be found with much less work than predicted),
is it time for us to be defining new ciphersuites that employ
SHA256, SHA384 and/or SHA512?

/Nelson

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [TLS] Time for ciphersuites with new hashes?
  - From: Peter Gutmann
- Re: [TLS] Time for ciphersuites with new hashes?
  - From: Jack Lloyd

Prev by Date: RE: FW: [TLS] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-tls-rfc3546bis-00.txt
Next by Date: Re: [TLS] Time for ciphersuites with new hashes?
Previous by thread: [TLS] new extension - domain hint
Next by thread: Re: [TLS] Time for ciphersuites with new hashes?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread