Re: section_5.02.04 From

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (Shmuel@acm.org)
Date: Mon Feb 07 2000 - 06:23:30 CST


In <20000206172012.B6102@demon.net>, on 02/06/2000
   at 05:20 PM, "Clive D.W. Feather" <clive@demon.net> said:

>Any mailbox in the From-content field SHOULD belong to one of the
>poster(s) of the article, be one which he is authorized to use, or be
>an address which ends in the top level domain of ".invalid" [RFC
>2606].

I'd suggest two small changes:

 Any mailbox in the From-content field SHOULD belong to one of the
 poster(s) of the article, be one that he is authorized by the owner
to use,
 or be an address which ends in the top level domain of ".invalid"
[RFC
 2606].

That makes clearer the consensus intent to not allow such addresses as
joe@job.example.com, even though they are "authorized". Note: I
personally consider using any reserved domain to be equivalent to the
specific form given here, but since there was a consensus the wording
should reflect it unambiguously, and without the term "owner" there
might be a question of what "authorized" means.

--
-----------------------------------------------------------
     Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
     Atid/2
     Team OS/2
     Team PL/I
-----------------------------------------------------------


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view


This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29.