Re: Section_5.02.02

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)
Date: Sat Oct 02 1999 - 22:50:14 CDT


Ralph Babel <rbabel@babylon.pfm-mainz.de> writes:
> Charles Lindsey wrote:

>> if "FOO", "Foo" and "foo" are actually different UUCP names in the
>> world maps, and the sites in question choose to use them in Path
>> headers, then propagation may suffer.

> => clearly a "SHOULD NOT" according to RFC 2119.

I wouldn't object to changing that to a SHOULD NOT for UUCP names and a
MUST NOT for everything else.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)         <URL:http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view


This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29.