Re: Section_7.02.02

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Clive D.W. Feather (clive@demon.net)
Date: Thu Nov 11 1999 - 11:14:04 CST


Charles Lindsey said:
> Yes, but formalizing nocem would be a major addition to our draft and
> hence forbidden at the moment by our Chariman's edict. And we cannot just
> go and do it without consultation with Cancelmoose, or whoever is
> currently responsible. And even then it should probably be in a separate
> RFC. Does anyone else want to go down this route?

Um, I overlooked this when writing the message I just sent about bulk
cancels. I'm quite happy for it to be done as a separate stage rather than
right now.

-- 
Clive D.W. Feather  | Work:  <clive@demon.net>   | Tel: +44 20 8371 1138
Internet Expert     | Home:  <clive@davros.org>  | Fax: +44 20 8371 1037
Demon Internet      | WWW: http://www.davros.org | Mobile: +44 7973 377646


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view


This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29.