From: ? the Platypus {aka David Formosa} (n9505834@garbo.nepean.uws.edu.au)
Date: Tue Apr 21 1998 - 18:16:10 CDT
On Mon, 20 Apr 1998, Erland Sommarskog wrote:
[...]
> If this conventios is to be any useful, you will have to make it
> more general, for instanace saying that any occurrence of
> /\([^:]+:\s[^)]+\s*/ (to use a Perl reg-exp, see below) reflects a
> subject change.
>
> That is, any thing which starts off with left parenthesis followed
> by anything and then has ": " followed by more characters and a
> closing parenthesis.
Your regexp dosn't seem to require closing parenthesis. Is this what you
wished to say?
I'm a perl programer if you need perl programing hire me. Buy easter bilbies.
Please excuse my spelling as I suffer from agraphia see the url. Support NoCeM
http://www.cit.nepean.uws.edu.au/~dformosa/Spelling.html http://www.cm.org/
I'm sorry but I just don't consider 'because its yucky' a convincing argument