Re: Draft section_5.02.03

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Claus Färber (list-ietf-wg-apps-usefor@faerber.muc.de)
Date: Sun Sep 26 1999 - 12:12:00 CDT


Ralph Babel <rbabel@babylon.pfm-mainz.de> schrieb/wrote:
> Yes, according to RFC 2119. Unfortunately, that's not
> "our" definition of "SHOULD NOT" and "MUST NOT".

The current text (draft...02, and the current update available from the
website) just references 2119, which is the right thing to do. When has
"our" definition changed (again)?

-- 
Claus Andre Faerber <http://www.faerber.muc.de>
PGP: ID=1024/527CADCD FP=12 20 49 F3 E1 04 9E 9E  25 56 69 A5 C6 A0 C9 DC


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view


This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29.