Re: [TLS] ECDHE_PSK as WG item?

["Blumenthal, Uri" <uri@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Title: Re: [TLS] ECDHE_PSK as WG item?

I strongly believe that ECDHE-PSK is useful and should be done as a WG item. Technical comments will follow.

Tnx!
-- 
Regards,
Uri

On 1/7/08 2:25 AM, "Pasi.Eronen@xxxxxxxxx" <Pasi.Eronen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> <wg chair hat on>
>
> Mohammad Badra has requested that the TLS WG adopt
> draft-badra-ecdhe-tls-psk as a WG item. This draft was presented
> in Vancouver, but few comments have been received so far.
>
> Please use this thread to comment; not only the technical
> details, but whether you think this is useful; should it be
> done as WG item or individual document; and whether you're
> willing to work on this document.
>
> Best regards,
> Pasi
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls






_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls