From: Charles Lindsey (chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk)
Date: Thu May 06 1999 - 04:34:25 CDT
In <Rrn18IA5PAM3QA9M@turnpike.com> Paul Overell <paulo@turnpike.com> writes:
>[MESSFOR] uses the word "sender" 6 times referring to the agent and a
>futher 8 times referring to the field (I counted!), and this ignores the
>use of the word in the formal syntax. It uses the word "transmitter"
>just once in its explanation of the sender. It is not defining the word
>transmitter as a technical term. The technical term is "sender", an
>eminently sensible term for use with the Sender: field.
Thaks. I did not have a grepable version of MESSFOR, so I was scanning
optically. Now fixed.
-- Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------ Email: chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl Voice/Fax: +44 161 437 4506 Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K. PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5