Re: [TLS] RFC 3456 - OCSP extension question

[David Hopwood <david.nospam.hopwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Joshua Ball wrote:
> In regards to the implementation of RFC 3546, in particular the OCSP extension.
> When the client does not wish to send any list of responders, what is the correct
> sequence to send

A zero-length vector.

> (as a zero length vector apparently has a special meaning).

If the client does not wish to send a list, then logically it *must* be the
case that "the responders are implicitly known to the server - e.g., by prior
arrangement." Otherwise how would the server know which responder to use?

-- 
David Hopwood <david.nospam.hopwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>



_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls