Re: Section_7.02.02

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Charles Lindsey (chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk)
Date: Fri Nov 05 1999 - 06:15:10 CST


In <yliu3h1vcd.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu> writes:

>INN is very, very picky about duplicated headers. It will reject any
>article that has a duplicated Control header, both local posting and
>transit (as well as a duplicated just-about-anything-else-it-knows-about).
>I intend to fix this, but it requires redoing the header parsing code and
>I haven't had a chance yet.

But hold on a minute. Our draft currently forbids duplicated headers,
except where explicitly allowed. So what INN is doing is currently
absolutely correct. So I think you should leave it alone unless we
deliberately decide to allow them.

Does anybody think that we should?

-- 
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Email:     chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk  Web:   http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Voice/Fax: +44 161 437 4506      Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9     Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7  65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view


This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29.