From: Claus Färber (list-ietf-wg-apps-usefor@faerber.muc.de)
Date: Sat Oct 02 1999 - 19:00:00 CDT
Charles Lindsey <chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk> schrieb/wrote:
> In <7Pk028QocDB@faerber.muc.de> list-ietf-wg-apps-usefor@faerber.muc.de (Claus Färber) writes:
>> We can't make normative reference to RFC 2119 and then redefine it,
>> especially not in a NOTE. ...
>
> Well it could easily be upgraded from NOTE to full status.
This would leave us with:
< We can't make normative reference to RFC 2119 and then redefine it.
I.e. we would have two conflicting definitions for the capitalised
imperatives, one of which is a BCP and the other one home-grown.
-- Claus Andre Faerber <http://www.faerber.muc.de> PGP: ID=1024/527CADCD FP=12 20 49 F3 E1 04 9E 9E 25 56 69 A5 C6 A0 C9 DC