Followup-To:

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Erland Sommarskog (sommar@algonet.se)
Date: Mon Aug 23 1999 - 07:55:55 CDT


Charles Lindsey <chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk> writes:
> The syntax is the same as that of the Newsgroups-content, with the
> exception that the magic word "poster" means that followups should
> be mailed to the article's reply address rather than posted. In
> the absence of a Followup-To header, the default newsgroup(s) for a
> followup are those in the Newsgroups header, and for this reason
> the Followup-To header should not be included if it just duplicates
> the Newsgroups header.

"should not"? Should that not be "SHOULD NOT"?

--
Erland Sommarskog, Stockholm, sommar@algonet.se


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view


This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29.