Re: Differences from MESSFOR

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)
Date: Fri Jan 28 2000 - 06:34:45 CST


Charles Lindsey <chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk> writes:

> 2. In the References header in MESSFOR (and even in RFC 822) the
> whitespace between references is optional. In RFC 1036 and in our draft
> it is obligatory (and software is known to barf if it is omitted).

In the process of writing my message to the DRUMS people about this, I
noticed that I don't think our specification requires whitespace either.
Notice:

References-content = msg-id *( CFWS msg-id )

and from MESSFOR:

CFWS = *([FWS] comment) [FWS]

So CFWS can reduce to the empty string. I believe that in order to
actually require at least one whitespace character, our specification
would need to be written as:

References-content = msg-id *( FWS [CFWS] msg-id )

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)         <URL:http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view


This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29.