From: Charles Lindsey (chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk)
Date: Mon Sep 27 1999 - 06:43:29 CDT
In <7PbryXM3cDB@faerber.muc.de> list-ietf-wg-apps-usefor@faerber.muc.de (Claus Färber) writes:
>Ralph Babel <rbabel@babylon.pfm-mainz.de> schrieb/wrote:
>> Yes, according to RFC 2119. Unfortunately, that's not
>> "our" definition of "SHOULD NOT" and "MUST NOT".
>The current text (draft...02, and the current update available from the
>website) just references 2119, which is the right thing to do. When has
>"our" definition changed (again)?
You will find the text covering this issue on the website in
section_2.02.02, which has been there since June 1st.
-- Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------ Email: chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl Voice/Fax: +44 161 437 4506 Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K. PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5