Re: Backspace? (was: "Ought")

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Charles Lindsey (chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk)
Date: Fri Dec 29 2000 - 11:57:01 CST


In <ylpuicn73e.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu> writes:

>Charles Lindsey <chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk> writes:

>> The 'bar' is actually _^Hb_^Ha_^Hr and the 'baz' is ___^H^H^Hbaz.

>Gnus understands the former; the latter resulted in three underscores, a
>bold backspace character, and "baz" (which makes logical sense).

>I think the present text should be changed to only document the first
>form, as I don't think any terminal emulator or major news reader ever
>understood the second. It's unfortunate that the method that works is
>less readable in a newsreader without support for it.

OK, it now says:

Backspace SHOULD be used only for underlining, done by preceding each
character to be underlined by an underscore (ASCII 95) followed by a
backspace.

-- 
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Email:     chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk  Web:   http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Voice/Fax: +44 161 436 6131      Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9     Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view


This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29.