From: Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)
Date: Mon Sep 20 1999 - 11:18:47 CDT
Charles Lindsey <chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk> writes:
> 6.4. Reply-To
[...]
> "Reply-To: <>" MAY be used to indicate that the poster does not
> wish to recieve email replies.
> 6.4.1. Examples
> Reply-To: John Smith <jsmith@site.example>
> Reply-To: John Smith <jsmith@site.example>, dave@isp.example
> Reply-To: John Smith <jsmith@site.example>, andrew@isp.example,
> fred@site2.example
> Reply-To: Please do not reply <>
Given your example, I believe that should be "An address of "<>" in the
Reply-To header MAY be used to indicate..." as the example doesn't use the
literal string the text refers to.
-- Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu) <URL:http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>