From: Charles Lindsey (chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk)
Date: Thu Nov 11 1999 - 04:54:39 CST
In <v04220800b44f5aca2272@[216.229.13.10]> "G. James Berigan" <usefor@war-of-the-worlds.org> writes:
>BTW, shouldn't new.group be followed by optional moderation status? That
>would also allow:
> mvgroup old.group old.group moderated
But that effect is currently achieved by reissuing the newgroup message.
We already agreed not to use mvgroup to do what newgroup already did (e.g.
boosters) when we removed the optionality of the 2nd parameter to mvgroup.
-- Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------ Email: chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl Voice/Fax: +44 161 437 4506 Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K. PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5