I have read the draft-badra-tls-psk-new-mac-aes-gcm-02. I think that there is no significant issues that need consideration in this phase of the draft.
I just have a small comment concerning the 2nd table of section 3.2: the following could be added,
CipherSuite MAC PRF
TLS_DHE_PSK_WITH_NULL_SHA256 HMAC-SHA-256 P_SHA-256
TLS_DHE_PSK_WITH_NULL_SHA384 HMAC-SHA-384 P_SHA-384
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 5 May 2008 14:17:35 +0200 (CEST)
From: badra@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [TLS] ?draft-badra-tls-psk-new-mac-aes-gcm as WG item
(was: RE: Re:??TLS?document?status?update )
To: Pasi.Eronen@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: hassnaa.moustafa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ah@xxxxxxxxx, urien@xxxxxxx,
tls@xxxxxxxx
Message-ID: <50815.137.194.164.228.1209989855.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8
Dear Pasi,
>> Since the document is based and heavily borrows from
>> draft-ietf-tls-ecc-new-mac and draft-ietf-tls-rsa-aes-gcm, I would
>> like to request that the TLS WG adopts this document as a WG item.
>
> Comments from TLS WG members? (E.g., volunteers who promise to
> contribute text during the document's development)
>
> (To take this as a WG item, we actually need a *group* of people
> willing to work on this.)
I asked for volunteers to contribute text during the document
devecopement, and I received promises from:
Pascal Urien, urien@xxxxxxx
Alfred Hines, ah@xxxxxxxxx
Hassnaa Moustafa, hassnaa.moustafa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I hope other WG members are willing to work on that document.
Best regards,
Badra
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls