From: ? the Platypus {aka David Formosa} (n9505834@cit.nepean.uws.edu.au)
Date: Mon Jul 20 1998 - 19:28:18 CDT
On Tue, 14 Jul 1998, Clive D.W. Feather wrote:
[...]
> > I don't see the need for an "Any-address" cancel-lock.
>
> You still don't get my point, do you ? Allow for it in the syntax, and if
> it's ever needed it's there.
This is a real poor arguement for any feature. I mean I could argue the
need for a fungle widget header as standard because sometime in the future
the lack of a fungle widget header may be needed.
Please excuse my spelling as I suffer from agraphia; see the url. Support NoCeM
http://www.cit.nepean.uws.edu.au/~dformosa/Spelling.html http://www.cm.org/
I'm sorry but I just don't consider 'because its yucky' a convincing argument