Re: Draft section_5.02.03

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)
Date: Mon Sep 20 1999 - 10:36:31 CDT


Answering old mail.

Adam Bailey <adamb@lull.org> writes:

> -snip-
> 5.3. Message-ID
> -snip-
> [...]a message identifier MUST NOT be altered in any way
> during transport[...]

> How does this jive with moderation techniques that modify the
> Message-ID? news.newusers.questions' prepending of "nnq." to the
> original Message-ID would be an example of this.

That practice should be deprecated. Moderators shouldn't be modifying
message IDs; it can lead to loops and other unpleasantness. Currently
they have to do so to some degree because messages come through mail and
mail message IDs aren't necessarily valid for news; with this standard,
we'll standardize an encapsulation protocol for sending messages via
e-mail and the encapsulated article must have a valid message ID already.

Anyway, moderators aren't part of transport, so this section doesn't
really apply to them.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)         <URL:http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view


This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29.