[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [TLS] RFC 3456 - OCSP extension question
Joshua Ball wrote:
> Hmmm... maybe I am misunderstanding the statement: "by prior
> arrangement"
The important phrase is "implicitly known". "By prior arrangement" is
an *example* of a way in which the responders could be implicitly known;
it's not normative.
--
David Hopwood <david.nospam.hopwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls