From: Claus Färber (list-ietf-wg-apps-usefor@faerber.muc.de)
Date: Mon Sep 27 1999 - 19:00:00 CDT
Charles Lindsey <chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk> schrieb/wrote:
> In <7PbryXM3cDB@faerber.muc.de> list-ietf-wg-apps-usefor@faerber.muc.de (Claus Färber) writes:
>> The current text (draft...02, and the current update available from the
>> website) just references 2119, which is the right thing to do. When has
>> "our" definition changed (again)?
>
> You will find the text covering this issue on the website in
> section_2.02.02, which has been there since June 1st.
We can't make normative reference to RFC 2119 and then redefine it,
especially not in a NOTE. So it's only a wrong explanation, not a
differing definition.
-- Claus Andre Faerber <http://www.faerber.muc.de> PGP: ID=1024/527CADCD FP=12 20 49 F3 E1 04 9E 9E 25 56 69 A5 C6 A0 C9 DC