[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [TLS] TLS 1.1 and static DH

To: jnordqvist@xxxxxxxxxx, pasi.eronen@xxxxxxxxx, tls@xxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [TLS] TLS 1.1 and static DH
From: pgut001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Gutmann)
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 21:51:43 +1300
Cc:
In-reply-to: <000001c6f802$b6bc61e0$932a15ac@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/tls>
List-help: <mailto:tls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.lists.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:tls@lists.ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>

"Pasi Eronen" <pasi.eronen@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

>Of the open source libraries, at least GnuTLS, TLS Lite, and Cryptlib
>implement TLS 1.1. Opera web browser also has it, as does Certicom's SSL-C
>library. (I'm not sure if any of those implement the static DH suites,
>though.)

cryptlib definitely doesn't do static DH... in fact does anything?  Why would
anyone do it at all, for that matter?

Peter.

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [TLS] TLS 1.1 and static DH
  - From: Pasi.Eronen

References:
- RE: [TLS] TLS 1.1 and static DH
  - From: Pasi Eronen

Prev by Date: RE: [TLS] TLS 1.1 and static DH
Next by Date: RE: [TLS] TLS 1.1 and static DH
Previous by thread: RE: [TLS] TLS 1.1 and static DH
Next by thread: RE: [TLS] TLS 1.1 and static DH
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread