Archive of ietf-tls, by thread

• RE: Certificate attributes for sub-CA's?, (continued)
  • RE: Certificate attributes for sub-CA's?, Eberhard Rene G.
• New HTTP/TLS draft, EKR
• TLS-ECC draft, Tim Dierks
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: TLS-ECC draft, Jeff Williams
  • Re: TLS-ECC draft, Tom Weinstein
  • Re: TLS-ECC draft, Lewis McCarthy
• who, Olivier Paridaens
• DSS signature format, EKR
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: DSS signature format, Paul Hoffman / IMC
  • Re: DSS signature format, EKR
  • Re: DSS signature format, Jeff Nisewanger
  • Re: DSS signature format, Tim Dierks
  • Re: DSS signature format, EKR
  • Re: DSS signature format, David P. Kemp
  • Re: DSS signature format, Tom Weinstein
  • Re: DSS signature format, Jeff Nisewanger
  • Re: DSS signature format, David P. Kemp
  • Re: DSS signature format, David Brownell
  • Re: DSS signature format, Tim Dierks
  • Re: DSS signature format, Tom Weinstein
  • Re: DSS signature format, Tim Hudson
• new draft on attribute certificate based authorization, Stephen Farrell
• State of the specifications, Luc Perthuis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: State of the specifications, Win Treese
  • Re: State of the specifications, Chris Newman
• Algorithms and certificates, Luc Perthuis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Algorithms and certificates, David Brownell
• TLS/SSL related Internet-Drafts (Updated 2/18/98), Christopher Allen
• Hello Request Message, Baber Amin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Hello Request Message, EKR
  • Re: Hello Request Message, David Brownell
  • Re: Hello Request Message, EKR
  • Re: Hello Request Message, Tom Weinstein
  • Re: Hello Request Message, David Brownell
  • Re: Hello Request Message, EKR
  • Re: Hello Request Message, Tim Dierks
  • Re: Hello Request Message, David Brownell
  • Re: Hello Request Message, EKR
• I want TLS's source codes, Jen-Chi Liu
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: I want TLS's source codes, Patrick Eisenacher
• TLS WG meeting in Los Angeles, Win Treese
• REMINDER: ISOC 1998 Network and Distributed Security Symposium, David M. Balenson
• New Security Paradigm Workshop '98 Call For Papers, Mary Ellen Zurko
• EncryptedPreMasterSecret, Daniel Bleichenbacher
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-tls-https-00.txt, Internet-Drafts
• Minor error in spec, Will Price
• Definition of a strong cipher, Eberhard Rene G.
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Definition of a strong cipher, EKR
  • RE: Definition of a strong cipher, Eberhard Rene G.
  • Re: Definition of a strong cipher, EKR
  • RE: Definition of a strong cipher, Eberhard Rene G.
  • Re: Definition of a strong cipher, EKR
  • Re: Definition of a strong cipher, Tom Weinstein
  • RE: Definition of a strong cipher, Eberhard Rene G.
• TLS Extended Key Usage, Tim Dierks
• HTTP/TLS over a separate port draft, EKR
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: HTTP/TLS over a separate port draft, Keith Moore
  • Re: HTTP/TLS over a separate port draft, EKR
  • Re: HTTP/TLS over a separate port draft, David Brownell
  • Re: HTTP/TLS over a separate port draft, EKR
  • Re: HTTP/TLS over a separate port draft, David Brownell
  • Re: HTTP/TLS over a separate port draft, Keith Moore
  • Re: HTTP/TLS over a separate port draft, EKR
  • Re: HTTP/TLS over a separate port draft, EKR
  • Re: HTTP/TLS over a separate port draft, Keith Moore
  • Re: HTTP/TLS over a separate port draft, David Brownell
  • Re: HTTP/TLS over a separate port draft, Keith Moore
  • Re: HTTP/TLS over a separate port draft, David Brownell
  • Re: HTTP/TLS over a separate port draft, Keith Moore
  • Re: HTTP/TLS over a separate port draft, Paul Hoffman / IMC
  • Re: HTTP/TLS over a separate port draft, Tom Weinstein
  • Re: HTTP/TLS over a separate port draft, Keith Moore
  • Re: HTTP/TLS over a separate port draft, Jeff Williams
  • Re: HTTP/TLS over a separate port draft, Tom Weinstein
  • Re: HTTP/TLS over a separate port draft, David Brownell
  • Re: HTTP/TLS over a separate port draft, Keith Moore
• Re: Weak MAC on SSL V3 in export ciphers?, Tim Dierks
• TLS extension to support print-by-reference., Daniel Manchala
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: TLS extension to support print-by-reference., Tom Weinstein
  • Re: TLS extension to support print-by-reference., Ran Canetti
  • Re: TLS extension to support print-by-reference., Hapeman Dale
  • Re: TLS extension to support print-by-reference., Tom Weinstein
• SSLeay with TLS support, SSLeay TLS
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • SSLeay with TLS support, Holger Reif
• URI scheme and port numbers for TLS, Carl-Uno Manros
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: URI scheme and port numbers for TLS, EKR
  • Re: URI scheme and port numbers for TLS, Keith Moore
  • Re: URI scheme and port numbers for TLS, Jeff Williams
• length of premaster secret, Sana Mona
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: length of premaster secret, Eberhard Rene G.
• Closure Alerts and Session Resumption, EKR
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Closure Alerts and Session Resumption, David Brownell
  • Re: Closure Alerts and Session Resumption, David Wagner
  • Re: Closure Alerts and Session Resumption, David Brownell
  • Re: Closure Alerts and Session Resumption, EKR
  • Re: Closure Alerts and Session Resumption, Tim Dierks
  • Re: Closure Alerts and Session Resumption, David Brownell
• Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS [ crypto with a hole ], David Brownell
• Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, Will Price
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, EKR
  • Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, Will Price
  • Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, EKR
  • Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, Tom Weinstein
  • Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, Tom Weinstein
  • Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, Jeff Williams
  • Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, Tom Weinstein
  • Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, Ben Laurie
  • Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, Ned Freed
  • Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, Tom Weinstein
  • RE: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, Barb Fox
  • Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, Will Price
  • Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, Will Price
  • Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, Jeff Williams
  • Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, Jeff Williams
  • Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, EKR
  • Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, Will Price
  • Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, Jeff Williams
  • Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, EKR
  • Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, EKR
  • Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, EKR
  • Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, EKR
  • Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, William H. Geiger III
  • Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, Steve Schear
  • Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, Steve Schear
  • Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, William H. Geiger III
  • Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, Steve Schear
  • Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, William H. Geiger III
  • Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, Adam Back
  • Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, Steve Schear
  • Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, William H. Geiger III
  • Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP, Jeff Williams
• PRF usage, David Brownell
• Minutes for TLS WG meeting, 12/10/97, Win Treese
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Minutes for TLS WG meeting, 12/10/97, Tom Weinstein
  • Re: Minutes for TLS WG meeting, 12/10/97, Win Treese
  • Re: Minutes for TLS WG meeting, 12/10/97, Michael Boe
  • Re: Minutes for TLS WG meeting, 12/10/97, Win Treese
  • Re: Minutes for TLS WG meeting, 12/10/97, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
  • Re: Minutes for TLS WG meeting, 12/10/97, Christopher Allen
  • Re: Minutes for TLS WG meeting, 12/10/97, Jeff Williams
• An issue of licensing..., Steve Osman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: An issue of licensing..., Eric Murray
  • Re: An issue of licensing..., ajaber
• sha/md5 security negotiation, Randy Turner
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: sha/md5 security negotiation, Lewis McCarthy
  • Re: sha/md5 security negotiation, Tom Weinstein
  • Re: sha/md5 security negotiation, John Kennedy
  • Re: sha/md5 security negotiation, David P. Kemp
  • Re: sha/md5 security negotiation, David Brownell
  • Re: sha/md5 security negotiation, David Brownell
• even padding, Patrick Eisenacher
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: even padding, Tim Dierks
• Re: IPP and the security area (Re: Area Directors' comments on IPP), Paul Hoffman / IMC
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: IPP and the security area (Re: Area Directors' comments on IPP), Carl-Uno Manros
• Re: IPP and the security area (Re: Area Directors' comments on IPP), Carl-Uno Manros
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: IPP and the security area (Re: Area Directors' comments on IPP), Michael Boe
• TLS non-repudiation, mrozenbl
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: TLS non-repudiation, Ran Canetti
  • Re: TLS non-repudiation, Patrick Eisenacher
  • Re: TLS non-repudiation, David Brownell
  • Re: TLS non-repudiation, mrozenbl
• Re: IPP and the security area (Re: Area Directors' comments on IPP), Harald . T . Alvestrand
• TLS related Internet-Drafts reading list, Christopher Allen
• Protocol Action: The TLS Protocol Version 1.0 to Proposed Standard, The IESG
• Rationale for for SMTP/TLS, FTP/TLS, etc..., Will Price
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Rationale for for SMTP/TLS, FTP/TLS, etc..., David Brownell
  • Re: Rationale for for SMTP/TLS, FTP/TLS, etc..., David P. Kemp
  • Re: Rationale for for SMTP/TLS, FTP/TLS, etc..., Jeff Williams
  • Re: Rationale for for SMTP/TLS, FTP/TLS, etc..., Jeff Williams
  • Re: Rationale for for SMTP/TLS, FTP/TLS, etc..., Michael Boe
  • Re: Rationale for for SMTP/TLS, FTP/TLS, etc..., Chris Newman
  • Re: Rationale for for SMTP/TLS, FTP/TLS, etc..., Paul Hoffman / IMC
  • Re: Rationale for for SMTP/TLS, FTP/TLS, etc..., Ned Smith
  • Re: Rationale for for SMTP/TLS, FTP/TLS, etc..., Ned Freed
  • Re: Rationale for for SMTP/TLS, FTP/TLS, etc..., Ned Freed
• DH key exchange / client authentication, Patrick Eisenacher
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: DH key exchange / client authentication, David Brownell
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-tls-protocol-05.txt, Internet-Drafts
• more copy & paste errors in spec, Patrick Eisenacher
• old SSL description in TLS spec, Patrick Eisenacher
• export ciphers key lengths, Patrick Eisenacher
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: export ciphers key lengths, Tom Weinstein
  • Re: export ciphers key lengths, Mike Eisler
  • Re: export ciphers key lengths, Tom Weinstein
  • Re: export ciphers key lengths, Bob Monsour
  • Re: export ciphers key lengths, Shawn Abbott (Rainbow Technologies)
  • Re: export ciphers key lengths, Tom Weinstein
  • RE: export ciphers key lengths, Bell, Bob
  • Re: export ciphers key lengths, Mike Eisler
  • RE: export ciphers key lengths, Bell, Bob
• Re: please publish draft-ietf-tls-protocol-05.txt. as a Proposed Standard, ajaber
• please publish draft-ietf-tls-protocol-05.txt. as a Proposed Standard, Win Treese
• initial connection state, Patrick Eisenacher
• TLS_NULL_WITH_NULL_NULL, Philip Thambidurai
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: TLS_NULL_WITH_NULL_NULL, Eberhard, René
  • Re: TLS_NULL_WITH_NULL_NULL, Eric Murray
  • Re: TLS_NULL_WITH_NULL_NULL, Tom Weinstein
• WG Last Call: TLS draft to Proposed Standard, Win Treese
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: WG Last Call: TLS draft to Proposed Standard, Hugo Krawczyk
  • Re: WG Last Call: TLS draft to Proposed Standard, Ned Smith
  • Re: WG Last Call: TLS draft to Proposed Standard, Hugo Krawczyk
• TLS WG meeting at December IETF, Win Treese
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: TLS WG meeting at December IETF, Paul Hoffman / IMC
  • Re: TLS WG meeting at December IETF, Martin Carpenter
  • Re: TLS WG meeting at December IETF, Chris Newman
  • Re: TLS WG meeting at December IETF, Jim Whitehead
  • Re: TLS WG meeting at December IETF, Martin Carpenter
  • Re: TLS WG meeting at December IETF, Paul Hoffman / IMC
  • Re: TLS WG meeting at December IETF, Jim Whitehead
  • Re: TLS WG meeting at December IETF, Martin Carpenter
  • Re: TLS WG meeting at December IETF, Keith Moore
  • Re: TLS WG meeting at December IETF, Tom Weinstein
  • Re: TLS WG meeting at December IETF, Jeff Williams
  • Re: TLS WG meeting at December IETF, Keith Moore
  • Re: TLS WG meeting at December IETF, Tom Weinstein
  • Re: TLS WG meeting at December IETF, Keith Moore
  • Re: TLS WG meeting at December IETF, Hao Xu
  • Re: TLS WG meeting at December IETF, Jeff Williams
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-tls-protocol-04.txt, Internet-Drafts
• draft-ietf-tls-protocol-04.txt, Tim Dierks
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: draft-ietf-tls-protocol-04.txt, EKR
• Re: RSA-CipherSuite with DSA-cert, David Brownell
• US Patent 5657390, David Brownell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: US Patent 5657390, Tom Weinstein
  • Re: US Patent 5657390, Chris Newman
  • Re: US Patent 5657390, Tom Weinstein
  • Re: US Patent 5657390, Tim Hudson
  • Re: US Patent 5657390, Tom Weinstein
  • Re: US Patent 5657390, David Jablon
  • Re: US Patent 5657390, Dennis Glatting
  • Re: US Patent 5657390, Dennis Glatting
• SSL Patent, Jim Whitehead
• Draft status?, Jim Whitehead
• rump session in Munich?, Rodney Thayer
• Next Protocol, David P. Kemp
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Next Protocol, Ned Smith
  • Re: Next Protocol, Jeff Williams
  • Re: Next Protocol, Ned Smith
  • Re: Next Protocol, Jeff Williams
• put up or shut up (was Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal), Ned Smith
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: put up or shut up (was Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal), Keith Moore
• Obfuscation, John Kennedy
• CFP: SEC '98, plipp
• What are the Mandatory Ciphers Proposed?, ajaber
• Interoperability counter view, Pablo Calamera
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-tls-kerb-cipher-suites-01.txt, Internet-Drafts
• on mandatory ciphers, Win Treese
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: on mandatory ciphers, Ned Smith
  • Re: on mandatory ciphers, Paul Hoffman
  • Re: on mandatory ciphers, Tom Weinstein
  • Re: on mandatory ciphers, David Wagner
  • Re[2]: on mandatory ciphers, John H Wilson
  • Re: on mandatory ciphers, Tom Weinstein
  • Re: on mandatory ciphers, Pablo Calamera
  • Re: on mandatory ciphers, Ned Freed
  • Re: on mandatory ciphers, David P. Kemp
  • Re: on mandatory ciphers, David Brownell
  • Re: on mandatory ciphers, David P. Kemp
  • Re[2]: on mandatory ciphers, John H Wilson
  • Re: on mandatory ciphers, Ned Smith
  • Re: on mandatory ciphers, David Brownell
  • Re: on mandatory ciphers, Keith Moore
  • Re: on mandatory ciphers, Keith Moore
  • Re: on mandatory ciphers, Keith Moore
  • Re: Re[2]: on mandatory ciphers, Keith Moore
  • Re: on mandatory ciphers, Keith Moore
  • Re: on mandatory ciphers, Tom Weinstein
  • Re: on mandatory ciphers, Win Treese
• Basis for disagreement, Tim Dierks
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Basis for disagreement, Jeff Williams
  • Re: Basis for disagreement, Chris Newman
  • Re: Basis for disagreement, Yung-Kao Hsu
• tls, dan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: tls, Tim Dierks
  • Re: tls, Baber Amin
  • tls, Jean Park
  • Re: tls, ma
• TLS will not meet in Munich, Win Treese
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: TLS will not meet in Munich, Jeff Williams
  • Re: TLS will not meet in Munich, Ned Smith
  • Re: TLS will not meet in Munich, Christopher Allen
  • Re: TLS will not meet in Munich, Chris Newman
  • Re: TLS will not meet in Munich, Jeff Williams
  • RE: TLS will not meet in Munich, Barb Fox
  • RE: TLS will not meet in Munich, Rodney Thayer
  • Re: TLS will not meet in Munich, EKR
• Re: Moving forward (fwd), Chris Newman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Moving forward (fwd), Ned Smith
  • Re: Moving forward (fwd), Ned Smith
• Moving the TLS Process Forward, Christopher Allen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Moving the TLS Process Forward, Keith Moore
  • Re: Moving the TLS Process Forward, Jeff Williams
  • Re: Moving the TLS Process Forward, Jeff Williams
  • Re: Moving the TLS Process Forward, Tom Weinstein
• Attack against handshake protocol, Tammy Carter
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Attack against handshake protocol, Jeff Williams
  • Re: Attack against handshake protocol, EKR
  • Re: Attack against handshake protocol, David Wagner
• Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, Jeffrey I. Schiller
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, Tom Weinstein
  • Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, Chris Newman
  • Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, EKR
  • Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, Keith Moore
  • Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, Lewis McCarthy
  • Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, Ned Freed
  • Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, Tom Weinstein
  • Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, David P. Kemp
  • Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, Jeff Williams
  • Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, Luis Valente
  • Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, Keith Moore
  • Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, Jeff Williams
  • Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, Keith Moore
  • Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, Lewis McCarthy
  • Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, Jeff Williams
  • Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, Ned Freed
  • RE: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, Dennis Glatting
  • Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, Ned Freed
  • Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, Jeff Williams
  • Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, Keith Moore
  • Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, Ned Freed
  • Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, David P. Kemp
  • Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, Lewis McCarthy
  • Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, Jeff Williams
  • RE: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, Dan Simon
  • Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, Christopher Allen
  • Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, Christopher Allen
  • Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, Keith Moore
  • Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, Keith Moore
  • Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, Jeff Williams
  • Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, Jeff Williams
  • Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, Christopher Allen
  • Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, Keith Moore
  • Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, Keith Moore
  • Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, Keith Moore
  • Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, Ned Freed
  • Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, Ned Freed
  • Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, Tom Weinstein
  • Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, Keith Moore
  • Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, Lewis McCarthy
  • Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, Jeff Williams
  • Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, Jeff Williams
  • Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, Jeff Williams
  • Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, Ned Freed
  • Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, Christopher Allen
  • Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, Keith Moore
  • Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, Ned Smith
  • Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, Keith Moore
  • Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, Jeff Williams
  • Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, Tim Dierks
  • Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, Jeff Williams
  • Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, David P. Kemp
  • Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, Chris Newman
  • Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, Chris Newman
  • Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, David Brownell
  • Re: Comments on Mandatory Ciphers and a Proposal, David Brownell
• SASL will soon go to IETF Wide (4 week) Last Call, Jeffrey I. Schiller
• Question on TLS wire format, Baber Amin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Question on TLS wire format, Tim Dierks
• Two concrete proposals (was Re: My two cents ...), Chris Newman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Two concrete proposals (was Re: My two cents ...), Jeff Williams
• another mandatory cipher comment..., Rodney Thayer
• Re: My two cents on TLS mandatory ciphers, Pablo Calamera
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: My two cents on TLS mandatory ciphers, Jeff Williams
  • Re: My two cents on TLS mandatory ciphers, Pablo Calamera
  • Re: My two cents on TLS mandatory ciphers, John W. Noerenberg
  • Re: My two cents on TLS mandatory ciphers, Ned Smith
  • Re: My two cents on TLS mandatory ciphers, Ned Smith
  • Re: My two cents on TLS mandatory ciphers, Chris Newman
  • Re: My two cents on TLS mandatory ciphers, Jeff Williams
  • Re: My two cents on TLS mandatory ciphers, Jeff Williams
• My two cents on TLS mandatory ciphers [Long], Tim Dierks
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: My two cents on TLS mandatory ciphers [Long], John W. Noerenberg
  • Re: My two cents on TLS mandatory ciphers [Long], Eric Murray
  • Re: My two cents on TLS mandatory ciphers [Long], Tim Dierks
  • Re: My two cents on TLS mandatory ciphers [Long], Eric Murray
  • Re: My two cents on TLS mandatory ciphers [Long], David Wagner
  • Re: My two cents on TLS mandatory ciphers [Long], Jeff Williams
  • Re: My two cents on TLS mandatory ciphers [Long], David Wagner
  • Re: My two cents on TLS mandatory ciphers [Long], Jeff Williams
  • Re: My two cents on TLS mandatory ciphers [Long], Tom Weinstein
  • Re: My two cents on TLS mandatory ciphers [Long], Tom Weinstein
  • Re: My two cents on TLS mandatory ciphers [Long], David P. Kemp
  • Re: My two cents on TLS mandatory ciphers [Long], Chris Newman
  • Re: My two cents on TLS mandatory ciphers [Long], Chris Newman
  • Re: My two cents on TLS mandatory ciphers [Long], Eric Murray
  • Re: My two cents on TLS mandatory ciphers [Long], Moshe Rozenblit
  • Re: My two cents on TLS mandatory ciphers [Long], Chris Newman
  • Re: My two cents on TLS mandatory ciphers [Long], Tim Dierks
  • Re: My two cents on TLS mandatory ciphers [Long], Jeff Williams
  • Re: My two cents on TLS mandatory ciphers [Long], Jeff Williams
  • Re: My two cents on TLS mandatory ciphers [Long], Tom Weinstein
  • Re: My two cents on TLS mandatory ciphers [Long], Jeff Williams
  • Re: My two cents on TLS mandatory ciphers [Long], Tom Weinstein
  • Re: My two cents on TLS mandatory ciphers [Long], Dennis Glatting
  • Re: My two cents on TLS mandatory ciphers [Long], Lewis McCarthy
  • Re: My two cents on TLS mandatory ciphers [Long], Lewis McCarthy
  • Re: My two cents on TLS mandatory ciphers [Long], Weilan Wu
  • Re: My two cents on TLS mandatory ciphers [Long], David Wagner
  • Re: My two cents on TLS mandatory ciphers [Long], Tim Dierks
• MLPI (was Re: status of the draft), Chris Newman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: MLPI (was Re: status of the draft), Jeff Williams
• Re: efficiency of DHE_DSS vs. RSA_, David P. Kemp
• Re: Re: status of the draft (fwd), Chris Newman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: status of the draft (fwd), Tom Weinstein
• Re: efficiency of DHE_DSS vs. RSA_ [was Re: status of the draft], Lewis McCarthy
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: efficiency of DHE_DSS vs. RSA_ [was Re: status of the draft], Tom Weinstein
  • Re: efficiency of DHE_DSS vs. RSA_ [was Re: status of the draft], David Wagner
• Re: status of the TLS draft, Tim Dierks
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: status of the TLS draft, Chris Newman
• status of the draft, Win Treese
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: status of the draft, David P. Kemp
  • Re: status of the draft, Chris Newman
  • Re: status of the draft, Pablo Calamera
  • Re: status of the draft, Ben Laurie
  • Re: status of the draft, Chris Newman
  • Re: status of the draft, Tom Weinstein
  • Re: status of the draft, Rodney Thayer
  • Re: status of the draft, Pablo Calamera
  • Re: status of the draft, Lewis McCarthy
  • Re: status of the draft, Chris Newman
  • Re: status of the draft, Chris Newman
  • Re: status of the draft, Chris Newman
  • Re: status of the draft, Jeff Williams
  • Re: status of the draft, Moshe Rozenblit
  • Re: status of the draft, David P. Kemp
  • Re: status of the draft, Jeff Williams
  • Re: status of the draft, Ben Laurie
  • Re: status of the draft, Win Treese
  • Re: status of the draft, Pablo Calamera
  • Re: status of the draft, Chris Newman
  • RE: status of the draft, Dan Simon
  • Re: status of the draft, Pablo Calamera
  • Re: status of the draft, Chris Newman
  • RE: status of the draft, Chris Newman
  • Re: status of the draft, Jeff Williams
  • Re: status of the draft, Jeff Williams
  • Re: status of the draft, Jeff Williams
  • Re: Re: status of the draft, David Brownell
  • Re: status of the draft, Tom Weinstein
  • RE: status of the draft, Pablo Calamera
  • Re: status of the draft, Tom Weinstein
  • Re: status of the draft, Tom Weinstein
  • Re: status of the draft, Chris Newman
  • Re: status of the draft, Jeff Williams
  • Re: status of the draft, Jeff Williams
  • Re: status of the draft, Jeff Williams
  • Re: status of the draft, Jeff Williams
  • Re: status of the draft, Tom Weinstein
  • Re: status of the draft, Chris Newman
  • Re: status of the draft, David Brownell
  • Re: status of the draft, David Wagner
  • Re: status of the draft, Jeff Williams
  • Re: status of the draft, Jeff Williams
  • Re: status of the draft, Tom Weinstein
  • Re: status of the draft, Tom Weinstein
  • Re: status of the draft, Tom Weinstein
  • Re: status of the draft, David Jablon
  • Re: status of the draft, Tom Weinstein
  • Re: Re: status of the draft, Tim Dierks
  • Re: status of the draft, Jeff Williams
  • Re: status of the draft, Preda Mihailescu
  • Re: status of the draft, David Jablon
  • Re: status of the draft, Jeff Williams
  • Re: status of the draft, Chris Newman
  • Re: status of the draft, Jeff Williams
  • Re: status of the draft, John W. Noerenberg
  • Re: status of the draft, John W. Noerenberg
  • Re: status of the draft, David Brownell
  • Re: status of the draft, Christopher Allen
  • Re: status of the draft, Lewis McCarthy
  • Re: Re: status of the draft, Chris Newman
  • Re: status of the draft, Jeff Williams
  • Re: status of the draft, Jeff Williams
  • Re: status of the draft, Jeff Williams
  • Re: status of the draft, Tom Weinstein
  • Re: status of the draft, Tom Weinstein
  • Re: status of the draft, Chris Newman
  • Re: status of the draft, Chris Newman
  • Re: status of the draft, Chris Newman
  • Re: status of the draft, David Jablon
  • Re: status of the draft, John W. Noerenberg
  • Re: status of the draft, John W. Noerenberg
  • Re: status of the draft, John W. Noerenberg
  • Re: status of the draft, Jeff Williams
  • Re: status of the draft, David P. Kemp
  • Re: status of the draft, Jeff Williams
  • Re: status of the draft, Chris Newman
  • Re: status of the draft, Jeff Williams
  • Re: status of the draft, Chris Newman
  • Re: status of the draft, Jeff Williams
  • Re: status of the draft, Chris Newman
  • Re: status of the draft, Jeff Williams
• TLS WG meeting at Munich IETF, Win Treese
• [Fwd: Re: Core Attributes Discussion], Jeff Williams
• Re: Do we need IMAP/TLS or POP/TLS?, Jeff Williams
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Do we need IMAP/TLS or POP/TLS?, David P. Kemp
• Re: LDAPv3: Extension for Transport Layer Security, Jeff Williams
• explicit closure alert (close_notify) behavior?, Jeff Hodges
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: explicit closure alert (close_notify) behavior?, Tom Weinstein
  • Re: explicit closure alert (close_notify) behavior?, Jeff Williams

The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections to this Web page, please send them to phoffman@imc.org.