Re: Posting Guidelines for comp.lang.perl.misc ($Revision: 0.1 $)

From: Henry Spencer (henry@spsystems.net)
Date: Tue Dec 26 2000 - 11:39:08 CST

• Next message: Erland Sommarskog: "Re: "Ought""
• Previous message: Russ Allbery: "Re: Posting Guidelines for comp.lang.perl.misc ($Revision: 0.1 $)"
• In reply to: Russ Allbery: "Re: Posting Guidelines for comp.lang.perl.misc ($Revision: 0.1 $)"

On 25 Dec 2000, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Shouldn't that be:
> "done by an underscore, a backspace, and a character, repeated for
> each character that should be underlined."

Yes, it should. My fault; I believe the current wording comes from
son-of-1036. Don't know what I was thinking of...

> Cc'd to usefor.

Sent only to the list, but feel free to pass it on.

                                                          Henry Spencer
                                                       henry@spsystems.net

• Next message: Erland Sommarskog: "Re: "Ought""
• Previous message: Russ Allbery: "Re: Posting Guidelines for comp.lang.perl.misc ($Revision: 0.1 $)"
• In reply to: Russ Allbery: "Re: Posting Guidelines for comp.lang.perl.misc ($Revision: 0.1 $)"