From: Charles Lindsey (chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk)
Date: Mon Aug 07 2000 - 07:49:36 CDT
In <ylk8dxsh9u.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu> writes:
>Charles Lindsey <chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk> writes:
>> But to return to Russ' Approved-For, how does the following grab you?
>> Moderated-By: Joe Moderator <approvals@joe.com>
>> newsgroups="comp.lang.foo.moderated,comp.sys.bar"
>> Moderated-By-1: <foo@announce.org> newsgroups=comp.lang.foo.announce
>The -1 shouldn't be necessary. Apart from that, I like it.
The -1 is there so that moderators who wish to include digital signatures
covering their own bits can identify the bit they have signed. It is in
line the with Signed:, Signed-1:, Signed-2 etc (with matchinv Verified-n:)
of my main signature proposal.
Anyway, that is now two people who have said they like it. Do we want to
include it as a new header in our Draft? If so, then I would suggest the
next move would be to float the idea on the moderators mailing list, and
see what reactions we get.
-- Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------ Email: chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl Voice/Fax: +44 161 437 4506 Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K. PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5