two RFCs (was: Time to Finish up and Close List?)

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Maurizio Codogno (mau@beatles.cselt.it)
Date: Wed Aug 30 2000 - 02:41:28 CDT


Russ:

> > Specifically Charles I think we should start with poll about our future
> > directions. I like Erland's of a two part process: getting what we have
> > now out the door and then a second RFC about header signing,
> > cancel-locks...
>
> At this stage, I'd tend strongly that direction myself, although it would
> be difficult to word the draft in such a way as to make it clear that
> authentication is vital but will be added later. :/

Especially when we have to fill in the Security Considerations :-|

ciao ,.mau.


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view


This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29.