From: Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)
Date: Fri Jan 28 2000 - 11:22:23 CST
G James Berigan <usefor@war-of-the-worlds.org> writes:
> But looking at the production we have in section 2.4 of USEFOR:
> CFWS = *([FWS] comment) (([FWS] comment) / FWS )
DRUMS is supposed to have (and will actually have):
CFWS = *([FWS] comment) FWS
This would appear to me to be entirely equivalent to what we currently
have, but simpler. I think it would be good to just adopt the exact
MESSFOR ABNF.
> Incidentally, what about the " " convention for noting the position of
> trimmed IDs? I see USEFOR and MESSFOR both don't allow for CFWS to have
> consecutive whitespace. Should FWS be 1*FWS?
FWS allows any number of consecutive whitespace characters.
-- Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu) <URL:http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>