[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [TLS] TLS and SRP

To: Peter Sylvester <Peter.Sylvester@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [TLS] TLS and SRP
From: EKR <ekr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 07:17:48 -0800
Cc: tls@xxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <454F4F29.1030601@xxxxxxxxxx> (Peter Sylvester's message of "Mon, 06 Nov 2006 16:05:13 +0100")
List-archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/tls>
List-help: <mailto:tls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.lists.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:tls@lists.ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <454F4F29.1030601@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: EKR <ekr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) XEmacs/21.4.19 (berkeley-unix)

Peter Sylvester <Peter.Sylvester@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Hi,
>
> What is actual status of treating the SRP-TLS specification in this
> working group?
> As far as I remember, several implementers have requested that the
> text gets treated
> by the working group. I don't recall any reaction of the chairman.
>
> Thanks in advance for consideration.

The chairs have sent a number of commentsto the authors about the
architectural approach taken in the draft. As far as I know
they're still thinking about it.

-Ekr

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [TLS] TLS and SRP
  - From: Trevor Perrin

References:
- [TLS] TLS and SRP
  - From: Peter Sylvester

Prev by Date: [TLS] TLS and SRP
Next by Date: RE: [TLS] SPNEGO over TLS - proposed new work item
Previous by thread: [TLS] TLS and SRP
Next by thread: Re: [TLS] TLS and SRP
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread