Re: Signatures (was: Issues remaining in Section 6)

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Terje Bless (link@tss.no)
Date: Sat Oct 30 1999 - 17:08:26 CDT


On 27.10.99 at 21:04, Jonathan Grobe <grobe@worf.netins.net> wrote:

>On Wed, 27 Oct 1999, Charles Lindsey wrote:
>
>>Posting agents SHOULD discourage (at least with a warning) signatures of
>>excessive length (4 lines is a commonly accepted limit).
>>
>I don't think this should be in the draft. This is a netiquette issue.

Well, if it's left in it should be expressed as a technical-ish limit along
the lines of the 998 octet limit or the 21 Message-ID limit. Since I'm of
the opinion that both those limits are artificial and counter-productive,
I'd suggest leaving out any mention of a limit for signatures. While you
could make the same kinds of arguments for that limit as the other two, I
feel the intent would be much better served by requiring the use of the
signature separator and enforcing stripping of signatures in replies.


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view


This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29.