From: Ralph Babel (rbabel-rfc1036@babylon.Hennig.DE)
Date: Tue Jul 28 1998 - 11:23:57 CDT
Brad Templeton wrote:
> if one of your users proudly refuses to cancel you might
> have the right to say, "Post that without our name on it
> then, if it has our name on it, we have the right to veto
> it."
Considering that all of this is pure politics, there's no
right or wrong. Here's my point of view, though: If the user
violates the acceptable-use conditions you set, then feel
free to terminate his account. This doesn't give you the
right to cancel _earlier_ messages of his, though. Again,
this is politics, so you may well include a section in the
contract that states otherwise. All of this indicates that
our draft should remain silent on the issue who may and who
may not issue cancels.