Re: Backspace? (was: "Ought")

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)
Date: Thu Dec 28 2000 - 05:00:37 CST


Charles Lindsey <chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk> writes:

> The 'bar' is actually _^Hb_^Ha_^Hr and the 'baz' is ___^H^H^Hbaz.

Gnus understands the former; the latter resulted in three underscores, a
bold backspace character, and "baz" (which makes logical sense).

> 'more' (also 'page') shows bar underlined, but not baz. 'lp' prints them
> both underlined (using 'postprint' and a postscript printer).

> Our present text suggests that both should work. Should I change it so
> as to encourage the first form?

I think the present text should be changed to only document the first
form, as I don't think any terminal emulator or major news reader ever
understood the second. It's unfortunate that the method that works is
less readable in a newsreader without support for it.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view


This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29.