From: John Moreno (phenix@interpath.com)
Date: Mon Sep 20 1999 - 15:40:43 CDT
Charles Lindsey <chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk> wrote:
-snip-
> >References. There was a little discussion, and I think we should now
> >reduce the number kept to first plus last 20, and to remove the
> >suggestion that implementations need to look at the body. There remains
> >the question of whether trimming the Referemces (when you do a followup)
> >should be a SHOULD or a MAY. Currently it says SHOULD, but I would be
> >happier with MAY.
I believe SHOULD is the right thing to do. An ever growing header that
goes into the overview?
> >Approved. There is mention of strengthening this. Should this wait until
> >we have dealt with authentication matters?
Wait.
-- John Moreno